Re: Social Security vs Pensions

deer in the headlights right now!! > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:00 PM, frankg wrote: > > Studio, > > > "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you > > paid in either retard." > > > Your

Re: Social Security vs Pensions

Studio, "You won't receive your car or home insurance back just because you paid in either retard." Your analogy is seriously flawed. Wealthy or poor, if you drive a car you have the potential to have an accident and need insurance. However, if Social Security worked as you propose, then someone

Re: Really Rich Assaholla Michael Moore Says All Wealthy American's Money is Not Theirs its 'Ours' (Video)

And he's a highly regarded mouthpiece from the left? Ouch! On Mar 2, 9:01 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote: > "these jobs that we collectively own...they just can't take these jobs > that we ow and put them someplace else" > > What an idiot. > > On Mar 2, 3:37 pm, Travis wrote: > > >    

Re: In Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of Our Tumultuous Years.

; see him back! > > KeithInSeoul > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, frankg wrote: > > Bailey?  VT Sean Lewis?   OK, I've run out of ideas.  No, no... > > wait... Tommy News as well.  NOW I'm out of ideas. > > > On Feb 24, 11:45 am, GregfromBoston wrote:

Re: In Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of Our Tumultuous Years.

Bailey? VT Sean Lewis? OK, I've run out of ideas. No, no... wait... Tommy News as well. NOW I'm out of ideas. On Feb 24, 11:45 am, GregfromBoston wrote: > Who on Earth cares beyond, maybe, the Daily Beast? > > On Feb 24, 10:54 am, VT Sean Lewis wrote: > > > Because certain people keep makin

Re: The Tea Party is it a real party? No

Michael, You could be right about term limits, but I do think they would result in two essential changes; politicians would not be making decisions that will help them stay in office, so *maybe* more inclined to do what’s best for ALL the people they represent and with the ‘known’ name no longer o

Re: The Tea Party is it a real party? No

Robert, I would agree with much of what you say, but I’d suggest that the tea party, or any loosely organized group of committed Americans trying to promote change is never a bad thing and is definitely not a hindrance to fixing government. It’s a step in the right direction. If for no other reaso

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

Bob, I thought you were doing pretty good until you got to the end. Republicans and Democrats are co-conspirators in the destruction of this company. They (collectively) reminds me of my brother-in-law, who loves nothing more than enter a room of people, talk some shit, get everyone all riled up,

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

ception, every time some crazy liberal decides to > declare what conservatives believe, they look like drooling idiots. > > On Feb 18, 10:52 am, frankg wrote: > > > Dick, > > > When you consider his opening post, which sought to suggest; > > > - Conservatives believ

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

other with misrepresentation, exaggerations and lies in order to promote their own agenda. On Feb 17, 10:27 pm, dick thompson wrote: >      Frankg, > > He does not dare to answer that because if he answered it honestly all > his arguments would crumble to dust. > > On 02/17/201

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

ny that there ARE people who are unemployed and who are lazy, who do not make an effort to better themselves and who are content on living off government? On Feb 17, 12:26 am, studio wrote: > On Feb 16, 11:36 pm, frankg wrote: > > > And sometimes the > > most important thing you can

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

ry if in the process some honest, hard working people who genuinely need the help lose out as a result, but the answer is to fix the problems that's bleeding the system. On Feb 16, 10:47 pm, studio wrote: > On Feb 16, 10:28 pm, frankg wrote: > > > The fact is some politicians are

Re: Exposed: The lie that led us into Iraq

Tommy, Too funny. How long did it take you to realize you just posted something that, in effect, helped justify Bush's claim that it was faulty intelligence that led to the invasion? Then, true to form, you quickly post a follow-up that basically says 'ah, doesn't matter.. Bush woulda done it any

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

more money at it. On Feb 16, 9:00 pm, studio wrote: > On Feb 15, 1:42 pm, frankg wrote: > > > Michael, > > > > Unemployment is caused (primarily) by Government intervention into the > > > marketplace. > > > It is not a 'democrat' or a '

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

Michael, > Unemployment is caused (primarily) by Government intervention into the > marketplace. > It is not a 'democrat' or a 'republican' only thing as they BOTH do their > share. Couldn't agree more. I'm sure we could have an interesting debate over which Government interventions, by both pa

