Hi!
I have a question about throttle - SENDERTHROTTLE -(one more, sorry). In
the readme it states that `pass` meains a failure.
I`m having thousand messages from pass like this:
Aug 24 03:27:32 srv-06-lb postfix-policyd-sf: rcpt=3132219, throttle=pass
And also `bypass`
Aug 24 03:24:39 srv-03-lb
On Fri, August 24, 2007 16:55, Stuart Auchterlonie wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> PS: rememember SPF in bind as rr record !
> That should be TXT record.
bind 9.4.x have natively spf as rfc now
Mail::SPF test for SPF and TXT spf records
Mail::SPF::Query just test for TXT records
google more g
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> PS: rememember SPF in bind as rr record !
>
That should be TXT record.
Stuart
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Sea
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:09:10AM -0500, Jim Wright wrote:
> But since SPF is a bad standard and easy to get around by spammers,
> what's the point? Spammers were some of the early adopters of SPF to
> legitimize their mail...
SPF is not intended to prevent spam, only to prevent forgery (though
On Fri, August 24, 2007 16:09, Jim Wright wrote:
> But since SPF is a bad standard and easy to get around by spammers,
> what's the point? Spammers were some of the early adopters of SPF to
> legitimize their mail...
and spamassasssin stopped use high scores on user_in_whitelist_spf for the
sam
On Aug 24, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> Cami Sardinha wrote:
>> Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>>> Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd,
>>> does
>>> someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
>>
>> This functionality will not be built in
On Fri, August 24, 2007 15:32, Cami Sardinha wrote:
> This functionality will not be built into Policyd, there is a different
> policy server which does SPF checking.
so the policy of policyd is to not use anything externaly ?
if yes this will delay pypd public a little more :-)
--
Benny Pede
On Fri, August 24, 2007 15:26, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd, does
> someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
policyd-weight planned on the todo list
pypd beta have it weighted
and i belive policyd will olso hav
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:43:31PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> I understand Cami, but I am looking some good software like policyd is,
> for spf checking... :)
SPF is nowhere near the feature scope of policyd. Try Google, it will turn
up quite some alternatives.
Geert
Cami Sardinha wrote:
> Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>> Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd, does
>> someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
>
> This functionality will not be built into Policyd, there is a different
> policy server which does SPF ch
Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd, does
> someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
This functionality will not be built into Policyd, there is a different
policy server which does SPF checking.
Cami
Hello,
Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd, does
someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
Thanks,
/Xavier
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping t
Fernando Schubert wrote:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I`m facing a problem with SENDERTHROTTLE
> I use it to enforce quota in a small mail cluster (8 servers)
> environment. I have large traffic and I`m encountering some problems
> with throttling.
> My defaults are 1000 mails or 40Mb of data in 24 hours
13 matches
Mail list logo
