Re: New 2024Q3 branch

On 7/5/24 05:45, Tobias C. Berner wrote: Moin moin On Friday, 5 July 2024 14:40:02 CEST Jose Quinteiro wrote: Thanks! Just to be sure, firefox-esr is being regressed from 115.12.0 to 115.9.1? Nope sorry, that was an issue in my message-generation script -- which did not use version-sort, but

Re: New 2024Q3 branch

Thanks! Just to be sure, firefox-esr is being regressed from 115.12.0 to 115.9.1? On 7/3/24 23:01, FreeBSD Ports Management Team Secretary wrote: Moin moin The 2024Q3 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2024Q3 branch. A lot of things

Re: Call for help: moving manpages to share/man

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:39:57 +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:35 PM Christian Weisgerber wrote: Well, now it blocks contributors that don't have a GitHub account from being able to request a pull. :-) How would you request a pull when using FreeBSD git repo? Linus himsel

Re: FreeBSD Port: java/eclipse

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 14:29:50 +0100, Norbert Grundmann wrote: Hello :-) I am still using eclipse as my development environment and try to figure out how to make a new port.  Actually there is a 4.24 version in the packages - it works, but... So I already (months ago) tried to understand the port

Re: Latest and quarterly best practices

On 1/12/24 13:09, Rene Ladan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:51:06AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> On 1/4/24 12:19, Jan Beich wrote: >>> >> Maybe there are some ports that should not exist in the quarterly >> branch? Looks like some of these are under such

Re: Latest and quarterly best practices

On 1/4/24 12:19, Jan Beich wrote: > henrichhart...@tuta.io writes: > >> I propose that as a rule of thumb, if a package uses Semantic >> Versioning (semver) and the changes are non-breaking, it should be >> cherry picked into quarterly. Especially if this is only a patch level >> change and not

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

On 9/27/23 01:42, Charlie Li wrote: > Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> The sudden appearance of a Rust requirement broke at least some CI >> systems: >> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/issues/5771#issuecomment-774997087 >> > And that's not py-cryptography's or

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

On 9/26/23 09:14, Guido Falsi wrote: (snip) >> >> And yet I remember a proposal that would have prevented this requirement >> on one of these lists. Separate base SSL from ports SSL. Force ports to >> use ports SSL and prune back base SSL to the bare minimum required for >> base. This would have gi

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

On 9/26/23 00:17, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 26/09/23 08:53, Helge Oldach wrote: >> Gareth de Vaux wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2023 17:06:54 +0200 (CEST): >>> Hi all, I've just upgraded bind916 which brought half my system down >>> since >>> it suddenly required a mountain of python packages and rust which n

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

On 9/25/23 13:21, George Mitchell wrote: > On 9/25/23 11:38, Guido Falsi wrote: >> [...] >> There is a more general aspect to this. In the rest of the unix world >> software is now almost universally build using CI systems and >> buildboxes, people use binary packages almost all the time in linux.

Re: Wow: Building the likes of devel/llvm16 now requires building rust first (when rust is out of date). . .

On 9/13/23 23:20, Mark Millard wrote: > Note: py39 is in use in my context. > > Building devel/llvm16 requires building > textproc/py-recommonmark@py39 > Building textproc/py-recommonmark@py39requires building > textproc/py-sphinx@py39 > Building textproc/py-sphinx@py39

Re: Building a Linuxulator userland from source

I'm one of your just a new Linux distro sceptics (on the forums, not here), and I'm encouraged by your progress and dedication. Thank you! On 9/1/23 07:55, Felix Palmen wrote: > * Felix Palmen [20230820 12:35]: >> Just a little update on this [...] > > Posting yet another status update because

Re: Building a Linuxulator userland from source

Amazing work. Thanks Felix! On 8/17/23 23:23, Felix Palmen wrote: > Hi all, > > for the last two weeks, I've been working on a spike in ports which now > reached a state where I want to show it to and discuss it with fellow > ports hackers. > > First, a link to my feature branch (warning, will

Re: Get ${OSREL} at install time

On 4/18/23 03:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 18.04.2023 16:51, Felix Palmen wrote: > >> With lua scripts, you can't even use freebsd-version because execution >> is very restricted for them in pkg. And for some features (like e.g. >> dynamically creating a pkg-message output), you need lua... > > Y

Re: ports tree bootstrap using git

Will the master branch of Git always build on Freebsd? There are some patches in the port, though they seem to mainly deal with install paths and the like. This one for configure.ac makes me wonder: # Define PERL_PATH to provide path to Perl. -GIT_ARG_SET_PATH(perl) +GIT_ARG_SET_PATH(perl, allow-

Re: On what days are the git servers available to obtain the ports tree?