Re: Conservatives: if your unemployed, you're lazy and uneducated

Studio, > Oh, please do tell us all about Bristols economic theories dick. > While you're doing that, it will also explain them to the 20% > unemployed who may read this. Of course, if Obama's economic policies *did* work, there wouldn't be a "20% unemployed" to explain it to. > "Conservatives:

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

to me. > > On 2/11/11, frankg wrote: > > > Tommy, > > > Can you explain how "The problem is you're so blinded by your bias > > that you can't even tell you're looking into a mirror." is an insult? > > Blinded by bias, as in anyone

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

avoiding it because it exposes the > hypocritical nature of the poll?". > > That sounds like another officious hateful personal insult, to me. > Another violation of the group rules by you. > > On 2/10/11, frankg wrote: > > > Are you really so ignorant that you are u

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

Yeah, I guess that was kinda harsh, huh? On Feb 11, 8:14 am, GregfromBoston wrote: > And a second challenge to you.. point out where in this thread I made > hateful insults to you or anyone else. > - > > You said, "mirror", you hateful son of a bitch! -- Thanks f

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

e mirror, as it > may well shatter if you do. > > On 2/6/11, frankg wrote: > > > > > Tommy, > > > As previously noted, the responses from this poll are absolutely no > > different than the responses given by Democrats during Bush's final > > six years

Re: Obama Says Corporation Have to Share Benefits, Profits and Bonuses with Workers

They may not be granted this authority via the Constitution, but just like mandatory health care insurance, they believe they can impose their will on anyone via the IRS. Just tax 'em into submission is their motto. On Feb 10, 12:04 pm, GregfromBoston wrote: > Thats a good way to lose an election

Re: Obama Says Corporation Have to Share Benefits, Profits and Bonuses with Workers

 John Kerry even proposed it in 2004.  Nada. > > > > Of course, it does fit the definition of what most dems would call, > > > "corporate welfare", but hopefully even they would get on board, and > > > any GOPer who objected, I'd rip a new one for with

Re: Obama Says Corporation Have to Share Benefits, Profits and Bonuses with Workers

Once upon a time corporations fought for the best talent. In order to recruit, win and retain this talent they needed to offer great salaries, wonderful benefits, etc. Competition between corporations drove the stakes up in favor of the employee. Today, companies can give a rats ass about talent o

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

such a mess.  I would bet that Kantrowitz is a socialist also, but there > >> can be no doubt that Kantrowitz has posted a hate filled prevaricate > >> rhetorical post, and this is an example of what he teaches his pupils. > > >> Who took this poll?   Who were the particip

Re: Bush-Appointed Federal Judge Tosses Out Challenge To Health Reform

r se. But it is > not silent, of course, on government powers and their limits, and > that's where the controversial interpretations pertaining to health > care reform originate. > > The U.S. Constitution says the government can't force you to buy > anything. Or at least,

Re: I Think, Therefore I am Not

Tommy, Change the names of the talking heads and politicians, replace ACORN stealing the election to simply stealing the election, replace socialist with communist, impeached can stay in there, replace "wants the terrorists to win" with "9/11 was an inside job", etc., and we could be discussing wh

Re: Bush-Appointed Federal Judge Tosses Out Challenge To Health Reform

Tommy, You *didn't* answer the objection, you repeated the flawed argument of someone else. Katz doesn't attempt to argue the federal insurance mandate is supported by the Constitution, but rather, suggests the framers simply didn't realize it needed to be there. To rule in favor of the law would

Re: The White House Jihadist, Obama, Stands by Muslim Brotherhood Endorsement

Tommy, "That amounts to the blood shed in Tucson and in other Reich wing shootings..." Damn, but you are slow to learn. You still of the belief that the world is flat or has that one finally sunk in? On Feb 4, 6:01 pm, Tommy News wrote: > Markie Mark- > > Michelle Bachmann has told her "followe

Re: The White House Jihadist, Obama, Stands by Muslim Brotherhood Endorsement

Tommy, Why don't you just google "homosexuality islam" and begin reading. Simply saying Mark and Keith are wrong does not make it so. Here are a couple of excerpts; ** From Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ LGBT_topics_and_Islam) ** Given the vagueness of the Qur'an regarding the punish

Re: Good News! Wall Street bonuses up 5.7% - $135 billion

Seems kind of silly debating who is the worst offender. As many of us know, they are all corrupt -- all bought and paid for. Do we excuse the corruption of one party because the other party is even *more* corrupt. They can all go to hell! On Feb 3, 8:07 pm, plainolamerican wrote: > Then why would

Re: Let’s Tear Apart Newt Gingrich’s Homophobic Gay Marriage Logic!

