Glen, Rainer,
To tell the truth, I also agree with this point.
Especially, this line:
> Vetoing the making of this decision was not cool
--
My preference (opinion) is "Poi" rather than "POI".
Because
1. This project used this "POI" as acronym and the market knows
the *fact*.
2. Making all
Rainer, I agree.
Although I preferred Poi I feel it's much more important to be
consistent. A simple vote would have cleared this whole point up and we
would no longer be having this conversation. Vetoing the making of this
decision was not cool and reflects an unwillingness on Andy's part to
>It is not appropriate to go through the docs and change one to another,
>however we have not indeed voted to change from the convention that both are
>acceptable. Spelling it Poi on new Doc's that are created is ATM
>acceptable.
This is a typical purely technical attitude. What do you think why
> tetsuya 2003/07/29 03:40:19
>
> Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs casestudies.xml
>src/documentation/content/xdocs/getinvolved book.xml
>src/documentation/content/xdocs/trans book.xml
> guidelines.xml index.xml
> Log:
>
tetsuya 2003/07/29 03:40:19
Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs casestudies.xml
src/documentation/content/xdocs/getinvolved book.xml
src/documentation/content/xdocs/trans book.xml
guidelines.xml index.xml
Log:
FIXED miscs (ma
