cel as a double and we're just using
> > >standard Java routines to convert to a double from bytes. The error is
> > >reasonably large too.
> > >
> > >-- Glen
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -
> > >From: "Andrew
gt; >>
> >>Teutscher, Uwe wrote:
> >>
> >>>But with poi version 1.0.1 I get the correct result.
> >>>I think this is a step back.
> >>>
> >>>Uwe
> >>>
> >>>-Original Message-
> >>>Fr
t;
>Night.
>
>-- Glen
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:14 AM
>Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with v1.5.0-dev-20020416
>
>
t;
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:30 PM
> >Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with
v1.5.0-dev-20020416
> &
his is a step back.
>>>
>>>Uwe
>>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:05 PM
>>>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>>Subject: Re: Wrong resu
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with v1.5.0-dev-20020416
> Anyone have any thoughts on this one?
>
> Teutscher, Uwe wrote:
>
> >But with poi version 1.0.1 I get the correct result.
> >I think this
M
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: Re: Wrong result from numberic cell value with
>v1.5.0-dev-20020416
>
>
>Yes this is a documentation bug. We're using double. double rounding
>is not 100% accurate. Future versions may support BigDecimal as well,
>but not
