On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Brad wrote:
> On 06/11/11 4:40 PM, David Coppa wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Brad wrote:
>>
>>> I much prefer Qt apps but what exactly is the objection with Gtk+3 over
>>> 2?
>>
>> It's just that I don't want to install gtk3 only for using my
>> fav
> Yeah, it's their problem. But gv has gotten so bad at dealing with
> PDFs for me that I've just about stopped using it entirely. In ports
> is xpdf and zathura, and epdfview...
>
> --STeve Andre'
>
MuPDF in ports is also good, minimal and snappy.
On Sun, 06 Nov 2011 20:44:00 -0500
STeve Andre' wrote:
> [...]
> Yeah, it's their problem. But gv has gotten so bad at dealing with
> PDFs for me that I've just about stopped using it entirely. In ports
> is xpdf and zathura, and epdfview...
>
> --STeve Andre'
Thanks, I'll check those out.
On 11/06/11 19:37, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
Printed web pages to PDF from within xxxterm. gs 9.02 from Nov 4
packages installed; gv 3.7.1 from Nov 4 packages installed.
Tried to open in gv, error shown below:
Error: /rangecheckGPL Ghostscript 9.02: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
in --.discar
Printed web pages to PDF from within xxxterm. gs 9.02 from Nov 4
packages installed; gv 3.7.1 from Nov 4 packages installed.
Tried to open in gv, error shown below:
Error: /rangecheckGPL Ghostscript 9.02: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
in --.discardtransparencygroup--
Operand stack:
--dict:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:46:03AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I want to clarify one thing, that is not mentioned in Porting FAQ but
> make me (and looks like not only me) curious: post-patch vs.
> pre-configure.
>
> As far as I can understand, "patch" targets are intended to oper
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The attached diff brings NAnt up to version 0.91 which was just
>>> released. Was tested on i386 u
Hello all.
I want to clarify one thing, that is not mentioned in Porting FAQ but
make me (and looks like not only me) curious: post-patch vs.
pre-configure.
As far as I can understand, "patch" targets are intended to operate on
WRKSRC and "configure" - on WRKBUILD, unless source package is broken
ping
On 06/11/11 4:40 PM, David Coppa wrote:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Brad wrote:
I much prefer Qt apps but what exactly is the objection with Gtk+3 over 2?
It's just that I don't want to install gtk3 only for using my
favourite bittorrent client...
You don't use any other Gtk+ apps?
--
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Brad wrote:
> I much prefer Qt apps but what exactly is the objection with Gtk+3 over 2?
It's just that I don't want to install gtk3 only for using my
favourite bittorrent client...
An update to Ming 0.4.4.
Tested via my amd64 Gnash buildbot typically many times a day.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/multimedia/ming/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefile
Madame, Monsieur,
Dans cette période difficile, il est important de soutenir votre
activité commerciale.
Pour développer l'activité de votre société, vous devez mettre en avant
vos produits, vos services, trouver de nouveaux clients.
En un mot : Vous faire connaître.
La publicité par Email est
> > and the core uses bindings to brainfuck.
On Oct 23 18:44:32, Zantgo wrote:
> impossible, as so advanced will be made in language so basic
not basic. visual basic.
- Original message -
> 2011/11/7 David Coppa :
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Christian Weisgerber
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The GTK+ client now uses GTK+3.
> >
> > n!!!
>
> ... Learn to use the Qt Side of the Force...
I much prefer Qt apps but what exactly is the
2011/11/7 David Coppa :
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Christian Weisgerber
> wrote:
>
>> The GTK+ client now uses GTK+3.
>
> n!!!
... Learn to use the Qt Side of the Force...
--
WBR,
Vadim Zhukov
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> The GTK+ client now uses GTK+3.
n!!!
This updates net/transmission to 2.42.
The GTK+ client now uses GTK+3.
I've only lightly tested the daemon client. The GTK+ and Qt clients
start up, beyond that I don't know.
Stefan Unterweger wasn't quite happy about 2.41:
> transmission-cli now doesn't write the download into the directory fr
lots of small commits recently, break-down of what changed:
- the handling of arch-dependent IGNOREd packages is much better.
There should be very few spurious path breakage on architectures where
everything does not build.
- errors are reported much more consistently as paths logfiles.
