On 2021-Jul-2, at 22:03, Mark Millard wrote:
> The later below is copied from the page shown bu the url in
> the subject. The last 3 lines show "Sat Jul 03 2021" dates
> for messages I'd sent today. An interesting point is that
> the date and subject lists do not show them but the author
> lis
The later below is copied from the page shown bu the url in
the subject. The last 3 lines show "Sat Jul 03 2021" dates
for messages I'd sent today. An interesting point is that
the date and subject lists do not show them but the author
list also shows them.
• llvm10 build failure on Rpi3
On 2021-Jul-2, at 19:23, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> I just noticed that in several prior messasges I quoted the llvm-tblgen
> command that generates the *.inc files with the odd contents instead
> of the later compile that tried to use the output files in question.
>
> This leaves open the possi
http://www.zefox.org/~bob/poudriere/bulk.log shows that you had
the RPi3b (whatever variant) with the following builders (jobs)
going in parallel as of whe llvm10 reported the failure:
. . .
[00:03:20] Building 81 packages using 4 builders
. . .
[00:07:07] [04] [00:00:00] Building lang/rust | rust
I just noticed that in several prior messasges I quoted the llvm-tblgen
command that generates the *.inc files with the odd contents instead
of the later compile that tried to use the output files in question.
This leaves open the possibility that I had incorrectly checked on if
the build had fail
From: bob prohaska wrote on
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:08:12 -0700 :
> There's an option to
> SAVE_WRKDIR=yes
> in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf
>
> What is its intended use?
It avoids having to remember to type -w on the
poudriere bulk command line.
Both cause a crash in the jail to produce a
There's an option to
SAVE_WRKDIR=yes
in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf
What is its intended use? In particular,
can it be used to pick up a failed build
close to the point where it stopped?
There's no obvious reference to SAVE_WRKDIR
in the man page and a web search came up
empty in terms of what
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
--- describe.astro ---
--- describe.audio ---
--- describe.benchmarks ---
--- describe.biology ---
--- describe.cad ---
--- describe.chinese ---
--- d
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:33 AM @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
> > On 02 Jul 2021, at 00:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM @lbutlr wrote:
> >
> >> On 01 Jul 2021, at 16:45, The Doctor wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:21:31PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> The current ver
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
> On 02 Jul 2021, at 00:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> On 01 Jul 2021, at 16:45, The Doctor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 04:21:31PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
The current version of dovecot is 2.3.15. The newest ports version is
>> 2.3.
12 matches
Mail list logo