Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

Le sam. 16 mars 24 à 9:28:23 +0100, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> écrivait : > If you are asking to remove ports without maintainer, you are asking to > remove 3458 ports right now, and many others depends on these unmaintained > ports, so the impact will be much bigger. Seconded! Ports w

Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy

Le mer. 28 févr. 24 à 20:22:34 +0100, Florian Smeets écrivait : > Dear ports community, Hello, > as the removal of ports is a recurring source of friction and dispute we > would like to add a ports removal and deprecation policy to the porters > handbook. Thanks for working on this subject!

Re: math/sage misc/xiphos

Le mer. 6 mars 24 à 8:34:44 +0100, Hiroo Ono écrivait : > On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 12:05:30 -1000 > bruce wrote: > > > What has happened to math/sage?  The port still exists but hasn't > > built in well over a year.  Also misc/xiphos. > > The ports' Makefile says: BROKEN= hoping to fix it

Re: Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken

Le dim. 18 févr. 24 à 12:30:55 +0100, Aryeh Friedman écrivait : > > It is still possible for maintainer to submit PR with patches not tested > > on poudriere: it is the committer’s responsibility to perform these > > tests before committing them. > > Again when will mere mortals get to do anyth

Re: Re: FreeBSD ports community is broken

Le dim. 18 févr. 24 à 12:18:11 +0100, Aryeh Friedman écrivait : > Wonderful: Are we now moving to the binary pkg only for mere mortals > then. For example my desktop is a fairly standard 12 core machine > with 24 GB of RAM and plenty of disk space (on SSD's) but yet Proudrie > slows the machine

Re: a list of the ABI which get built?

Le dim. 19 nov. 23 à 21:59:16 +0100, Dan Langille écrivait : > Is there a list of the ABI which get built? > > For example, the last time FreeBSD:12:aarch64 was updated is: Oct 11 2018 - > clearly not active. > > It would be helpful to me to have a list the ABI which the build farm > active

Re: Does anyone has patch for math/py-scikit-umfpack ?

Le lun. 16 oct. 23 à 12:26:07 +0200, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko écrivait : > Hi, list Hello, > I'm building audio/audacity package, but failed at > math/py-scikit-umfpack: I just submitted PR 274518 with a patch from GH: With this patch it bui

Re: dns/bind916 builds rust unexpectedly

Le mar. 26 sept. 23 à 9:44:51 +0200, Guido Falsi écrivait : > Actually it's much worse than that. It's not only rust per se. > > My poudriere machine rarely can do a build run without rebuilding one or > more of rust, some version of clang, some version of gcc, qt[56]-webengine, > py-qt6 (this

Re: Storage of options for ports

Le ven. 7 juil. 23 à 21:23:04 +0200, Xavier Humbert écrivait : > Hi, Hello, > For backup purposes, I need to know where is stored port options (make > config) Under /var/db/ports/ . -- Th. Thomas. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: security/portsentry removal

Le dim. 9 avr. 23 à 2:33:01 +0200, Mel Pilgrim écrivait : > But completeness, peace of mind, etc. > > FWIW, you can still build and use portsentry either extratree or copy > the port to your local category. It is even possible to resurrect this port, take its maintainership and host a copy

Re: Staging and /var

Le mar. 27 déc. 22 à 22:29:02 +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder écrivait : > ## Stephen Roznowski (sjrb...@verizon.net): > > > I'm in the process of creating a new port that requires the installation > > of some files in /var. There already exist many examples: check $ find /usr/ports/games -nam

Re: Poudriere: Dependency loop detected

Le jeu. 10 nov. 22 à 13:09:24 +0100, David Wolfskill écrivait : > FWIW, I am also seeing this (as I fired up poudriere to build the > newly-updated www/chromium, rather than trying to subject a laptop to > that). Fixed by Antoine in 005fd6c6bef3. -- Th. Thomas. signature.asc Description: PGP

Poudriere: Dependency loop detected

Hello, Trying to run poudriere (bulk or testport) fails with this error: [00:00:05] Error: Dependency loop detected: These packages depend on each other: libgd-2.3.3_3,1 libavif-0.11.1 aom-3.5.0 libjxl-0.7.0 openexr-3.1.5 py39-breathe-4.34.0 doxygen-1.9.5,2 graphviz-2.50.0_14 These packages dep

Re: armv7 targeting via poudriere-devel: devel/R-cran-rJava failed for lack of linker finding the library for -ljvm

Le dim. 5 juin 22 à 22:57:16 +0200, Mark Millard écrivait : > Note: This was using an armv7 poudriere jail on a aarch64 machine able to > run armv7 code. > > work/rJava/config.log reports: > > configure:3852: checking whether JNI programs can be compiled > configure:3865: cc -o conftest -O2 -

Re: git: f1ef83b857f5 - main - math/octave: switch to Qhull8

0c7a6182ca02002b63cfe80f9 > > Author: Thierry Thomas > > AuthorDate: 2022-02-18 18:36:53 + > > Commit: Thierry Thomas > > CommitDate: 2022-02-18 18:44:54 + > > > > math/octave: switch to Qhull8 > > Maybe I should retire qhull, and re

Re: RFC: vim default GUI

Le lun. 2 août 21 à 13:51:24 +0200, Adam Weinberger écrivait : > Hello, ports users, Hello, > My thought is to flavorize the port and make separate packages for > each of the GUI toolkits: -console (TUI-only), -gtk3, -gtk2, -x11, > -motif, etc. I would like to make -console the default, meani

Re: Proposal: Include the Application Name in Ports and Packages

Le ven. 23 juil. 21 à 23:36:28 +0200, probono écrivait : > Looking at https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/main/Mk/bsd.port.mk > I don't see anything related to CPE, so I am not sure what to do > there. CPE is explained here: . -- Th. Thomas. sign

Re: Port from Linux, Makefile not in top-level

Le ven. 18 juin 21 à 18:19:45 +0200, Xavier Humbert écrivait : > In fact, ${WRKSRC_SUBDIR}/Makefile takes care of the first-level > "rudder-agent", and files are correctly installed in the "stage" directory, > but a huge problem arises : > "make makepatch" and "make patch" ignore this first-leve

Re: Maintainer timeout: graphics/ImageMagick7 bug 256215

Le ven. 18 juin 21 à 15:03:29 +0200, Toshimichi Maubuchi écrivait : > Hello FreeBSD Ports, Hello, > I believe we have exceeded the two week maintainer timeout on bug 256215. > There is a patch that allows you to optionally specify a dependency on FFMPEG. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/

Re: New port: math/polymake -- some questions and help needed

Le lun. 14 juin 21 à 21:41:02 +0200, Philipp Ost écrivait : > Hi ports@ Hello, > I've been working on a port of polymake (polymake.org). Most of the work > is done, but there are some questions. Please advise: Remark: this is a resurrection $ grep polymake /usr/ports/MOVED math/polymake||20

Re: Forcing options in required ports

Le jeu. 3 juin 21 à 19:34:28 +0200, Xavier Humbert écrivait : > Hi, Hello, > I need to add a BUILD_DEPENDS to a port (p5-FusionInventory-Agent, > actually) with specifics options required by the port which requires it > > This lead to 12 questions : > > 1- Is there a way to specify options