- FETCH_MA
On 06/11/11 9:14 AM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:49:47PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Here is n update to znc-0.202.
Portswise, this looks ok to me, but I'm not using it, so it would
be nice if anyone using it could give it a quick test.
I'm the MAINTAINER and I had setup zn
On 06/11/11 11:36 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Brad wrote:
You have some .orig files in your patches dir. Update the diff
so that stuff is not included.
I think those got put by 'cvs add patches/*' which I did earlier as
this port didn't have any patches
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Brad wrote:
> You have some .orig files in your patches dir. Update the diff
> so that stuff is not included.
I think those got put by 'cvs add patches/*' which I did earlier as
this port didn't have any patches directory.
If I remove those files I get:
#
An update to Warzone 2100 2.3.9.
Tested on amd64.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/games/warzone2100/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 Makefile
--- Makefile7 Jul 2011 21:16:44 - 1.16
++
On 06/11/11 10:13 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:05:33PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Rodolfo Gouveia wrote on Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:23:41PM +:
If USE_GROFF=Yes I get these errors with 'make package':
===> Building package for bonnie++-1.96
Create /usr/ports/packag
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:05:33PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Rodolfo Gouveia wrote on Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:23:41PM +:
> > If USE_GROFF=Yes I get these errors with 'make package':
> > ===> Building package for bonnie++-1.96
> > Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/bonnie++-1.96.tgz
> > W
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:49:47PM -0400, Brad wrote:
> Here is n update to znc-0.202.
Portswise, this looks ok to me, but I'm not using it, so it would
be nice if anyone using it could give it a quick test.
Ciao,
Kili
> Index: Makefile
>
Hi,
Here is an update of www/py-webhelpers to 1.3.
Tested and regress both OK on Loongson.
Comments? OK?
wen
Index: py-webhelpers/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/py-webhelpers/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff
Hi,
Here is an update of textproc/py-MarkupSafe to 0.15.
Tested and regress both OK on Loongson.
Comments? OK?
wen
cvs server: Diffing py-MarkupSafe
Index: py-MarkupSafe/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/py-Ma
Hi Rodolfo,
Rodolfo Gouveia wrote on Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 12:23:41PM +:
> If USE_GROFF=Yes I get these errors with 'make package':
> ===> Building package for bonnie++-1.96
> Create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/bonnie++-1.96.tgz
> Weird subject line in .../cat1/bon_csv2html.0:
Those are ma
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 05:00:25PM -0300, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
> Hi, me again, we have another version of xxxterm with this changes:
>
> * Add webkit webinspector.
> * Fix a couple of link following bugs (command box wouldn't disappear,
> enter didn't always work and some more nits).
> * Fi
* LEVAI Daniel [2011-11-06 08:56+0100]:
> Great improvements, btw; if only I could copy-paste from xxxterm to
> xterm... :)
pkg_add autocutsel
grep autocutsel ~/.xinitrc
autocutsel -fork
autocutsel -selection PRIMARY -fork
On 06/11/11 7:23 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:06:38AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Setting USE_GROFF=Yes is always ok in case of doubt,
and it would be *required* if there were ERRORs with
mandoc(1) -Tlint.
But i don't see any ERRORs with mandoc here,
and not counting a
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 02:06:38AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Setting USE_GROFF=Yes is always ok in case of doubt,
> and it would be *required* if there were ERRORs with
> mandoc(1) -Tlint.
>
> But i don't see any ERRORs with mandoc here,
> and not counting a few whitespace differences,
> groff
CLIPPINGs
To remove: l...@talktalk.net
Sent to:
Take 21 Minutes
The last few weeks has seen short clips from blue chip companies with their
perception of the future.
The digital signage community is rapidly being enclosed by technology trends
that combines it into an all encompasing mash. I
The following diff replaces the audio FLAVOR with a Voice/Video FLAVOR.
I have received a handul of requests for this so I thought it's about
time I actually add an appropriate FLAVOR for it.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/p
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 17:00:25 -0300, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
> Hi, me again, we have another version of xxxterm with this changes:
Still working OK on i386.
Great improvements, btw; if only I could copy-paste from xxxterm to
xterm... :)
Daniel
--
LÉVAI Dániel
PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F
Key finger
36 matches
Mail list logo
