8) "The nose of the plane just barely jutted out     into A/E Drive (the street 
that runs around the inside of the building).     It made a perfectly round, 
5-foot hole in the wall. There was one set of     landing gear (presumably from 
the nose) out in A/E Drive. But most     of the plane's skin was in pieces not 
much bigger than a piece of     notebook paper." (From a letter by an employee 
of the Pentagon)      
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/comments-general.html      
      
9) "I thought it was a terrorist bomb. . . .But     then I saw the landing 
gear. It was on the ground in the alley between     the B and C rings. When I 
saw it there, not only did I realize an airplane     had struck the Pentagon 
but it was clear that the plane had come through     the E, D, and C buildings 
to get there." (Paul K. Carlton, Jr., U.S.     Air Force surgeon general, 
quoted by Dean Murphy, "September 11: An     Oral History," p. 216      
      
10) Rep. Ted Tiahrt wrote: "In the C and B rings     the plane had punched a 
hole you could a drive a truck around in, and I     saw an airplane tire. It 
made it very real."      
http://wichita.bizjournals.com/wichita/stories/2002/09/09/story1.html      
      
11) When LTC Victor Correa went back inside the Pentagon,     "he found out 
what caused the horrific attack he survived earlier     that morning; he saw 
the nose cone and the landing gear of     the airliner."      
http://www.army.mil/usar/news/2002/09-11anniv/herotellsall.html

Rosalee Grable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                      
Flight 77, the one that theoretically hit the pentagon, never even took off.
 It was cancelled at least a week in advance, or else it would have been 
originally listed in the BTS database.
 http://iinet.net.au/~holmgren/1177.html
 
DID  AA 77 REALLY HIT THE PENTAGON ? EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS EXAMINED.
 First published June 2002. Posted on this site with minor corrections, January 
2005
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/witness.html
 
 Physical and Mathematical Analysis of the Pentagon Crash 
 http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren/
 INTRODUCTION
 PART 1. PLANE SPECIFICATIONS  
 PART 2. ESTIMATIONS OF HOLE DIMENSIONS 
 PART 3. ENTRY IMPACT CALCULATIONS AT 90 DEGREE FUSELAGE ANGLE 
 PART 4. EXPLOSION ANALYSIS AT 90 DEGREE FUSELAGE ANGLE 
 PART 5. ENTRY CALCULATIONS - FUSELAGE AT 45 DEGREES 
 PART 6. FUEL LOAD ANALYSIS. 
 PART 7. WERE THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DIFFERENT ON SEPT 11?
 PART 8. “BUT WRECKAGE WAS FOUND.” 
 PART 9. DNA TESTING
 PART 10. THE HOLE IN THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL 
 PART 11. WHAT ABOUT THE EYEWITNESSES? 
 SUMMARY 
 
 
 
 Albert Underwood wrote: It should be a relatively simple matter for you to use 
the technique described by Sean McBride on this website to do a semantic search 
and find the dead relatives from the flight.
   
   John Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:        Hey, CNN reported it, not ME 
pal.
      
     But let me ask, where can I find the names and testimony of 'thousands' of 
people who saw something clearly enough to identify it as a 757 while driving 
their cars or as passengers?
      
     Or is that one of our newest 'urban legends'?
     
  
     On 3/30/07, Albert Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:     You seem to 
miss the obvious fact that the pentagon is located at the intersection of a 
number of very busy highways -- a traffic mess called the 'mixing bowl' in the 
DC area -- and that thousands of people saw the event. 
       
       John Stroebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:                                 
                   From another poster, this was included in several links
          
         It is the report by CNN the afternoon of Sept 11, 2001.
          
         This was shown ONCE, then PULLED by CNN.
          
         "NO EVIDENCE OF A PLANE HAVING HIT THE PENTAGON"
          
         See it yourself. For you Bush 911 Report supporters, watch it and THEN 
call the doubters "conspiracy theorists"
          
         http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.tv/altnews.php
         
 -- 
 "... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the 
same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is 
their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new 
Guards for their future security." 
 ***U.S. Declaration of Independence*** 
         
         
          
         
              
        
       
---------------------------------
 Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
 Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.      
     
     
     
 -- 
 "... But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the 
same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is 
their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new 
Guards for their future security." 
 ***U.S. Declaration of Independence***   
   
     
                       

 
---------------------------------
Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and 
always stay connected to friends.

Reply via email to