Tommy, Aside from the "well if they're the same..." argument -- if a civil union had exactly the same legal rights as a marriage, would that be acceptable to you? On Feb 2, 8:43 pm, Tommy News wrote: > Newt Bedhopper Frogrich is a Homophobic Adulterous Hypocrite! > > Let’s Tear Apart Newt Gingr

Re: More Violence and Threats Of Murder From The RACIST Leftists.... And the beat goes on and on and on......

Tommy, I hardly see where this is original. To recap; a right leaning author is stupid, and all (or, in this case, 'most') of the hate, racism, phobes, and un-American talking heads come from the right. You sound like all the other far-lefties. But glad to see you're at least thinking about posti

Re: The Dire Consequences of Health Care Reform Repeal, But Republican Hypocrites With Government Coverage Do Not Care

t. > > One need not be a Constitutional scholar (and I hasten to note: I am > not!) to know that the Constitution was silent on health care > insurance for the same reason it was silent on inter-stellar travel. > Such concerns were not part of the world in which the document wa

Re: The Neocon Take on Egypt

Studio, Not a Bolton fan, but lets be clear here.. he called the Muslim Brotherhood radicals, not the Egyptian protesters. On Feb 1, 6:57 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 31, 12:49 am, studio wrote: > > > On Jan 30, 9:22 pm, MJ wrote:> The Neocon Take on > > EgyptPosted byThomas DiLorenzoon January

Re: The Dire Consequences of Health Care Reform Repeal, But Republican Hypocrites With Government Coverage Do Not Care

7;m a cold, heartless bastard. On Feb 1, 6:52 pm, frankg wrote: > Well, still not an original thought, but not a silly, pointless quote > either. > > The premise of this article is, however, chilling. Katz's argument is > that the framers of the Constitution could not pre

Re: The Dire Consequences of Health Care Reform Repeal, But Republican Hypocrites With Government Coverage Do Not Care

Well, still not an original thought, but not a silly, pointless quote either. The premise of this article is, however, chilling. Katz's argument is that the framers of the Constitution could not predict issues the country would face more than 200 years after it was drafted, and therefore it's up t

Re: ObamaCare Unconstitutional -- Read The Ruling

Keith, Was about to reply to Mark's comments in another Obamacare thread where Tommy used the same quote. I don't think I'll bother now. I gotta laugh at a guy running around asserting that people are lying - when those people are posting actual quotes, court statements/rulings, and documented fac

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

and buy you a beer. Till then, try thinking in something other than two dimensional terms. Your answer to everything is more taxes on the wealthy, and when someone doesn't agree with you, you automatically assume and label. On Jan 31, 3:53 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 31, 11:00 am, frankg

Re: Laughing your head off in Liberal Land

As there are several articles written by Jack Kemp after Jack Kemp, the congressman from NY, died, one can only conclude this is not - that- Jack Kemp. Nice. I can't wait to hear how Tommy or Studio will dismiss this one. On Jan 31, 10:46 am, Keith In Köln wrote: > Uhm..Did Jack write this f

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

Studio, You cite the widely available '16 points of doom and gloom', but they are merely the effect, not the cause. The wealthy continue to get wealthy because our trade system is broken. Low and middle class Americans are competing for good paying jobs with people in other countries who do the s

Re: Sarah Palin about the SOTU, jobs and the economy

Tommy: Right wing fear rhetoric indeed contributes to violence and hatred, as we have seen over and over again, most recently in Tucson. Keith: Not only is it a hateful smear and a lie to say that "right wing fear rhetoric contributes to violence and hatred, as we have seen in Tucson"; it is also

Re: Pelosi on the SOTU - what a liar she is!!

h. > You really are a little jerk, arem't you? > > Go take a hike, and get lost you prissy self absorbed wing nut. > > On 1/29/11, frankg wrote: > > > > > Keith, > > > You don't seriously expect an answer, do you?  I can't remember the > >

Re: Obama Gaffes: Confuses Iraq with Afghanistan

Tommy, As you said... "Remember Dubya!" I'm willing to bet you weren't citing Dutch proverbs back when the liberal media was having a field day on every Bush gaffe. You had an opportunity to take the high road but you just couldn't do it. Clearly Obama knows the difference between Iraq and Afghan

Re: Pelosi on the SOTU - what a liar she is!!

