Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
why it was never put in.
Jason
On 11/22/06, Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/11/21, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Here is the port for
2006/11/22, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
why it was never put in.
No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from
ports
Selon Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No idea. Nobody here provided any feedback, and there was no reaction from
ports committers. No reaction at all.
Well, for testing this one needs a WiFi supported adapter, which I don't.
Maybe I did something wrong, and there is another way to submit a
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:09:33PM +0300, Anton Karpov wrote:
2006/11/22, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry that I didn't check the archives for that, I figured a search
through all the ports currently in -current was good enough. I wonder
why it was never put in.
No idea. Nobody
We don't always have the time to look over everything that gets posted
on the mailing list. Just be persistent, eventually someone will get
to your submission.
--
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
What's happening with the tcpstat port? I tried to get in touch with the
maintainer but no reply. No
Martynas Venckus wrote:
Bugzilla Bug 357333: upgraded to NSPR 4.6.4.
approved for 1.8 branch, a=dveditz
Also, use new MULTI_PACKAGES...
http://www.altroot.org/nspr-4.6.4.diff
You might want to change WANTLIB to WANTLIB-main.
Other than that, it looks good.
--
Antoine
