Disadvantage:
[...]
* Traffic for passive users
Also for the active users -- it'll mean poi developers will have to
sift through user questions. Perhaps not a big deal, just something
to consider.
FWIW, I'm a very passive user and I don't mind whichever way you
decide. I would find the
Cool, as far as automated messages...
AFAIK we only have
1. Gump reports
2. Commit messages
3. Bug reports
I read all three of those when they appear on the list...
-Andy
Danny Mui wrote:
I agree with Andy's (which one? you decide!) sentiment here. We have
a few automated messages in the
Sometimes the bugzilla reports have 5+ entries that can bury messages on
the list. It may introduce excess noise to users but I see your
point. POI users are diferent, they're developers. They should read
that stuff in the event they have insight on issues/bugs and pitch in.
Ok sold,
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate list for the default
bugzilla and cvs
Hey avik, can you post again? ;-)
Avik Sengupta wrote:
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
yes
I however think that there
Avik Sengupta wrote, On 25/03/2003 2.53:
I do agree that poi users are usually developers, so a separate user and dev
lists for discussion does not make sense, so closing poi-user and moving all
discussion to poi-dev would be a good idea.
I however think that there probably should be a separate
I wouldn't mind bugzilla so much if it just had a reasonable subject
line. The do not reply with a bug number really don't give you a lot
to go on. Any way we can swap to Jira?
A. Is it opensource
B. Worth the effort? (cost/benefit)
C. Are you volunteering to:
1 install it
2
-
From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:46 PM
To: POI Developers List; POI Users List
Subject: [PROPOSAL] close poi-users
Hi all,
We have a users list primarily because everyone else has one.
Secondly I though that the traffic would be unbearable
12 matches
Mail list logo