Keith, You don't seriously expect an answer, do you? I can't remember the last time, if ever, that I saw Tommy post a complete, original thought. His response to the opening post is typical -- calling FNC liars. Well, it was a flippin interview, by Greta no less. She didn't accuse or try to catch

Re: 91% of Americans Approve of Obama’s State Of The Union Speech

m, Tommy News wrote: > Frankie- > > OK, let's review. > > Burtt out and MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS! > > Keith attacked ME! > > On 1/27/11, frankg wrote: > > > > > Tommy, > > > OK, lets review; > > > You wrote: "In response to your

Re: 91% of Americans Approve of Obama’s State Of The Union Speech

you read the > >> address, or listen to it carefully on line here, with an open mind, > >> and you will perhaps then see why 91 per cent of polled Americans > >> approve of the address. > > >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZdEmjtF6HE > > >> Stop the

Re: 91% of Americans Approve of Obama’s State Of The Union Speech

ice.  He thinks calling people Nazi's and whining about name > calling is rational. > > Time, perhaps some meds and therapy. > > >On Jan 27, 1:00 pm, frankg wrote: > > Actually, I'm pretty sure that Keith took a minor shot at Studio and > > then pointed out tha

Re: 91% of Americans Approve of Obama’s State Of The Union Speech

Actually, I'm pretty sure that Keith took a minor shot at Studio and then pointed out that the author of the editorial you pasted here is far left wing. I don't think he said anything about the SOTU address. This is how you get into trouble Tommy, you read what you want to read, not what is written

Re: Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate

Jonathan, I would say that Adam’s affidavit is not proof positive, but it’s definitely not meaningless. When you consider Obama’s refusal to just provide the long form certificate to end speculation, this affidavit does have the potential to make an open minded person question whether he really wa

Re: 6 Lunatics Inspired by Fox News and Glenn Beck

Did Barack Obama's Violent Rhetoric Inspire Mass Murder In Arizona? http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.blogspot.com/2011/01/did-barack-obamas-violent-rhetoric.html Well, using the very same standard the left wing, and their corrupt media partners have used to smear and slander Sarah Palin, all evid

Re: The Truth:

"...who gives away free Health Care." No, he wants to give away very expensive health care, paid for by hard working American taxpayers. If it were free I don't think anyone would have an issue with it. On Jan 23, 11:55 am, Tommy News wrote: > The Truth: > President Obama is *not* a brown skinn

Re: Fox Government News

Studio, Many professional athletes have clauses in their contracts preventing them from participating in 'high risk' activities, activities that their employers are free to enjoy. The athlete has every right to participate in these high risk activities, but contractually they can not. Freedom of s

Re: Poor Sarah Palin, she's a nervous wreck

> nothing but a conservative love-fest, and if I can, I'll expose it for what > it is...BS. It's not your crashing of any Conservative 'love-fest' that I question, it's your unflinching support for everything put forth by Democrats, be it policy, legislation or

Re: Poor Sarah Palin, she's a nervous wreck

Funny Studio. I've mentioned on this forum numerous times I'm a registered Independent who doesn't trust any politician yet you frequently have insisted I'm Republican. Guess that makes you a tard? What the hell is a tard anyway. I would have guessed you were a Democrat because you rant incessantl

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

other hand, can't help but fabricate bullshit because well, because that's just who you are. On Jan 19, 4:58 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 19, 3:53 pm, frankg wrote: > > > Studio, > > > your chaotic, painful spin at logic almost defies belief. > > No spin to fac

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

aring on your part keeps you hearing anything that doesn't fit your sick spin. I can't help you there, sorry. Open mindedness is an individual thing and you have to want it to achieve it. On Jan 19, 3:17 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 18, 11:57 pm, frankg wrote: > > > Studio, &g

Re: Parade route bomb...more Republitard murder tactics

Good lord Studio, don't you ever learn? I would have hoped you would have learned something after trying to blame the Loughner rampage on Palin and Republicans, only to discover there was no connection at all. But nope, you'll just continue to throw bullshit against the wall and hope something stic

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

> I'm still waiting for an explanation of how I made Giffords the > victim. Correction.. I'm still waiting for an explanation of how I was blaming the victim, Giffords. Actually, while you're at it, please explain what I was blaming her for. On Jan 18, 11:57 pm, fr

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

Studio, > Then shouldn't he be telling Palin NOT to take the target list off her > Web site? If Palin had asked me I would most definitely have advised her there was no need to pull the map. There was nothing wrong with it. If you, like the rest of the Democratic party, believed a map with bulls-

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

f you can't even comprehend simple concepts. On Jan 18, 10:37 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 18, 2:47 pm, frankg wrote: > > > I would have no problem telling Congresswoman Giffords that she was > > wrong to complain about what Palin did ... > > omg blame the victim your pa

Re: Giffords warned Palin of consequences

OK, and I have to add... wear bulls-eyes on your shirts because the Democrats and MSM have confirmed these don't mean your a target. On Jan 18, 3:03 pm, Bruce Majors wrote: > hey stupio a wild tea partier in south central LA just walked into a school > and shot a bunch of kids > > go over and se

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

usations. What most Americans aren't buying are the accusations being made by the Left in a desperate attempt to tie the rampage to people on the Right. Even you should know that by now. On Jan 18, 2:11 pm, studio wrote: > On Jan 18, 2:00 pm, frankg wrote: > > > Even if the thinking

Re: Prophetic warning from Giffords to Palin

Even if the thinking at the time the map was put together was to use cross-hairs, is it really any different than the bulls-eyes used in Democratic ad's? Both symbols are there to convey the exact same point; a district perceived to be weak and to be focused on. It's being disingenuous to suggest a

Re: Tragedy in Arizona

Dick, Keith, you really are wasting your time. Tommy has yet to ever post a single original thought. He's pulling other people's content from far left websites and posting here to get a rouse. If there was a significant percentage of the population that even remotely considered this tripe as factua

Re: Drowning in a Sea of Right Wing Extremism, Prejudice, and Bigotry

But Tommy, if you're interested in balanced discussion you really need to stop parrot writings from the far left. Consider this opening post... * Border security.. a problem that was every bit a hot button under Bush as it is under Obama. The people doing the patrolling are not anti-immigrant vigi

Re: This so called "Political Forum" group is a pathetic group of evil Reich wing haters and liars.

Tommy, you really should learn to accept a little constructive criticism. Honestly, you can't come here posting nothing but extreme left wing rhetoric, use childish name calling, not post anything that could be considered original and relevant and then expect people to not be critical of you. If y

Re: President Obama calls gay intern Daniel Hernandez, who helped save Giffords' life a hero

o are trying to ride Hernandez's > coat tails and trying to bask in his heroism who are pushing for his > gayness being an issue. > > On 01/13/2011 04:43 PM, frankg wrote: > > > What makes them second class?  Hernandez seems to be doing extremely > > well with his li

Re: President Obama calls gay intern Daniel Hernandez, who helped save Giffords' life a hero

:02 pm, Tommy News wrote: > Frank- > > Gays and LBTs are indeed second class, unequal citizens. > That is the truth, and it is indeed a shame. > Hernandez is openly gay, and is not ashamed of that. > You should be ashamed for insisting that he hide it and go back in the closet. &g

Re: President Obama calls gay intern Daniel Hernandez, who helped save Giffords' life a hero

It's a shame a member of the gay community is calling him a second class citizen. I've not heard anyone from the heterosexual community say anything like that... they all seem to be quite content treating him as a genuine hero and overall good guy. In fact, if not for the gay community calling him

Re: The Giffords shooting's gay, Hispanic hero Daniel Henandez ---- and yes, his sexuality and ethnicity matter

Travis, It's a gay pride thing. NOW would probably have done the same for Patricia Maisch but I guess they have a little more self-confidence than some in the gay community. On Jan 11, 1:50 pm, Travis wrote: > Why?  It has nothing to do with what he did. I have seen his story in the > good news

Re: Left Renews Calls for "Fairness Doctrine" in Wake of Cogresswoman Giffords' Shooting

Someone posted the following collection of quotes on another discussion board. I would prefer to see the hate stop from both sides, but since most of the comments are coming from the left, referring to the right as the party of hate, I find these quotes a little ironic. - Democratic Rep. Fortney "

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

al. On Jan 11, 1:42 pm, Tommy News wrote: > Disagreeable and Negative are synonymous. > > Cynical is self explanatory. > > On 1/11/11, frankg wrote: > > > And there you go making unfounded comments. Point out where/how I am > > being negative and cynical. Disagreeabl

Re: Reagan; Dubya; Orange Boner, Cryer of the House...

Wow, that's an awful lot of hate coming from someone on the left who is always bitching about the hate coming from the right. On Jan 11, 1:24 pm, Tommy News wrote: > Speaking of Crystal Balls, It is well known that grade "D" actress and > fashion plate Nancy Davis Reagan and her "psychic" friends

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

Jan 11, 1:09 pm, Tommy News wrote: > There you go being negative, cynical, and disagreeable yet again. > > On 1/11/11, frankg wrote: > > > Where have I been negative and where have I been cynical? > > > I said her conclusion is wrong and explained why. That's not b

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

e > next to him in battle, or stand before their community and declare > their love, or go to school, or walk down the street without being > asked for paperwork needs to hear that and remember that, again and > again until it sinks in. Yes, the "gay Hispanic American" saved a

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

ffords Shooting, Will Picket Funerals > > >http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/westboro_baptists_t... > > > LGBT Groups Rally Around Congresswoman Giffords > > >http://www.edenfantasys.com/sexis/sex-and-society/lgbt-groups-rally-g... > > > On 1/

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 Year old intern, may have saved Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

Tommy, Where is your evidence that anyone from the right had any influence over this guy? The evidence that is out there at this point shows him to be from the left, and with a very old obsession with Gifford. You're proud a gay guy performed a heroic deed -- good for you. I suspect most people

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

Baptists Thank God For Giffords Shooting, Will Picket Funerals > > http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/westboro_baptists_t... > > LGBT Groups Rally Around Congresswoman Giffords > > http://www.edenfantasys.com/sexis/sex-and-society/lgbt-groups-rally-g... > > On 1/11/11, f

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 year old intern, likely saved Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

What's with starting a second, identical thread on the same article? And the fact remains, you cited an article that never once mentions his being gay, yet you made that a big point of the thread title and opening comment. Why did you do that? It has no bearing on what happened. Is this some sort

Re: Daniel Hernandez, gay 20 Year old intern, may have saved Gabrielle Giffords' life with first aid

Tommy, Truly an amazing story and thank God he was there and thought quickly/ clearly. However, I'm curious why you felt the need to highlight his being gay? I don't see it as part of the 'story' nor is it mentioned in the article you cited. On Jan 10, 10:02 am, Tommy News wrote: > Daniel Hernan

Re: OK, I'm taking bets.....

Everyone needs to get out of the weeds and address the bigger problem. It is of little importance whether Republicans fail to honor promises made or that Democrats don't even make the promises. The problem is government continues to grow regardless of which of the two major parties is in control. T

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

ecause you can't defend what has happened. Are you related to little mikie? This is how he 'debated'. On Jun 21, 11:54 am, euwe wrote: > That's not the point euwe, and you know it. > - > Then why lead with it? > > On Jun 21, 10:36 am, frankg wrote: &g

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

h Bush, who undercut the authority > of law. The idea that was put forth is that the Coast Guard has no > right to pull a barge out of action when the captain can't be located, > and it does not have the proper mandated life saving and fire fighting > equipment. Life is more

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

euwe, This discussion of Cheney is nothing more than your ongoing effort to deflect from or obfuscate the real issue, which is that the Obama administration has, on more than a dozen occasions, slowed or blocked efforts to clean up the oil spill. You've proven your political agenda is more importa

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

s a safety inspection - you deal with it after the fire is out. On Jun 19, 8:25 am, euwe wrote: > No, they shut them down because they didn't have the proper life > saving or fire fighting equipment. They ALSO could not find the > captains. > > On Jun 18, 9:33 pm, frankg w

