Tomek CEDRO wrote on
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 03:02:30 UTC :
> By the way, make buildworld -j8 failed, but make buildworld (no -j
> switch) works although takes much more time. Is there any way to speed
> up the build process? I have MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=8 already set in
> /etc/make.conf.
There are m
Thanks for your suggestion. Kitty does not depends on pycrypto from the start
so I'm unsure how to use your advice.
I've tried to add pycryptodome to BUILD_DEPENDS with :
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pycryptodome>0:security/py-pycryptodome@${PY_FLAVOR}
or even openssl to LIB_DEPENDS with
libcrypto.p
Hi,
After an upgrade in the upstream version of the port, I can no longer compile
it using poudriere. Resulting error message is :
Package libcrypto was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libcrypto.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment vari
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
I have 32GB RAM and 100GB swap, If -j should work problem is somewhere
else, will investigate, thanks :-)
Do you know if kernel build use variables from /etc/make.conf (i.e.
possible jobs number = -jN)? If does not seem so :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Thanks!
чт, 8 сент. 2022 г., 11:31 Antoine Brodin :
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:10 AM Antoine Brodin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:54 AM Stefan Esser wrote:
> > >
> > > Am 08.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Vasily Postnicov:
> > > > Hi! My port tree is on commit 9c85fa7 and my FreeBSD version i
> On 8. Sep 2022, at 05:03, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:52 PM Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> On 5. Sep 2022, at 22:45, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>> Hello world :-)
>> After `git pull` I get this warning now on each port build:
>> /!\ ERROR: /!\
>> Ports Collection support for your F
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:10 AM Antoine Brodin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:54 AM Stefan Esser wrote:
> >
> > Am 08.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Vasily Postnicov:
> > > Hi! My port tree is on commit 9c85fa7 and my FreeBSD version is
> > > 13.1-RELEASE.
> > > It seems that after recent changes to
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:54 AM Stefan Esser wrote:
>
> Am 08.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Vasily Postnicov:
> > Hi! My port tree is on commit 9c85fa7 and my FreeBSD version is
> > 13.1-RELEASE.
> > It seems that after recent changes to the ports (moving of WWW entries to
> > Makefiles) `make index` has
Am 08.09.22 um 09:41 schrieb Vasily Postnicov:
Hi! My port tree is on commit 9c85fa7 and my FreeBSD version is 13.1-RELEASE.
It seems that after recent changes to the ports (moving of WWW entries to
Makefiles) `make index` has become broken.
Here are the last lines of `make index`:
--- describ
Hi! My port tree is on commit 9c85fa7 and my FreeBSD version is
13.1-RELEASE. It seems that after recent changes to the ports (moving of
WWW entries to Makefiles) `make index` has become broken.
Here are the last lines of `make index`:
--- describe.www ---
--- describe.x11 ---
--- describe.x11-clo
Am 08.09.22 um 03:59 schrieb Kubilay Kocak:
On 7/09/2022 4:09 am, Stefan Esser wrote:
PortMgr has just accepted a change that has been in the making for some time:
The move of the "WWW:" entries at the end of the ports' pkg-descr files into
the ports' Makefiles in the form of "WWW=" definitions
12 matches
Mail list logo
