On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:57:55AM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On 06/02/11 6:05 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:41:22PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> >>On 05/02/11 6:30 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >>>
> >>>/var/db/pkg> cat nss-3.12.8/+REQUIRING
> >>>nspr-4.8.6
> >>>sqlite3-3.7.4
> >>>.libs-sqlit
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 06:05:38PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> Hi ports@,
> audio/xmms2 is broken atm, segfaulting when starting xmms2d with libao
> as output plugin, using sndio. I?ve eliminated libao as the cause
> (mpg321 works), so this is probably a bug in xmms2, in
> src/plugins/ao/ao.c. I?
Hi ports@,
audio/xmms2 is broken atm, segfaulting when starting xmms2d with libao
as output plugin, using sndio. I’ve eliminated libao as the cause
(mpg321 works), so this is probably a bug in xmms2, in
src/plugins/ao/ao.c. I’d appreciate if someone with more insight into
libao could take a look. T
On 06/02/11 6:05 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:41:22PM -0500, Brad wrote:
On 05/02/11 6:30 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
/var/db/pkg> cat nss-3.12.8/+REQUIRING
nspr-4.8.6
sqlite3-3.7.4
.libs-sqlite3-3.6.23p0
This looks weird to me. Is that supposed to happen, or is something
wr
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:18:15PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Federico G. Schwindt
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:12:43AM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Federico G. Schwindt
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jan
Hi!
According to cpp(1), cpp should accept the following syntax:
cpp
[...]
infile outfile
but cpp uses BOTH as infile ?!?
$ echo foo >foo
$ echo bar >bar
$ cpp -P foo bar
foo
bar
$
this just annoyed me when I tried to port something.
Of course I could word around it by doi
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:41:22PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On 05/02/11 6:30 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> >/var/db/pkg> cat nss-3.12.8/+REQUIRING
> >nspr-4.8.6
> >sqlite3-3.7.4
> >.libs-sqlite3-3.6.23p0
> >
> >This looks weird to me. Is that supposed to happen, or is something
> >wrong?
>
> I've see
I've been hammering on the i386 package pretty hard over the last couple
of days. It's proven surprisingly stable on my single user test machines:
AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3300+ ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class,
128KB L2 cache) 2.01 GHz, avail mem = 1572626432 (1499MB)
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1
