Re: Patch: Dictionary should be read in the codepage of the section it's in.

Rainer Klute wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2005, 10:37 +1000 schrieb Daniel Noll: Danny Mui wrote: Can you attach it to a bug with a prefix of [PATCH]? Easier to track down changes down the road. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=POI Done: http://issues.apa

Re: Patch: Dictionary should be read in the codepage of the section it's in.

Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2005, 10:37 +1000 schrieb Daniel Noll: > Danny Mui wrote: > > > Can you attach it to a bug with a prefix of [PATCH]? Easier to track > > down changes down the road. > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=POI > > Done: http://issues.apache.org/bu

Re: another problem

Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2005, 12:44 + schrieb Roel Bylemans: > with the jar I created, I can write properties to documents. The problem now > is > that I can't read the properties anymore. I think it has something to do that > some methods are changed. When I use the poi-2.5.1-final-20040804.

another problem

hello, with the jar I created, I can write properties to documents. The problem now is that I can't read the properties anymore. I think it has something to do that some methods are changed. When I use the poi-2.5.1-final-20040804.jar I can read the properties, but I can't write because it isn't

Re: write properties

thanks for the help, i solved the problem myself. I did something wrong with compiling a file. Now it's working properly - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi