21/09/15 18:41, David Matthews wrote:
On 21/09/2015 16:08, Phil Clayton wrote:
What I am actually observing is that finalizers are not run on exit for
finalizable values that are in scope in the top-level environment. On
exit, the REPL has finished, so shouldn't such values be garbage
On 21/09/2015 06:49, Artella Coding wrote:
Hi, thanks for the pointers on the ffi.
"I strongly suspect that SML functions like IntArray.update take less time
than the FFI overhead, so no improvement is possible by using C functions."
Yes it seems so. I was hoping that I could somehow achieve
On 21/09/2015 16:08, Phil Clayton wrote:
What I am actually observing is that finalizers are not run on exit for
finalizable values that are in scope in the top-level environment. On
exit, the REPL has finished, so shouldn't such values be garbage
collected and therefore finalized?
I noticed
Thanks. Someone (just now) on stackoverflow suggested doing a search for
the unsafe keyword, which led me to "unsafeSub" and "unsafeUpdate". When I
add these function definitions to my program the timings do indeed reduce
from 52s to 32s.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:10 PM, David Matthews <
