Hi,
has anyone experienced bad interaction between greylisting and (by default)
low smtpd_hard_error_limit settings in postfix? Our smtpd_hard_error_limit
has always been pretty high so I can't tell from my own experience. But
with greylisting, clients get an error on each RCPT command
Cami Sardinha wrote:
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
Hi,
has anyone experienced bad interaction between greylisting and (by default)
low smtpd_hard_error_limit settings in postfix? Our smtpd_hard_error_limit
has always been pretty high so I can't tell from my own experience. But
with greylisting,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:32:08PM +0200, Cami Sardinha wrote:
As Wietse has pointed out, you should be whitelisting the legitimate bulk
senders..
In an ISP environment, it is not obvious to know all your legitimate smtp
clients...
Geert
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 02:32:08PM +0200, Cami Sardinha wrote:
As Wietse has pointed out, you should be whitelisting the legitimate bulk
senders..
In an ISP environment, it is not obvious to know all your legitimate smtp
clients..
Indeed. We had training mode running
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:27:08PM +0200, Cami Sardinha wrote:
Indeed. We had training mode running for about 2 months in
order to identify the top senders / email addresses. After
that point when people complained, they were whitelisted.
There was a 2 - 3 weeks teething period after going
Geert Hendrickx wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:27:08PM +0200, Cami Sardinha wrote:
Indeed. We had training mode running for about 2 months in
order to identify the top senders / email addresses. After
that point when people complained, they were whitelisted.
There was a 2 - 3 weeks
