Would you ever porting bsnmpd ( http://people.freebsd.org/~harti/bsnmp/ )
and it's modules ( bsnmp-regex , bsnmp-ping ) for OpenBSD stable or
current release ( i386 arch ) ?
Bsnmpd with bsnmp-ping module is so wonderful pingator ...
excellent-working, so light ... ! The only reason that _only
little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish
(installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a
little patch to fix it.
- benoƮt
--
http://friendpaste.com
mercurial.diff
Description: Binary data
Poptop updated to latest stable version, maintainership change
discussed some times ago
(http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-portsm=116648382708437w=2)
Tested @i386
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/poptop/Makefile,v
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish
(installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a
little patch to fix it.
I like the intent of this patch, but I've considered and decided
against
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:19:50AM +0200, Bojidara Marinchovska wrote:
Would you ever porting bsnmpd ( http://people.freebsd.org/~harti/bsnmp/ )
and it's modules ( bsnmp-regex , bsnmp-ping ) for OpenBSD stable or current
release ( i386 arch ) ?
Bsnmpd with bsnmp-ping module is so wonderful
On Dec 27, 2007 5:19 PM, Will Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
little bug in current mercurial package. hgk extension use wish
(installed with tk) but wish8.4 is installed on openbsd. Here is a
little patch to fix it.
I like
On Dec 17, 2007 9:17 PM, Will Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tweaked the port a bit and made it available here:
http://www.lfod.us/files/ports/py-openid.tgz
In addition to tabbing fixes, I rewrote pkg/DESCR to be less verbose
and added www/twill to REGRESS_DEPENDS. Without twill
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 10:24:14PM +0100, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
quick update for version 2.1.1. Did you have any news from twill
maintener ?
Yes; the copyright headers on the .py files are wrong -- MIT is the
intended license. Titus plans to release a new version without the
confusing license