On 2009/07/27 14:16, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> | On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:40:22AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> | | Here's a quick port of WIDE's ifmcstat (as found in NetBSD). Comments
> | | and/or suggestions and/or OK's ?
> |
> | [
Hi,
few things I would like to mention about man pages.
0) I've wrote simple script that will cleanup man pages (attached)
1) it might be used in Makefile in post-install section
2) in that case patch would look like attached (ncat)
3) nmap, zenmap and ncat manpages need cleaning (ndiff don't)
Ple
Giovanni Bechis a écrit :
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
Hi,
few things I would like to mention about man pages.
0) I've wrote simple script that will cleanup man pages (attached)
1) it might be used in Makefile in post-install section
2) in that case patch would look like attached (ncat)
3) nmap
On 2009/07/27 19:19, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >I would be much happier to split tkmib off to a subpackage and making
> >that depend on p5-SNMP and Tk. I don't think it makes sense to have
> >an optional UI tool force the whole SNMP daemon to depend on X.
> I thought about
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:39:16 +0200
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
> > Hi,
> > few things I would like to mention about man pages.
> > 0) I've wrote simple script that will cleanup man pages (attached)
> > 1) it might be used in Makefile in post-install section
> > 2) in th
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
Hi,
few things I would like to mention about man pages.
0) I've wrote simple script that will cleanup man pages (attached)
1) it might be used in Makefile in post-install section
2) in that case patch would look like attached (ncat)
3) nmap, zenmap and ncat manpages
Stuart Henderson wrote:
I would be much happier to split tkmib off to a subpackage and making
that depend on p5-SNMP and Tk. I don't think it makes sense to have
an optional UI tool force the whole SNMP daemon to depend on X.
I thought about moving tkmib to net/net-snmp,-perl and add x11/tk as
On 2009/07/27 18:52, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >
> >>Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >>>Update to 2.6.4 and port splitted into 2 packages:
> >>>-main:the main server
> >>>-utils:some utilities needed to monitor and collect sta
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > I don't see the benefit for splitting this package. Did I miss something?
> >
> This way amavisd-new (the server part) does not depend on net/net-snmp,-perl
> (which will depend on x11/tk soon (tkmib needs x11/tk to run, I am discussing
> this with r
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Update to 2.6.4 and port splitted into 2 packages:
-main:the main server
-utils:some utilities needed to monitor and collect statistics
Ok ? Comments ?
New diff with correct pkgpath (fixed by
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Update to 2.6.4 and port splitted into 2 packages:
> > -main:the main server
> > -utils:some utilities needed to monitor and collect statistics
> > Ok ? Comments ?
> >
> New diff with correct pkgpath (fixed by willi
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Update to 2.6.4 and port splitted into 2 packages:
-main:the main server
-utils:some utilities needed to monitor and collect statistics
Ok ? Comments ?
New diff with correct pkgpath (fixed by william@).
Ok ?
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
=
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Update to 2.6.4 and port splitted into 2 packages:
-main:the main server
-utils:some utilities needed to monitor and collect statistics
New diff with correct pkgpath (fixed by william@).
Ok ?
Cheers
Giovanni
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:40:22AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| | Here's a quick port of WIDE's ifmcstat (as found in NetBSD). Comments
| | and/or suggestions and/or OK's ?
|
| [we...@doom] $ cat pkg/DESCR
| ifmcstat is a small tool
The bug was reported 2 months ago[1], I think this patch is ok.
[1]http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/detail?id=464
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/07/24 23:55, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>> >
On 2009/07/24 23:55, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > The portable way would be to enlarge the buffer and retry whenever
> > you get ERANGE. I ran into this problem several weeks ago for GHC
> > (and a diff doing the try/enlarge/retry-gam
16 matches
Mail list logo
