Tetsuya,
I've read the new title in the Poi home page and I'm struggling to
understand what it means. Can we reword this?
Regards,
Glen Stampoultzis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/
-
To unsubscribe,
Actually that change (where we simply renamed POI->Poi) was vetoed by Mr.
Klute and should be reverted by Mr. Kitahata.
If Mr. Kitahata creates a new page with Poi, it would be disrespectful for
Mr. Klute to veto it and he'd have no cause.
The motion to effect a lock and barrel change in this pol
Yes, please. CVS commit, please.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:20:30 +1000
(Subject: POI Title (Attn: Tetsuya))
Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tetsuya,
>
> I've read the new title in the Poi home page and I'm struggl
Okay, I renamed (Poi->POI) and CVS committed.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 23:32:21 -0400
(Subject: Re: POI Title (Attn: Tetsuya))
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually that change (where we simply renamed POI->Poi) was vetoed
ieve me.
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
P.S. I thought Glen wanted to fix my misspellings or something.
Very sorry. > Glen
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 12:49:01 +0900
(Subject: Re: POI Title (Attn: Tetsuya))
Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, I renamed (Poi->P
At 02:58 PM 4/08/2003, you wrote:
Also, update on daedalus has done.
Please cross check.
"Jakarta Poi" at left-side navi and title had been appended by me
around two weeks ago or thereabouts (please check "^cvs commit:\s.+"
subject mails). I built from the CVS HEAD and put to daedalus a
little wh
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:36:57 +1000
(Subject: Re: POI Title (Attn: Tetsuya))
Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually it wasn't about POI or Poi or PoI. I just don't understand the
> sentence:
>
> Jakarta POI - Java APIs with XML manipulate
On 8/4/03 1:47 AM, "Tetsuya Kitahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 15:36:57 +1000
> (Subject: Re: POI Title (Attn: Tetsuya))
> Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Actually it wasn't about POI or Poi
