Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2023/10/23 08:03: > Now assume two imaginary flags. > One flag is to forcefully update, and the other is to use a mechanism to > allow a restart in case of failure. > If -f is used there, all of them will be flagged to be forced to update and > to be restartable in case of

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Kevin Oberman wrote on 2023/10/22 13:12: > I think portmaster has a bug. As per the man page, the behavior of '-f' > matches the behavior of '-R -f". Actually, I'm unclear on what the purpose > '-f' is. If you run portmaster with no options on a port that is up to > date, it still reinstalls it an

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-22 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Helge Oldach wrote on 2023/10/22 13:42: > The point I was trying to make is that p5-* is not even comprehensive, > as some ports don't have a name starting with p5-. The thing is that > such ports' files may need to be moved from site_perl/mach/5.34 > to site_perl/mach/5.36 still. Likewise to clean

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-21 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 5:10 PM Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Helge Oldach wrote on 2023/10/21 14:49: > > portupgrade -f `pkg query %ro-%rv lang/perl5.28` > > In the case of portmaster, it is portmaster -r perl5- . > Reinstalling everything listed in `pkg info -q -r perl5` like this is > overkill. > Pe

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-21 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Helge Oldach wrote on 2023/10/21 14:49: > portupgrade -f `pkg query %ro-%rv lang/perl5.28` In the case of portmaster, it is portmaster -r perl5- . Reinstalling everything listed in `pkg info -q -r perl5` like this is overkill. Perhaps that is why the method that used to be "portmaster -r perl5-"

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-21 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 12:41:23 +0200 (CEST) free...@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) wrote: > Tomoaki AOKI wrote on Sat, 21 Oct 2023 09:23:15 +0200 (CEST): > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 07:49:51 +0200 (CEST) > > free...@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) wrote: > > > > > Tatsuki Makino wrote on Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:39:27

Re: lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-21 Thread Tomoaki AOKI
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 07:49:51 +0200 (CEST) free...@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) wrote: > Tatsuki Makino wrote on Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:39:27 +0200 (CEST): > > The default version of perl has been switched, have you been able to keep > > up? :) > > Updating according to the procedure written in UPDATING

lang/perl5.36: update procedure written in UPDATING is not enough

2023-10-20 Thread Tatsuki Makino
Hello. The default version of perl has been switched, have you been able to keep up? :) Updating according to the procedure written in UPDATING is sufficient to avoid the trouble of not finding the library when perl is executed. However, it has not moved the files installed according to the old v