* J Moore [2006-08-01]:
> While attempting 'make install' on a 3.9 stable box, errors were
> encountered.
>
> Where'd I go wrong?
You didn't read the error message.
> ===> Building package for unrar-3.54p0
> ===> Installing unrar-3.54p0 from
> /usr/ports/packages/i386/all/unrar-3.54p0.tgz
I'm going to commit this tomorrow if no one objects.
Bernd
Bernd Ahlers [Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:57:43PM +0200] wrote:
>Bernd Ahlers [Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 11:19:19AM +0200] wrote:
>>Attached is an update to mutt-1.5.12. The current sidebar patch doesn't
>>apply correctly, so the sidebar FLAVOR
Attached is an update to Exim 4.63, which fixes some bugs and adds
some new features. See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.exim.announce/104> for Philip
Hazel's release announcement. Tested on i386.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file
All you patches applied fine and I was able to "make update" in all packages,
except on esound.
When doing an install or update I get the following error:
===> Building package for esound-0.2.36
Switching to /usr/ports/audio/esound/pkg/PFRAG.shared
Error in package:
"/usr/ports/audio/esound/w-e
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:29:21AM +0200, the unit calling itself Nikolay Sturm
wrote:
> > While attempting 'make install' on a 3.9 stable box, errors were
> > encountered.
> >
> > Where'd I go wrong?
>
> You didn't read the error message.
>
> > ===> Building package for unrar-3.54p0
> > ==
* J Moore [2006-08-01]:
> > > Can't install unrar-3.54p0 because of conflicts (unrar-3.43)
> >
> > This is clear, no?
>
> No, I'm afraid it's not... I tried un-installing unrar-3.43, but got a
> warning to the effect that this would also require removal of clamav.
>
> I tried using the new "upd
Hi,
Oggfwd is a very simple source client for Icecast servers that reads an
Ogg stream (with arbitary content) from stdin and forwards it to the
server. Documentation and some improvements by yours truly; it's now
ready to be packaged. Tested on i386.
Also, I have included my other submissi
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:45:26PM +0200, the unit calling itself Nikolay Sturm
wrote:
> > > > Can't install unrar-3.54p0 because of conflicts (unrar-3.43)
> > >
> > > This is clear, no?
> >
> > No, I'm afraid it's not... I tried un-installing unrar-3.43, but got a
> > warning to the effect that
ANNOUNCING - NOW AVAILABLE
[IMAGE]
210 pages
(80,000 words)
Paperback
ISBN 99932-82-05-7
E-Book PDF
ISBN 99932-82-06-5
Published in: United Kingdom, United States, Netherlands, Canada,
Mexico, Spain, Australia, Singa
* J Moore [2006-08-01]:
> This worked well for the most part - the exceptions being unrar &
> unarj; a couple of archivers required by clamav. The pkg_add update
> said it couldn't upgrade those packages. As I understand it, pkg_add
> doesn't work with these apps due to some political/licensing iss
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:37:41AM -0500, J Moore wrote:
> I tried the new "update" feature of pkg_add following my 3.8-to-3.9
> upgrade.
>
> This worked well for the most part - the exceptions being unrar & unarj;
> a couple of archivers required by clamav. The pkg_add update said it
> couldn'
Hi,
Since this package seems to lack a maintainer, here is a patch to bring
this port up to date.
The one thing that the patch doesn't do is to get rid of the patch in
the patch directory that is no longer needed.
Please test. It works for me.
If you are a committer and are happy with this pat
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:45:26AM -0500, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> All you patches applied fine and I was able to "make update" in all packages,
> except on esound.
> When doing an install or update I get the following error:
>
> ===> Building package for esound-0.2.36
> Switching to /usr/ports/
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 08:46:09PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 07:45:26AM -0500, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> > All you patches applied fine and I was able to "make update" in all
> > packages,
> > except on esound.
> > When doing an install or update I get the following
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> > Hm.. Sorry, but I can't reproduce this problem :/ Can you send me
> > logfile from install/update process?
>
> No need for it now :-)
> I've found the problem. The diffs that you made against /dev/null for eg:
> patch-Makefile_am
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:19:18PM -0500, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> > > Hm.. Sorry, but I can't reproduce this problem :/ Can you send me
> > > logfile from install/update process?
> >
> > No need for it now :-)
> > I've found the
* Mikolaj Kucharski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is normal `cvs diff' behaviour or I should pass some special
> parameters to `cvs diif' command to make correct diffs with new files
> within patch?
Remember you can use 'make update-patches' for that. Also, you should only
patch one source fil
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:59:04PM +0200, the unit calling itself Nikolay Sturm
wrote:
> > This worked well for the most part - the exceptions being unrar &
> > unarj; a couple of archivers required by clamav. The pkg_add update
> > said it couldn't upgrade those packages. As I understand it, pkg_
Allan Lyons [2006-08-01, 11:32:55]:
> Hi,
>
> Since this package seems to lack a maintainer, here is a patch to bring
> this port up to date.
>
> The one thing that the patch doesn't do is to get rid of the patch in
> the patch directory that is no longer needed.
>
> Please test. It works for m
19 matches
Mail list logo