hi,
very Interesting. But, in spanish. Do you have one in english?
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Quintero <
fernando.a.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi lists,
> I uploaded 2 new documents about the port system, these are really simply,
> but I guess it could help someone.
>
> Down
Hi,
Here's an update to gbrainy 1.60.
Tested on amd64.
Comments? Okay?
Kevin
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/games/gbrainy/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile16 Nov 2010 11
On Jan 05 13:52:22, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> very Interesting. But, in spanish. Do you have one in english?
Yes: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Fernando Quintero <
> fernando.a.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi lists,
> > I uploaded 2 new documen
Hello,
At Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:14:33 +0900,
TAKAHASHI Kaoru wrote:
> At Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:10:20 +0900,
> TAKAHASHI Kaoru wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch updates japanese/nkf to the latest release 2.1.0.
> > Tested on OpenBSD 4.7.
> >
> > Could you update japanse/nkf to 2.1.0?
> >
> > Re
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:06:29PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Wed 2010.12.29 at 16:57 +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:00:34PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > > Hi Mikolaj,
> > >
> > > I've made some additional changes:
> > > - got rid of groff requirement for
Hello, ports@ readers.
Man pages looks fine with -current mandoc (synced one minute ago) so i
do not use USE_GROFF clause. Package provides several scripts that do
not have #!/usr/bin/perl as their first line, user have to understand
that they should be invoked like `perl /usr/local/bin/nameque
On 01/05/11 14:47, Igor Zinovik wrote:
> Hello, ports@ readers.
>
> Man pages looks fine with -current mandoc (synced one minute ago) so i
> do not use USE_GROFF clause. Package provides several scripts that do
> not have #!/usr/bin/perl as their first line, user have to understand
> that they
On Jan 05, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > Man pages looks fine with -current mandoc (synced one minute ago) so i
> > do not use USE_GROFF clause. Package provides several scripts that do
> > not have #!/usr/bin/perl as their first line, user have to understand
> > that they should be invoked like `pe
Hi all,
The attached diff updates vitunes to its latest release (2.0).
I've also included two patches from upstream git:
- Remove old hack for stop'ing playback
- Fix numerous formatting errors in the manpage
Also, USE_GROFF is no longer necessary...
Comments? OKs?
Cheers,
David
Index: Makefil
Great, I will have a look at it as soon as I arrive in Guatemala.
Thanks
Chris Bennett
On Tue, January 4, 2011 09:35, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, frantisek holop wrote:
>
>> no worries, lots of ports are behind with their rc script,
>> it's a bit of a fast moving target.'s
So I have the question. What's wrong with apcupsd.rd?
>
> Actually, not at all, I made sure
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:20:01PM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote:
> [...]
> Couple of questions:
> 1) We are seeing a few new fonts ports. Should we have a "fonts"
> category? Otherwise, is print or x11 a better category for fonts?
> [...]
I think this is a good idea and would like to move the fonts to
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
wrote:
> I think this is a good idea and would like to move the fonts to a fonts/
> subdirectory after 4.9. Any opinions?
fwiw, I'm all in favor of doing so.
ciao,
david
Even newer and improved-er!
On 12/11/10 06:25, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> New and improved!
>
> On 11/18/10 22:47, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> I install this in libdata/ instead of lib/ because lib/
>> tends to be crowded and it doesn't matter where this is installed.
>> Nothing uses it or links to it
*ping*
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Hi I tried sending this diff to maintainer but got the following "over
> quota" error back:
>
> - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
>
> (reason: 552 5.2.2 Over quota)
>
> also, noticed in cvs logs t
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:16:56PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
> wrote:
> > I think this is a good idea and would like to move the fonts to a fonts/
> > subdirectory after 4.9. Any opinions?
>
> fwiw, I'm all in favor of doing so.
+1
--
hmm, on Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:10:36PM +0100, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse said
that
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:20:01PM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > Couple of questions:
> > 1) We are seeing a few new fonts ports. Should we have a "fonts"
> > category? Otherwise, is print or x11 a better
got some more goodies.
* add icons
* add local certificate management
* add certificate viewer
* add ca viewer
* restore tab history when undoing delete tab
* add window size to config file
* add save global history
* add restart of browser while maintaining state
* fix nasty use after free bug
*
18 matches
Mail list logo
