Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Thursday 19 August 2010 08:55:21 pm Jolan Luff wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 09:32:14PM +0300, Antti Harri wrote: > > On Thursday 19 August 2010 20:55:50 Jolan Luff wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > > Haven't tried yet to run this version

devede/mplayer ogg-issue fixed

2010-08-19 Thread Neal Hogan
I just want to point out that the recent update to mplayer (mplayer-20100308p3) appears to have fixed the ogg-issue that was happening with devede. Thanks! montagueneal uname -a OpenBSD montague 4.8 GENERIC.MP#4 amd64 -Neal

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/08/19 15:46, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Also I am not sure whether the SHARED_ONLY is superfluous since its only for > i386 anyways. it's not superfluous.

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Jolan Luff
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 09:32:14PM +0300, Antti Harri wrote: > On Thursday 19 August 2010 20:55:50 Jolan Luff wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > > Haven't tried yet to run this version, but I think you should probably > > > use INSTALL_PROGRAM in th

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Antti Harri
On Thursday 19 August 2010 20:55:50 Jolan Luff wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Haven't tried yet to run this version, but I think you should probably > > use INSTALL_PROGRAM in the do-install step. > > I purposely changed it from INSTALL_PROGRAM so

update: net/zabbix to 1.8.3

2010-08-19 Thread Florian Gross
Hello, here is a diff for updating net/zabbix to the latest version 1.8.3. After startup the server log showed a lot of errors Expression [...] cannot be evaluated: Evaluation failed for function: [...] which has also been reported in the forum http://zabbix.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18819

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Jolan Luff
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Haven't tried yet to run this version, but I think you should probably use > INSTALL_PROGRAM in the do-install step. I purposely changed it from INSTALL_PROGRAM so the debugging symbols don't get stripped. I'll change it back

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Thursday 19 August 2010 12:34:24 pm Jolan Luff wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:09:12PM -0700, Jolan Luff wrote: > > Here's a new version of the port. > > > > - sound now works (tested w/azalia) > > - now installs w/debugging symbols > > - pkgname fixed (1.31->1.41) > > Another revision. Cra

Re: [patch] textproc/docbook port fix by removing examples.zip

2010-08-19 Thread Jiri B.
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:38 +0200 > From: billi...@gmail.com > To: ports@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: [patch] textproc/docbook port fix by removing examples.zip > > On 08/13/10 17:42, Thomas de Grivel wrote: >> On 08/13/10 15:10, Thomas de Grivel wrote: >>> Docbook port is broken by not findin

Re: [patch] textproc/docbook port fix by removing examples.zip

2010-08-19 Thread Thomas de Grivel
On 08/13/10 17:42, Thomas de Grivel wrote: On 08/13/10 15:10, Thomas de Grivel wrote: Docbook port is broken by not finding a distfile. This patch removes the examples.zip file from the docbook port, which is missing from upstream. Just removing it from DISTFILES fixed building. It does not se

Re: uae

2010-08-19 Thread Marco Peereboom
Neat! Anyone porting that yet? On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 07:47:27PM +1000, armpit wrote: > On 08/19/2010 01:12 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Is there a version of uae that has an ethernet device on it? > > > > btw, there is a newer version out then in our tree ;-) > > > > PUAE offers A2065 ethe

Re: uae

2010-08-19 Thread armpit
On 08/19/2010 01:12 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Is there a version of uae that has an ethernet device on it? > > btw, there is a newer version out then in our tree ;-) > PUAE offers A2065 ethernet emulation, although I haven't tried it. One of the main reasons I keep a windows box besides for g

Re: spectrum (WAS: Re: WIP: spectrum and needed dependencies testers wanted)

2010-08-19 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Thursday 19 August 2010 10:26:48 am viq wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:04:20AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > >viq wrote: > > >>On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 07:51:54PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > >>>viq wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 31,

Re: return to castle wolfenstein port

2010-08-19 Thread Jolan Luff
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:09:12PM -0700, Jolan Luff wrote: > Here's a new version of the port. > > - sound now works (tested w/azalia) > - now installs w/debugging symbols > - pkgname fixed (1.31->1.41) Another revision. Crashing on dying appears to be fixed. I'll probably make it respect CC/C

drupal5: anyone still using it

2010-08-19 Thread Marc Espie
Neither Stephan nor I use drupal5 anymore, which means we don't really test stuff all that much. Does anyone still run it ? It's likely OpenBSD 4.8 will be the last release with actual support. Moving to drupal6, unless you have really specific local development, is possible (a bit painful for vie

Re: NEW: logic2cnf

2010-08-19 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:18:28AM +0200, Matthias Guedemann wrote: > > Anyway here is the port. OK? > nice, works on my i386 (Atom), did a "make regress", will likely do more > testing > with other examples. Good! > > Fixed a typo in the man page (was called logic2cnd) and changed it to "

Re: NEW: logic2cnf

2010-08-19 Thread Matthias Guedemann
Hi, > Anyway here is the port. OK? nice, works on my i386 (Atom), did a "make regress", will likely do more testing with other examples. Fixed a typo in the man page (was called logic2cnd) and changed it to "any _propositional_ logic formula", or does it solve predicate logic? As I assume you

Re: spectrum (WAS: Re: WIP: spectrum and needed dependencies testers wanted)

2010-08-19 Thread viq
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:04:20AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, > > > > Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > >viq wrote: > >>On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 07:51:54PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > >>>viq wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > >>