UPDATE: productivity/gtg

2009-04-03 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
Minor release since it mainly covers bug fixes from the previous release. http://gtg.fritalk.com/post/2009/04/03/GTG-0.1.1-is-out! Please review and test. -- best regards q# Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/productivity/gtg

Re: lib/X11/fonts/ghostscript?

2009-04-03 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:37:29PM +, Christian Weisgerber said that > frantisek holop wrote: > > > > Do we still need or want the lib/X11/fonts/ghostscript symlink? > > > > as far as i know, only xpdf made good use of those fonts... > > and that can be configured in xpdf. > > _How_ do

Re: UPDATE: x264

2009-04-03 Thread Brad
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:59:27PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:13:36PM -0400, Brad wrote: > > > At least ffmpeg, x264 and mplayer build fine on macppc (after fixing > > > some conflicts and some missing pkgname bumps). Trying the other > > > stuff now. > > >

Re: UPDATE: x264

2009-04-03 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 04:13:36PM -0400, Brad wrote: > > At least ffmpeg, x264 and mplayer build fine on macppc (after fixing > > some conflicts and some missing pkgname bumps). Trying the other > > stuff now. > > There should only be one conflict with MPlayer Maybe. I had a beer or two. >

Re: UPDATE: x264

2009-04-03 Thread Brad
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:56:05PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:25:15AM -0400, Brad wrote: > > > > http://comstyle.com/x264/ > > > > > > Re-posting with a slightly newer snapshot being used for the x264 update. > > > > Could someone with a macppc system please check

textproc/xpdf: fix hardcoded /usr/local

2009-04-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
xpdf hardcodes a path under /usr/local and several that don't exist on OpenBSD. Use ${LOCALBASE} and remove the others. ok? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/xpdf/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.6

Re: lib/X11/fonts/ghostscript?

2009-04-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > as far as i know, only xpdf made good use of those fonts... > > and that can be configured in xpdf. > > _How_ does xpdf access those fonts? Directly, by probing the displayFontDirs in xpdf/GlobalParams.cc. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: Extending libfprint

2009-04-03 Thread Tobias Weingartner
On Thursday, April 2, Benjamin D Adams wrote: > > I have a Lenovo T60 with a fingerprint option installed. I will help > with the test if worked on. If any of you guys can track down the programming documentation, that would be a good start to having this type of device supported... --Toby.

UPDATE: multimedia/mkvtoolnix

2009-04-03 Thread Benoit Lecocq
Hi, This is a diff for the latest version of mkvtoolnix 2.6.0. Tested on amd64. Cheers, -- Benoit Lecocq Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/multimedia/mkvtoolnix/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -r1.14 Makefile ---

Re: problem with evolution mail client on gnome

2009-04-03 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Juan Ramon Venegas Moreno wrote: > Greetings, > > Hi to all, this is what I get when I run evolution from a comand shell > > $ evolution > (evolution:10948): e-utils-WARNING **: can't load plugin > '/usr/local/lib/evolution/2.24/plugins/liborg-gnome-prefer-plain.so': Cannot >

Re: problem with evolution mail client on gnome

2009-04-03 Thread Juan Ramon Venegas Moreno
Greetings, Hi to all, this is what I get when I run evolution from a comand shell $ evolution (evolution:10948): e-utils-WARNING **: can't load plugin '/usr/local/lib/evolution/2.24/plugins/liborg-gnome-prefer-plain.so': Cannot load specified object RSS Plugin enabled (evolution 2.24, evolution-r

Re: lib/X11/fonts/ghostscript?

2009-04-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
patrick keshishian wrote: > >> > Do we still need or want the lib/X11/fonts/ghostscript symlink? > >> > This connection causes X11 fontconfig to pick up the Ghostscript > >> > fonts, which interact in weird ways with the X11 fonts. > >> > >> "interact in weird ways"? how so? > > > > Well, for one

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 15:43, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > I'd like "make plist" not to add /usr/local/share/applications > > > > > to its generated PLISTs. > > > > > > > > Okay. I t

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > I'd like "make plist" not to add /usr/local/share/applications > > > > to its generated PLISTs. > > > > > > Okay. I thin I'm following. What's wrong with > > > > > > @sample

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > I'd like "make plist" not to add /usr/local/share/applications > > > to its generated PLISTs. > > > > Okay. I thin I'm following. What's wrong with > > > > @sample ${PREFIX}/share/applications > > > > in devel/desktop-fi

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 14:07, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2009/04/03 13:24, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > share/applications is @sample'd by desktop-file-utils.

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 01:42:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/04/03 13:24, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > share/applications is @sample'd by desktop-file-utils. I wonder whether > > > it would either make sense to c

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 13:24, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > share/applications is @sample'd by desktop-file-utils. I wonder whether > > it would either make sense to change desktop-file-utils to install rather > > than @sample (I guess to do

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > share/applications is @sample'd by desktop-file-utils. I wonder whether > it would either make sense to change desktop-file-utils to install rather > than @sample (I guess to do that without conflicts, we'd need to either > sweep t

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 11:49, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/04/03 10:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > (offlist, replying back on-list with permission mainly to discuss the > desktop-file-utils thing below) > > > Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> Here's a diff updating the nmap port to 4.85BETA6, which comes wit

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 10:03, Giovanni Bechis wrote: (offlist, replying back on-list with permission mainly to discuss the desktop-file-utils thing below) > Stuart Henderson wrote: >> Here's a diff updating the nmap port to 4.85BETA6, which comes with >> a conficker scanner. updated diff below. > [...] >

Re: [NEW]net/py-impacket

2009-04-03 Thread Pawlowski Marcin Piotr
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:12:10 +0100 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009/04/03 03:51, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: > > Hi, > > Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing > > access to network packets. It allows Python developers to craft and > > decode network packets in simple a

Re: [NEW]net/py-impacket

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009/04/03 03:51, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote: > Hi, > Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing access > to network packets. It allows Python developers to craft and decode > network packets in simple and consistent manner. It includes support > for low-level protocols su

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2009-04-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
Here's a diff updating the nmap port to 4.85BETA6, which comes with a conficker scanner. We probably don't want to update to a beta version in-tree, but some people might need it and it makes sense to post it rather than have others duplicate the work. Index: Makefile