IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-22 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
I have created a branch called REL_1_5_BRANCH in CVS. All bug fixes not specific to the 2.0 work should go into this branch. These will be merged back into the main trunk by me. Merge points will be tagged like this: REL_1_5_BRANCH_MERGE1 REL_1_5_BRANCH_MERGE2 etc... Releases will

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-22 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
> Don't forget which branch you are currently on. This is critically > important. Committing stuff to the wrong branch causes all sorts of > headaches and I will come over to your country and kill you so you don't :-o > want that. Having said that I'll probably stuff-up and commit to the wro

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-22 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
> > > Don't forget which branch you are currently on. This is critically > > important. Committing stuff to the wrong branch causes all sorts of > > headaches and I will come over to your country and kill you so you don't > > :-o > > > want that. Having said that I'll probably stuff-up and co

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-22 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Glen Stampoultzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Don't forget which branch you are currently on. This is critically > > > important. Committing stuff to the wrong branch causes all sorts of > > > headaches and I will come over to your country and kill you so you don't > > > > :-o > > >

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
> > In this country we regard such acts as terrorism.. Joining the Axis of > > Evil are we? > > You just wait until I start using stong encription. Then I'll be a real > terrorist. > > -- Glen > > :-o And me along with you! Good thing I can't be held indefinitely while my immigration stat

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 02:14, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > From: "Glen Stampoultzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > Don't forget which branch you are currently on. This is critically > > > > important. Committing stuff to the wrong branch causes all sorts of > > > > headaches and I will c

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
> JIC thats a point -- we'd need lots of smart legal minds to tell us what > we can and can't do before we handle *protected* worksheets. (and that > would have to be someone else's initiativeit bores me) > Didn't you know?... information wants to be free...

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Glen Stampoultzis
> > :-o And me along with you! Good thing I can't be held indefinitely > while my immigration status is determined.:-o or can I?? > You mean in our luxury desert resorts? Sure, I know I guy who'll send you over first class in one of his fine boats for a measly $20,000...

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 08:16, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > > JIC thats a point -- we'd need lots of smart legal minds to tell us what > > we can and can't do before we handle *protected* worksheets. (and that > > would have to be someone else's initiativeit bores me) > > > > Didn't you know?...

Re: IMPORTANT: New branch

2002-04-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Glen Stampoultzis wrote: >>:-o And me along with you! Good thing I can't be held indefinitely >>while my immigration status is determined.:-o or can I?? >> > >You mean in our luxury desert resorts? Sure, I know I guy who'll send you >over first class in one of his fine boats for a measly $2