few hours ago. I don't track
quarterly, so I don't know its status there.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
much for hte work on the new beefy systems.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
ely stable. This is my main concern
as I don't use any of the three ports. I do see that the average number of
packages that are behind the port seems to be steadily rising, on a system
with only 310 packages installed, from 5-6 to 12-25 and is increasing.
I have not looked at statistics for othe
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:57 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:06 PM Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The recent mate-panel update to 1.28.0 causes the
>> notification-area-applet, clock-applet and window-switch-applet to
>> crash. i
let is part of mate-panel, not mate-applets.
> pkg info mate-panel\*
mate-panel-1.28.0,1
> pkg info mate-appl\*
mate-applets-1.26.0_5
> pkg which /usr/local/libexec/wnck-applet
/usr/local/libexec/wnck-applet was installed by package mate-panel-1.28.0,1
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herd
Looks like dns/libidn has the same issue with lld 17+ as libidn2. At least
it exhibits the same error as libidn2.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
;s are probably pretty old from cutover-to-git days.
>
That is the documented URL for ports in the Handbook. Looks like your cert
information may be out of date. I pull daily from
https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
and it works fine. That is strongly evidenced by "CAfile: non e".
--
K
"current" is t a flavor but a different port. I've never seen this until
today.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
ependencies are reinstalled when
'-R' is added to '-f', but just '-f' triggers a reinstall of a port and all
of its dependency tree.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
e new file will be used from the next run.
>
> Regards.
>
I think portmaster has a bug. As per the man page, the behavior of '-f'
matches the behavior of '-R -f". Actually, I'm unclear on what the purpose
'-f' is. If you run portmaster with no options on
erl, I asked what the
"rules" were for structuring a port. Never got an answer. At least we now
have portlint that eliminates a lot of these issues.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 1:09 AM Charlie Li wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > As I expected, each package install takes a very long time. It appears
> > that the average time to install a package with 1.20.2 was running about
> > 45-50 seconds. Hopefully this latest updat
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:15 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2023, at 21:05, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:10 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> > On Jul 11, 2023, at 12:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:42 PM Mark
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 1:10 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2023, at 12:57, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:42 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> > On Jul 10, 2023, at 21:27, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand it, the ports-mgmt/pk
. It's a re-install every time. (I may not understand how poudriere
does things, but I am pretty sure that caching is done.)
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
d:
> >>>> Konstantin Belousov wrote on
> >>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 01:18:05 UTC :
> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:52:50PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >>>>>> Something looks really messed up on the beefy16 package buil
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 7:14 PM Tatsuki Makino
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote on 2023/07/10 09:52:
> > only completed 459 packages, a rate of 10 packages/hour and, if it
> > continues at this rate, will not complete for about 40 days. Nt sure if
>
> T
.
Build report is at
http://beefy16.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=131amd64-default&build=e81dafc952d7
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
issue in something in the system or, possibly, a
change in default options, assuming that the port version has not changed.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
pat.x/linux
>
> thanks,
> danny
>
What command are you using? Normally pkg should not be writing to root
unless one of the files it does write to is on the same file system.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober..
s been completed does not mean that the packages
built on htat run are available. The time to distribute varies with the
size of the run and network performance. It has greatly improved during hte
past year as mirrors in some places are getting higher speed connections.
I should also note that pkg-status data only updates the display on a
reload. Updates from the IPv6-onlybuild systems do update every 10 seconds.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
elp with the committing though, unfortunately.
>
> Hope that helps somewhat,
> Martin
>
Putting the website in pkg-descr is obsolete. The website should be in a
"WWW= statement after MAINTAINER and COMMENT statements in hte
Makefile.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022, 18:13 Dan Mahoney wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2022, at 09:27, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 2:58 AM Dan Mahoney wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> A quick question:
>>
>> If a pkg depends on python, but not a speci
lled, and later
> install 3.9 -- is there any easy way to point your package at the new
> version as the new dependency, without deinstalling/reinstalling it?
>
> -Dan
>
It will use the version specified as default in /usr/ports/Mk/
bsd.default-versions.mk.
--
Kevin Ober
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:33 AM Baptiste Daroussin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:36:52AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I had a crash while building ffmpeg on a new system. The build had not
> > begun, so I don't think ffmpeg is really an issue. portmaster(8)
rsion; in file
pkgdb.c:2357: database disk image is malformed
Is there any way to rebuild the DB or, if not, how do I remove it and start
from scratch?
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Finger
d by "pkg version -vl '<'".
>
> With out fail, one (or more) problem crops up, and I report
> it. I then find a fix for the problem and move on. To
> the next broken port issue.
>
I would suggest checking with "pkg version -vL=". It will also flag
o
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 9:22 PM Graham Perrin
wrote:
> <https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/log/UPDATING>
>
> On 28/11/2021 02:52, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > … like /usr/ports/UPDATING had been abandoned. The last update was over
> > a year ago. …
>
> Either Kevin
gt; python38-3.8.12_1 =
>
Seems like /usr/ports/UPDATING had been abandoned. The last update was over
a year ago. This SHOULD have been in UPDATING.
If I remember correctly, the fix is to de-install both py38-packaging and
py38-setuptools.
> pkg delete -f py38-setuptools
> pkg delete -f py38-packaging
> portmaster devel/pkg-packaging
> portmaster devel/py-setuptools
This assumes the use of portmaster, but it should work with whichever tool
you use.
The problem was that a function was moved between ports and, as a result,
you can't build either port when the old version of either is installed.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
they were a thing of the past.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Enginee
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Sorry. "An update was committed." Don't know how I made that typo.
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:59 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On
See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257264 No update was
committed a couple of hours ago. IT will build, but may not work properly.
Testing is in progress.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:33 AM @lbutlr wrote:
>
>
> > On 02 Jul 2021, at 00:03, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 4:00 PM @lbutlr wrote:
> >
> >> On 01 Jul 2021, at 16:45, The Doctor wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at
is a volunteer job.
(They all are except the few paid by the FreeBSD Project.)
If someone could update the port, any ports committer can update the port
after a 14 day wait. Until that timeout, it's in Larry's ballpark. I
suspect that some of the FreeBSD patches will need at least a lit
Search" box.)
Many thanks, Jan! Maybe, if I get bored, I'll write a pkg-status "chest
sheet" or something similar and see about putting it on the wiki. No
promises, though! I seem to get round tuits pretty infrequently.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 7:58 PM Jan Beich wrote:
> Kevin Oberman writes:
>
> > When ports were in svn, the revision caused a listing of package builds
> to
> > be listed in order by default, but now git hashes are used and the order
> > seems effectively random. T
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:05 PM Mark Millard wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote on
> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:49:47 -0700 :
>
> > When ports were in svn, the revision caused a listing of package builds
> to
> > be listed in order by default, but now git hashes are used
recent ports builds? Seeing
elapsed time would also be handy!
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
with one. It's a really huge amount of data and the places that havd
mirrors on slow links are the ones that rally need to load packages form a
fairly local mirror.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Finger
ckages is a LOT of bytes
and, for many locations with slow, error prone connections it simply takes
days to move the data. To quote a fictional character of my youth,
"Patience, Grasshopper."
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkober...@gmai
40 matches
Mail list logo