On 5/4/22 05:01, Andy Farkas wrote: > > On 3/05/2022 9:07 am, Tatsuki Makino wrote: >> To clean it up without cloning, we will have to make full use of the >> following commands, which are listed here. >> >> # git stash push --all -- :/ >> # git stash pop >> # git pull --autostash --rebase --prune

Re: On what days are the git servers available to obtain the ports tree?

There's no need to CC me. I'm subscribed to the list. On 5/2/22 13:37, Chris wrote: >> Is there a reason why you can't do a git pull to accomplish this? > Thanks for the reply, Jose. > Sure. Still don't understand why you can't just do a "git pull". That will fetch and apply just the changes from

Re: On what days are the git servers available to obtain the ports tree?

On 5/2/22 12:55, Chris wrote: > On 2022-05-02 12:04, Chris wrote: >> On 2022-05-02 11:21, Janky Jay, III wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> On 5/2/22 11:09, Chris wrote: I'm a maintainer for well over 100 ports. But more often than not, I am not permitted to obtain the ports tree from any of >>

Re: What to do if e-mail from pkg-fall...@freebsd.org arrives?

On 3/23/22 08:48, Dan Mahoney wrote: > > >> On Mar 23, 2022, at 7:14 AM, Rodrigo Osorio > > wrote: >> >> On 3/23/22 14:44, Vasily Postnicov wrote: >>> Oh my! I didn't see that. I tried on x86-64 :) I don't even have >>> arm64 machine. Any ideas what to do? >>> >>> ср, 23 ма

Re: Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On 1/23/22 13:12, Helge Oldach wrote: > Stefan Esser wrote on Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:08:30 +0100 (CET): >> Am 23.01.22 um 18:12 schrieb Jose Quinteiro: >>> On 1/23/22 09:06, tech-lists wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 08:55:09AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >&g

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On 1/23/22 09:06, tech-lists wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 08:55:09AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > >> You can run HTTP on a non-standard port. For example, 8080 is commonly >> used. As an added bonus, this means that the HTTP server need not run as >> root. > >

Re: [HEADSUP] Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg

On 1/23/22 08:47, tech-lists wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 05:32:26PM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: >> >> If this is due to security considerations, I don't think a place >> disallowing ssh and https would allow plain ftp. > > Some places either might not have or might not allow egress. > Some netwo

Re: Adding functionality to a port

On 11/16/21 2:34 AM, Rob LA LAU wrote: > ...Even OpenBSD, if you want to keep it close to home, dictates > that all patches, work-arounds and dependencies must be documented, and > that all changes must be sent upstream to try and have them included in > the original work... Openbsd packages come

Re: deskutils/nextcloudclient Cannot connect securely to

On 10/25/21 7:22 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 10/25/21 09:51, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 25/10/21 08:14, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> FreeBSD 12-STABLE from Oct 15 >>> nextcloudclient 3.3.5 >>> >>> I get popup messages from the client stating "Untrusted Certificate >>> Cannot connect securely

Re: Strange things when trying to build math/arb

Port probably needs a revbump: https://github.com/fredrik-johansson/arb/commit/d271652d3124c9e65a97df310a141c607a0b5ee5 Thanks, Jose On 10/23/21 9:19 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I get the weirdest errors when I try to build the port math/arb, which > was recently updated to version 2.21

Re: Hello. I need to play with Amstrad CPC emulator, Caprice32, so, add it to the ports.

Does libretro-cap32 not work for you for some reason? https://www.freshports.org/games/libretro-cap32 Thanks, Jose On 10/1/21 11:20 AM, Joaquín Rufo Gutierrez wrote: > Hello. > I need to play with Amstrad CPC emulator, Caprice32, so, add it to the > ports. > > Please. >

xf86-video-ati upgrade removes libgbm.so

Several users on the forums report missing libgbm.so after a package upgrade. Forum user Vull tracked this down to upgrading xf86-video-ati. It appears the package installs libglvnd, which partially conflicts with mesa-libs. The latter is removed, but should probably be re-installed as libglvnd do

Re: Restraining poudriere

On 6/12/21 4:16 PM, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:26:16PM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >> On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>> Trying it now, hoping to see parallel core use. >> >> You won't. Setting PARALLEL_JOBS=1 means e

Re: Restraining poudriere

On 6/12/21 10:57 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 07:36:48PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >> >>> On 12. Jun 2021, at 19:31, bob prohaska wrote: >>> >>> ???In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to >>> work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1

Re: Restraining poudriere

On 6/12/21 10:29 AM, bob prohaska wrote: > In playing with poudriere on raspberry pi 3 and 4 it seems to > work well on the 8 GB Pi4 but is over-optimistic on the 1 GB Pi3. > (snip) You might want to consider modifying your USE_TMPFS setting in poudriere.conf if you are constrained by memory. The