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

not meet the EPA requirements, BP was the one that > said they didn't need them, and wouldn't pay for them. > > On Jun 18, 9:33 pm, frankg wrote: > > > > > > Life is more important than property. > > > Very true but not applicable in this case. They shut

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

til it was safe. Life is more important than > property. > > On Jun 18, 2:05 pm, frankg wrote: > > > > > This is utter nonsense. So if my house is on fire but my fire > > extinguisher doesn't have a proper regulator, I should not use it and > > allow the hou

Re: Obama stops clean up to create bigger disaster

This is utter nonsense. So if my house is on fire but my fire extinguisher doesn't have a proper regulator, I should not use it and allow the house to burn down? The barges should have been allowed to continue to do their thing while inspections and/or corrections were made in parallel. This is ju

Re: The realities behind the immigration debate

> Arizona’s new immigration policy, which requires aliens to carry immigration > papers and directs the police to detain “suspected aliens,” That is NOT Arizona's new policy. The new policy allows police to detain people when they are suspected of criminal activity and who, in the course of being

Re: Uncivilized Republican monkeys

people are cheating and exploiting the system, as long as you can find one more needy person you think the answer is always to throw more money at it. Sorry, but I beg to differ. It is because the government makes all of these programs so easy to obtain that people become unmotivated to ge

Re: Uncivilized Republican monkeys

of embryonic stem cell research was much ado about nothing, but whatever. Greed exists regardless of party. Prices continue to rise under Democratic control. You can pretend these issues are the sole domain of the Republican party but you’d only be fooling yourself. Neither party is worth the powder

Re: Uncivilized Republican monkeys

pm, studio wrote: > On Apr 20, 12:28 pm, Zebnick wrote: > > > Republicans give far more money to charity than Democrats do. Liberals > > only like to give OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY to charity. > > No, they don't. > You get that from Conservative Web sites, not fro

Re: Uncivilized Republican monkeys

Studio, It figures it wouldn't make sense to you. You understand taking from those who work hard and redistributing to those who don't, but the idea that the well could run dry as a result of your actions never crosses your mind. On Apr 19, 9:56 pm, studio wrote: > On Apr 19, 1:

Re: Uncivilized Republican monkeys

And in your socialist world those ten bananas were taken from three hard working monkeys. Soon, those hard working monkeys say screw it, they’re tired of doing all the work, and decide to only collect one banana each for themselves. Seven moneys die from starvation. Oops. On Apr 19, 12:52 pm, stud

Re: The Tea Party is really about four things: Fear, Anger, Power and Change

What horseshit. People are angry over a government that has grown out of control. People are angry at out of control spending. People are angry at the massive debt this government is ringing up. People are angry at the state of the economy and the rate of unemployment. White males helped put Obama

Re: Less regulation = more deaths...and Republicans love it when people die

Studio, Failure to enforce regulations is hardly a case for needing more regulation. In this case there were plenty of regulations in place that may have prevented this. What was lacking was enforcement of existing regulations. Enforcement of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act is by the Mine S

Re: Glenn Bleech: professional buffoon

Ladybugs, As you can see, they are not interested in seeing. But be honest, the far right does the same thing. In this case, they are working with a snipet, taken out of context, and trying to build on their anti-Beck movement. Here's another example of Beck; “I want you to know that even some m

Re: Beck's Call For Mob Violence

gun ownership? > > calling for the impeachment of bush is not the same as inciting > violence against a group of many millions...which means you did not > answer the question... > > who specifically is calling for violence against beck watchers? > > I await for the answer fr

Re: Beck's Call For Mob Violence

entless pursuit of the progressives he feels are so destructive, his stated objective is to "expose them". Whole lotta violence going on there. The biggest thing I have going for my argument is that he hasn't called for violence, period. On Mar 9, 7:51 pm, Hollywood wrote: > Fran

Re: Beck's Call For Mob Violence

ry. You choose to view these things as a call to violence, but that is hardly the only possible interpretation. On Mar 9, 6:20 pm, Hollywood wrote: > frankg, > > I've already explained that. Refute the logic and reasoning of that > statement. Don't care what the thread t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >