Re: SECURITY UPDATE: lighttpd

2008-02-29 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 29 February 2008 11:09:31 Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote: > > > > sorry, but is there something wrong with this patch? I don't see how > > all these extra lines should be there. This is 1.4.18, with only 1 > > patch in ports, '

[NEW] net/wide-dhcpv6

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Sperling
Attached is a port of wide-dhcpv6. I've tested both the client and the server, on i386. Some example configuration files come with the distribution. For more, see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=34685&group_id=153668 -- stefan http://stsp.name

Re: SECURITY UPDATE: lighttpd

2008-02-29 Thread Brad
On Friday 29 February 2008 11:09:31 Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > here's the vendors patch to fix CVE-2008-0983 > > http://secunia.com/cve_reference/CVE-2008-0983/ > > > > ok to commit? > > > >

Re: SECURITY UPDATE: lighttpd

2008-02-29 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > here's the vendors patch to fix CVE-2008-0983 > http://secunia.com/cve_reference/CVE-2008-0983/ > > ok to commit? > sorry, but is there something wrong with this patch? I don't see how all these ext

Re: SECURITY UPDATE: lighttpd

2008-02-29 Thread Antti Harri
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: hi, here's the vendors patch to fix CVE-2008-0983 http://secunia.com/cve_reference/CVE-2008-0983/ ok to commit? If so old version is going to be shipped with release, then could the patch I sent to the Brad be included also? The patch was

SECURITY UPDATE: lighttpd

2008-02-29 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
hi, here's the vendors patch to fix CVE-2008-0983 http://secunia.com/cve_reference/CVE-2008-0983/ ok to commit? cheers, jasper -- "The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge." -- Bertrand Russel Index: Makefile =

Re: ion on amd64

2008-02-29 Thread Andrew Ruscica
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:34:47PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Any particular reason ion doesn't exist on amd64? ? I just installed it from ports: ===> Installing ion-20070318p1 from /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/ ion-20070318p1: complete I'm running the Feb 26/27 snapshot & ports. I'm act

breakage on amd64

2008-02-29 Thread Marco Peereboom
I got my shiny new work laptop yesterday and decided to switch my desktop to amd64. Since several packages were missing I decided to use ports. I ran into some breakage. For example: ===> mplayer-1.0rc2p2 depends on: faad-* - not found ===> Verifying install for faad-* in audio/faad ===> Chec

Re: SECURITY UPDATE: mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.12

2008-02-29 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:42:58PM +0100, Bernd Ahlers wrote: > Matthieu Herrb [Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:21:56PM +0100] wrote: > >Tried it on amd64. On startup it complains that > > > >/usr/local/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so can't be found and > >thus fonts in some dialogs (save as... f

Re: SECURITY UPDATE: mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.12

2008-02-29 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Matthieu Herrb [Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:21:56PM +0100] wrote: >Tried it on amd64. On startup it complains that > >/usr/local/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so can't be found and >thus fonts in some dialogs (save as... for instance) are missing (empty >boxes) > I don't see that here. (but I

Re: [PATCH] net/tinyfugue (resubmit)

2008-02-29 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:26:40AM +0100, Markus Lude wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:51:05AM +0100, Markus Lude wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:15:21PM +0100, Markus Lude wrote: > > > Hello, > > > on sparc64 the time displayed in the status line is always 01:00. When > > > building the p