Hi,
Following my diff last week, this diff updates openbox to the latest
release 3.4.11.1, a bugfix release.
Tested on amd64.
Comments ? OK ?
Cheers,
benoit
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/openbox/Makefile,v
retrieving
Here is an update to Xine-ui 0.99.6.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/multimedia/xine-ui/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.13 Makefile
--- Makefile22 Dec 2009 15:46:59 - 1.13
+++ Makefile9 Ap
>From :
> [silence]
That bad?
I would grateful for any pointers,
-- Sebastian
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:40:46 +0200
> From: Matthias Kilian
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Looks like there are some files that are both in the openoffice
> > package and the open-i18n-nl package.
> >
> > # pkg_add openoffice-i18n-nl
> > Collision: th
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Grumpy wrote:
> > > So, now, any enterprising soul can just open the sqlports database with
> > > their favorite sqlitebrowser, peer through the BROKEN table, and have a
> > > try
> > > at fixing the issues.
> >
> > So you basically fucked our last excuse for holidays...
>
> > So, now, any enterprising soul can just open the sqlports database with
> > their favorite sqlitebrowser, peer through the BROKEN table, and have a try
> > at fixing the issues.
>
> So you basically fucked our last excuse for holidays...
> THANK YOU MARC, THANK YOU!
Aren't you supposed to b
On 04/17/10 08:25, Chris Bennett wrote:
I also stated earlier that message filters were not working and that
subfolders were not correct.
The following is not a full set of new profile I would create. I gave
up at this point.
On the second email address, should have LWP as subfolder, nothing el
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
> there's been some discussion about it. The idea is to move some information
> from dynamic handling to static visibility.
>
> Namely, a pattern such as
> .if ${ARCH} == "sparc64"
> BROKEN = "doesn't work on sparc64, we don't know why"
> .endif
> has low vi
there's been some discussion about it. The idea is to move some information
from dynamic handling to static visibility.
Namely, a pattern such as
.if ${ARCH} == "sparc64"
BROKEN = "doesn't work on sparc64, we don't know why"
.endif
has low visibility. Anyone who works on the ports tree outside of
I also stated earlier that message filters were not working and that
subfolders were not correct.
The following is not a full set of new profile I would create. I gave up
at this point.
On the second email address, should have LWP as subfolder, nothing else.
Yet after a restart, I got INBOX^LWP
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 02:01:43PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Looks like there are some files that are both in the openoffice
> package and the open-i18n-nl package.
>
> # pkg_add openoffice-i18n-nl
> Collision: the following files already exist
>
> /usr/local/openoffice.org/basis3.2/
On 04/17/10 07:17, Chris Bennett wrote:
On 04/16/10 21:18, RD Thrush wrote:
On 04/16/10 18:07, ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
I built a debug version of thunderbird 3 for i386.
I have not been able to get it to run in gdb as Larry suggested.
[...]
If you really want someone to help, you
Looks like there are some files that are both in the openoffice
package and the open-i18n-nl package.
# pkg_add openoffice-i18n-nl
Collision: the following files already exist
/usr/local/openoffice.org/basis3.2/share/template/wizard/letter/nl/bus-elegant_l.ott
(openoffice-3.2.0p0)
On 04/16/10 21:18, RD Thrush wrote:
On 04/16/10 18:07, ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
I built a debug version of thunderbird 3 for i386.
I have not been able to get it to run in gdb as Larry suggested.
[...]
If you really want someone to help, you'll have to build a debug
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> I think zaurus people and whatnot still prefers xmms.
Yup, xmms is not going anywhere.
--
Antoine
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:03:55PM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
> Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
> > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > >
> > > apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> > > that us
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0100
Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:32:17 +0100
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> >
> > apart from the big hurdle called 'xmms' there are only a few ports left
> > that use it.
> >
> I guess I'm one of the few people that actually use XMMS but I sup
17 matches
Mail list logo
