Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-03-03 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 12:25:30PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > ... > One of the reasons for the name libc.so.6 was also present, including the > following > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260434 > Or, if linux emulator is used, it also contains *.6 of lib.c. > Ah: Thank

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 09:11: > I am. however, also concerned about recently-installed packages that > appear to have references to obsolete libraries, such as libc.so.6. (I > had written earlier that I had not had libc.so.6 on my systems since 18 > February. That is technically true

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread robert
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 18:11, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:03:53AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: >> Hello. >> >> David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 03:33: >> > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libtasn1.so.6: version LIBTASN1_0_3 required >> > by /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.3

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

2024-03-03 Thread Chris
On 2024-03-02 17:48, Hubert Tournier wrote: On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:26:23 UTC, Xin LI wrote: For example, one of my port gets marked as DEPRECATED because a dependency was deprecated and scheduled for removal after 1 month, without any email telling me so (the port doesn't have a lot of releases

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 08:03:53AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 03:33: > > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libtasn1.so.6: version LIBTASN1_0_3 required by > > /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.30 not defined > > I don't know what it. > If you want to have t

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. David Wolfskill wrote on 2024/03/04 03:33: > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libtasn1.so.6: version LIBTASN1_0_3 required by > /usr/local/lib/libgnutls.so.30 not defined I don't know what it. If you want to have them rebuilt only for those packages in poudriere, the command will be as follow

math/sage misc/xiphos

2024-03-03 Thread bruce
What has happened to math/sage?  The port still exists but hasn't built in well over a year.  Also misc/xiphos.

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread robert
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 13:12, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 01:01:36PM -0600, rob...@rrbrussell.com wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 12:33, David Wolfskill wrote: >> > I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite >> > well for me since Jul 2015 (throu

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 01:01:36PM -0600, rob...@rrbrussell.com wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 12:33, David Wolfskill wrote: > > I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite > > well for me since Jul 2015 (through a couple of hardware replacements, > > sure, but the approa

Re: How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread robert
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024, at 12:33, David Wolfskill wrote: > I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite > well for me since Jul 2015 (through a couple of hardware replacements, > sure, but the approach remains the same). > > Today, in trying to chase down what was causing my ce

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Hubert Tournier
Le 03/03/2024 à 17:11, Piotr Smyrak a écrit : On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 12:48:03 +0100 Hubert Tournier wrote: Le 03/03/2024 à 09:22, Nuno Teixeira a écrit : Is there plans to add it to our ports tree? Seems that we don't have PNU deps ported yet. Yes, I'll do that, but I want to finish one or two fu

How do I clear no-longer-usable packages from poudriere?

2024-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
I have a local package-builder that's (generally) been working quite well for me since Jul 2015 (through a couple of hardware replacements, sure, but the approach remains the same). Today, in trying to chase down what was causing my central "hub" machine to whine: ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libt

compiling for other architecture

2024-03-03 Thread Oliver Epper
Hi all, I am currently working on an updated port of net/pjsip. I have a personal use case building for the raspberry-pi, too. All the information that I found so far seemed outdated. Many are talking about building a cross-compiler. With clang that should not be necessary, right? Can anyone poin

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Really nice! I will wait until it gets added to tree to try it out. Cheers, Hubert Tournier escreveu (domingo, 3/03/2024 à(s) 11:48): > > Le 03/03/2024 à 09:22, Nuno Teixeira a écrit : > > Is there plans to add it to our ports tree? > Seems that we don't have PNU deps ported yet. > > Yes, I'll

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Hubert Tournier
Le 03/03/2024 à 09:22, Nuno Teixeira a écrit : Is there plans to add it to our ports tree? Seems that we don't have PNU deps ported yet. Yes, I'll do that, but I want to finish one or two functionalities first: - VuXML vulnerabilities check, that I'll roll out this afternoon - distfiles avail

Re: Port tree linter

2024-03-03 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello, Is there plans to add it to our ports tree? Seems that we don't have PNU deps ported yet. Cheers Hubert Tournier escreveu (domingo, 3/03/2024 à(s) 01:23): > > Le 02/03/2024 à 18:22, Alexander Leidinger a écrit : > > Am 2024-03-02 09:24, schrieb Hubert Tournier: > > Now that this tool is