On 9 September 2013 22:17, Janne Johansson wrote:
> I used the following changes to the BSDmakefile to make leonardo happy:
> prompt> diff -u ../../blink/BSDmakefile BSDmakefile
> --- ../../blink/BSDmakefile Sat Mar 16 16:48:29 2013
> +++ BSDmakefile Thu Jan 10 19:31:35 2013
> @@ -42,24 +42,24
Hello ports@,
can anybody confirm that the port works on (at least) i386?
(Reattaching for convenience.)
Also, is there anything else I need to do about the licensing?
Teyjus developers committed the patches upstream so that they won't be needed
on their next release, but this will probably take
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:05:18PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:11:08PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:17:33PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> >
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:11:08PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:17:33PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Landry Breuil wro
I used the following changes to the BSDmakefile to make leonardo happy:
prompt> diff -u ../../blink/BSDmakefile BSDmakefile
--- ../../blink/BSDmakefile Sat Mar 16 16:48:29 2013
+++ BSDmakefile Thu Jan 10 19:31:35 2013
@@ -42,24 +42,24 @@
#AVRDUDE_PROGRAMMER = stk500
## or for newer boards li
On 2013/09/09 13:04, Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 9/9/2013 12:51 PM, Azwaw OUSADOU wrote:
> >Hi !
> >
> >I ported terminology, the terminal emulator supported by e17.
> >
> >Tested with an amd64
> >
> >Please test it !
> >Thanks
> >
>
> Really quick untested eyeball:
> * You only need PERMIT_PACKAGE
Hi !
I ported terminology, the terminal emulator supported by e17.
Tested with an amd64
Please test it !
Thanks
terminology.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:03:43PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:11:26AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrot
On 9/9/2013 12:51 PM, Azwaw OUSADOU wrote:
Hi !
I ported terminology, the terminal emulator supported by e17.
Tested with an amd64
Please test it !
Thanks
Really quick untested eyeball:
* You only need PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=Yes
* Missing PLIST goo
* That DESCR is huge. You definitely don't n
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:24:53PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:03:43PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:11:26AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote:
> > > I have been testing this on amd64 after time_t switch. It works
> > > well. I t
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:03:43PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:11:26AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote:
> > I have been testing this on amd64 after time_t switch. It works
> > well. I tested even some date functions in racket/date.
> >
> > Is it ready to be
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:11:26AM +0300, Lars Engblom wrote:
> I have been testing this on amd64 after time_t switch. It works
> well. I tested even some date functions in racket/date.
>
> Is it ready to be included in ports?
Racket has been ready for months but summer isn't the best season in t
I have been testing this on amd64 after time_t switch. It works well. I
tested even some date functions in racket/date.
Is it ready to be included in ports?
On 08/11/13 01:25, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
Bugfix release of racket. Tests and comments are welcome as usual.
Cheers.
13 matches
Mail list logo
