Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po

Re: 266880 – Bugzilla: See Also: allow FreshPorts URLs

On 18/07/2023 15:04, Felix Palmen wrote: * Graham Perrin [20230718 08:18]: "Bugzilla: See Also: …" (in the summary line) means the "See Also:" field of Bugzilla. <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266880#field_label_see_also> anchors to the See Als

Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles

On 19/07/2023 00:28, Chris wrote: On 2023-07-18 00:05, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 9:02 AM Graham Perrin wrote: On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > … Would you say that requesting maintainers-feedback when reporting an > issue with a port is common sense

Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles

On 2023-07-18 00:05, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 9:02 AM Graham Perrin wrote: On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > … Would you say that requesting maintainers-feedback when reporting an > issue with a port is common sense? … Yes. Common sense, and automate

Re: commiter needed for pecl-imagick merge (6 and 7) PR 268833

* Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> [20230718 09:41]: > Ping. > Please, can somebody check it and commit it? Please. Took it. Will take a while to test... Cheers, Felix -- Felix Palmen {private} fe...@palmen-it.de -- ports committer -- {web} http://

Re: 266880 – Bugzilla: See Also: allow FreshPorts URLs

* Graham Perrin [20230718 08:18]: > "Bugzilla: See Also: …" (in the summary line) means the "See Also:" field of > Bugzilla. > > <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266880#field_label_see_also> > anchors to the See Also: field for 26688

Re: commiter needed for pecl-imagick merge (6 and 7) PR 268833

Ping. Please, can somebody check it and commit it? Please. On 04/07/2023 23:17, Miroslav Lachman wrote: For historic reason there are pecl-imagick depending on ImageMagick 6 and pecl-imagick-im7 depending on ImageMagick 7. As far as I know no ports depend on pecl-imagick with ImageMagic 6 by d

FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles: fixing documentation

On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: … When conflicting instructions are present, then we should fix the documentation. … True. The silence, or near-silence, in Phabricator is sometimes deafening. To the people who wonder why is no

266880 – Bugzilla: See Also: allow FreshPorts URLs

On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: … I read https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266880 and I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. … "Bugzilla: See Also: …" (in the summary line) means the "See Also:" field of Bugzilla.

Re: FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 9:02 AM Graham Perrin wrote: > On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > … Would you say that requesting maintainers-feedback when reporting an > > issue with a port is common sense? … > > Yes. > > Common sense, and automated sense, because in the vast majority o

FreeBSD bugzilla, bureaucracy and obstacles

On 18/07/2023 07:29, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: … Would you say that requesting maintainers-feedback when reporting an issue with a port is common sense? … Yes. Common sense, and automated sense, because in the vast majority of cases (i.e. commonplace), the request is automated. Worth menti