FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2022-04-12 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: [RFC] patch's default backup behavior

2022-04-12 Thread Chris
On 2022-04-08 20:25, Kyle Evans wrote: Hello! FreeBSD's patch follows historical patch(1) behavior w.r.t. backups, where a backup is created for every file patched. I'd like to test the waters on switching this to the GNU behavior, which feels a whole lot more reasonable. Notably, they'll only

Re: Boost ports version

2022-04-12 Thread Charlie Li
Kurt Jaeger wrote: The various boost ports (C++ libraries) available are currently on upstream version 1.72 whereas the current release would be 1.78. I'd like to understand whether there is a technical reason for the FreeBSD ports being "so far behind"? Somewhat, yes. There's a PR for the

Re: Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Faraz Vahedi
Hello Rodrigo, > sysutils/dust and www/vultr-cli are done. Just for the record > there is a typo in your commit message, there is no "_" in > Differential Revision. Ah, my apologies. OK, I'll take care of it as of now. Thank you so much. Cheers, Faraz signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Faraz Vahedi
Hello Fernando, > Hi Faraz, thanks for your work! My pleasure. > I suppose at least the last one will need the two weeks courtesy > period to see if the maintainer chimes in. > > I personally prefer bugzilla's PR to deal with port updates. That way > we can link PR's to one another. For instanc

Re: Boost ports version

2022-04-12 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > The various boost ports (C++ libraries) available are currently on upstream > version 1.72 whereas the current release would be 1.78. > > I'd like to understand whether there is a technical reason for the FreeBSD > ports being "so far behind"? Somewhat, yes. There's a PR for the update:

Boost ports version

2022-04-12 Thread jbo
Hello folks, The various boost ports (C++ libraries) available are currently on upstream version 1.72 whereas the current release would be 1.78. I'd like to understand whether there is a technical reason for the FreeBSD ports being "so far behind"? Best regards, ~ Joel

Re: Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Rodrigo Osorio
On 4/12/22 13:24, Rodrigo Osorio wrote: On 4/12/22 12:50, Faraz Vahedi wrote: Greetings, Could anyone please commit and land the following list of my diffs? They're all tested, approved, and ready to land. D34816: sysutils/dust: Update to v0.8.0 Start with sysutils/dust D34

Re: Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Fernando ApesteguĂ­a
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 2:51 PM Faraz Vahedi wrote: > > Greetings, > > Could anyone please commit and land the following list of my > diffs? They're all tested, approved, and ready to land. Hi Faraz, thanks for your work! > > D34816: sysutils/dust: Update to v0.8.0 > D34817: www/

Re: Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Rodrigo Osorio
On 4/12/22 12:50, Faraz Vahedi wrote: Greetings, Could anyone please commit and land the following list of my diffs? They're all tested, approved, and ready to land. D34816: sysutils/dust: Update to v0.8.0 Start with sysutils/dust D34817: www/vultr-cli: Update to v2.12.2

Could anyone help me land a few approved diffs, please?

2022-04-12 Thread Faraz Vahedi
Greetings, Could anyone please commit and land the following list of my diffs? They're all tested, approved, and ready to land. D34816: sysutils/dust: Update to v0.8.0 D34817: www/vultr-cli: Update to v2.12.2 D34818: devel/wrangler: Update to v1.19.11 D34843: lang/