Hi Nuno,
> On 22 Feb 2024, at 11:43, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
>
> I did take a look at review and noticed that TEST_DEPENDS are not used
> and that could means that test target works without any depends or
> ports are not tested at all.
> My curiosity is what do you think about the importance (or no
On 2024-02-23 08:30, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message <787339cd-48e4-49bf-b96e-77aab06ce...@freebsd.org>, Rodrigo
Osorio w
rites:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
On 23/02/24 16:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with
> shells/
Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
On 2024-02-23 02:29, Gleb Popov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 1:19 PM Gleb Popov wrote:
Ahoy there fellow porters!
portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
It is quite a tedious process, as you
In message <787339cd-48e4-49bf-b96e-77aab06ce...@freebsd.org>, Rodrigo
Osorio w
rites:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> On 23/02/24 16:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with
> > shells/ksh as our default ksh depend
On 23/02/24 16:54, Cy Schubert wrote:
Hi,
Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with
shells/ksh as our default ksh dependency? Or Uses/ksh.mk to select a
default ksh for ports?
The reason I ask is, shells/ksh has its lineage from the original AT&T ksh
(shells/ksh93) and i
Hi,
Would there be any interest in either replacing shells/pdksh with
shells/ksh as our default ksh dependency? Or Uses/ksh.mk to select a
default ksh for ports?
The reason I ask is, shells/ksh has its lineage from the original AT&T ksh
(shells/ksh93) and is being actively developed (see shell
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
> Hi Dan.
>
> The list of subpackages is available via `make -V SUBPACKAGES`
> Probably, the dependencies should also be split by subpackages, when this is
> the case. `make -V *_DEPENDS.subpkgname` provides the dependencies
>
> I can wri
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 1:19 PM Gleb Popov wrote:
>
> Ahoy there fellow porters!
>
> portmgr@ is currently working on switching the directory into which
> man pages are installed from "${PREFIX}/man" to "${PREFIX}/share/man".
> It is quite a tedious process, as you might imagine.
> ...
It's been
Hello.
It seems that subpackaging of alsa-plugins (audio/alsa-plugins) has been
reverted.
What is the post-processing when such switching takes place?
Might need pkg delete -f -g alsa-plugins-\* because it causes file conflicts?
poudriere leaves a subpackage in the package repository. Will these
10 matches
Mail list logo
