On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:05:35AM +0200, viq wrote:
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/local/lib/libexpat.la' or
> unhandled argument `/usr/local/lib/libexpat.la'
you probably have a *.la file referencing libexpat.la.
to find out which one:
$ ls /usr/local/lib/lib*.la | grep libexp
I would be interested in helping with this port
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 5/19/07, Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please email the list the updated port so that people who
may be interested in helping you can reproduce the problem.
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:32:19 pm Vortechz wrote:
>
> Jacob
Please email the list the updated port so that people who
may be interested in helping you can reproduce the problem.
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:32:19 pm Vortechz wrote:
>
> Jacob probably recognizes this:
>
>
> Starting program: /usr/local/bin/wine /emul/w/windows/sol.exe
>
> Program received
If i remember correctly, wine uses $ORIGIN to load shared
objects, but maybe i am wrong.
Search for something like -Wl,-rpath,\''$$ORIGIN'\' and remove
that, like we did for OpenOffice.
Jacob probably recognizes this:
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/wine /emul/w/windows/sol.exe
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to process 31915, thread 0x8891a000]
0x06a4dbec in _dl_malloc () from /usr/libexec/ld.so
(gdb) bt
#0 0x06a4dbec in _dl_malloc () from /u
Giovanni Bechis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:28:11PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > The latest bulk build on i386 turned up these broken ports:
> >
> [...]
> > net/pidgin ?
> >
> It works for me on i386 (updated yesterday), what's wrong?
Is there any reason why this update for EasyTag isn't commited? :/
Here is it:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=117873761907843&w=2
Greetings.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:28:11PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> The latest bulk build on i386 turned up these broken ports:
>
[...]
> net/pidgin ?
>
It works for me on i386 (updated yesterday), what's wrong?
Giovanni
Hi,
On 18/05/07, Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the fundamental question is if the *BSD-world is interested in
the future of their TeX-port(s).
When I woke up this morning I took a look at the tpm's in more depth
and proceeded to write some perl with XML::Parser to traverse
