Re: UPDATE net/iftop to 1.0pre3

2014-02-08 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
No reply from maintainer. Other okays? http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=138966895717715&w=2 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:08:46AM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > Hi, > > Simple update, seems to work for me. Looking at > > - mandoc -Tlint -Werror seems happy, drop groff dependency > -

Re: mail/p5-Email-Received test depends

2014-02-08 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2014-02-09 2:04 GMT+04:00 Alexander Bluhm : > Hi, > > The regression tests for p5-Email-Received depend on p5-Email-Simple. > Is it correct that revision bump is not necessary as the package > does not change? Yes. > ok? Okay. > bluhm > > Index: mail/p5-Email-Received/Makefile > ===

mail/p5-Email-Received test depends

2014-02-08 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, The regression tests for p5-Email-Received depend on p5-Email-Simple. Is it correct that revision bump is not necessary as the package does not change? ok? bluhm Index: mail/p5-Email-Received/Makefile === RCS file: /data/mirror

UPDATE: isc-dhcp 4.3.0

2014-02-08 Thread Brad Smith
Here is an update to isc-dhcp 4.3.0. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/isc-dhcp/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.33 Makefile --- Makefile23 Oct 2013 13:44:11 - 1.33 +++ Makefile

KDE4 pre-release polishing

2014-02-08 Thread Vadim Zhukov
So the KDE4 workspace should be usable now. Still missing some features like Solid support (that's the reason for "no power management plugins found" message you could see at logging in). There could be dragons in migration path, too. But generally speaking KDE4 works well. If you see any problems

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 07:12:01PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > On 02/08/2014 06:53 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > >incorrect as in? which value is used? > It uses the homedir of the user that executed the script before switching to > _spampd, it seems. > > I have just tried it again: > Feb

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
On 02/08/2014 06:53 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: incorrect as in? which value is used? It uses the homedir of the user that executed the script before switching to _spampd, it seems. I have just tried it again: Feb 8 19:08:36 ira spampd[17040]: config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessib

Re: [new] mpv 0.3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 01:05:40AM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, frantisek holop wrote: > > it is me again, with a new release of mpv. > > Were the recent mplayer changes pushed upstream? Do they need to be > pushed to mpv as well? > http://www.openbsd.org/cg

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks! > > The patch is required to correctly determine the homedir. I cannot exactly > tell you why, anymore, but without it the homedir will be incorrect and incorrect as in? which value is used? > statistical ba

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
Hey, Thanks! The patch is required to correctly determine the homedir. I cannot exactly tell you why, anymore, but without it the homedir will be incorrect and statistical bayes data for future spam analysis can't be saved anymore. The same patch is used on FreeBSD. Regarding the relay/list

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:03:48PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote: > Hello, > > This is my submission of the spampd port. Please bear with me as this is > my first port for OpenBSD (though I have written FreeBSD ports before). > > Feedback is very welcome. Here's a rework of your port. I am no

heads up: signed packages

2014-02-08 Thread Marc Espie
I committed a patch to make signed "the mandatory default", e.g., pkg_add will no longer install unsigne packages without asking (interactive mode) or without -Dunsigned. The build infrastructure does add -Dunsigned during building, of course (but not for FETCH_PACKAGES obviously), and the curren

Re: New port: mail/spampd

2014-02-08 Thread Henrik Friedrichsen
Just bumping this one more time in hope for feedback. It's a very simple port which I'm currently using to filter spam (very effectively, I might say) with OpenSMTPD. Me and other people would love to see this added, as it is much much lighter and needs less dependencies compared to amavisd-ne

[UPDATE] python 2.7 && 3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Remi Pointel
Hi, there is a buffer overflow in socket.recvfrom_into (more details at http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/284 and http://bugs.python.org/issue20246). Attached are the diff. Could be good to have this in for 5.5. Ok? Cheers, Remi. Index: Makefile ===

Re: UPDATE: net/openfire

2014-02-08 Thread Marc Peters
On 02/08/14 15:46, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Marc Peters wrote: >> Hi, >> >> here is a patch for updating net/openfire to the latest release 3.9.1. >> Hopefully not to late to make it in release. > > Probably too late. > > Does it fix any security issue ? > T

Re: UPDATE: net/openfire

2014-02-08 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:33:18PM +0100, Marc Peters wrote: > Hi, > > here is a patch for updating net/openfire to the latest release 3.9.1. > Hopefully not to late to make it in release. Probably too late. Does it fix any security issue ?

UPDATE: net/openfire

2014-02-08 Thread Marc Peters
Hi, here is a patch for updating net/openfire to the latest release 3.9.1. Hopefully not to late to make it in release. Patch is attached to avoid linewrapping. Comments, Oks? Marc Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/openf

Re: [update] py-sphinx

2014-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/02/08 08:00, frantisek holop wrote: > but of course, i like to have tests (and pass them). > > having said that: > - i am not going to install texmf > > - i dont mind keeping the dependency there, > but someone else will have to raise the issue > if latex tests are failing. what do the t

Re: [new] mpv 0.3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 01:05:40AM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, frantisek holop wrote: > > it is me again, with a new release of mpv. > > Were the recent mplayer changes pushed upstream? Yes, they were commited > Do they need to be pushed to mpv as well?

Re: [new] mpv 0.3.3

2014-02-08 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, frantisek holop wrote: > it is me again, with a new release of mpv. Were the recent mplayer changes pushed upstream? Do they need to be pushed to mpv as well? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/x11/mplayer/patches/patch-libao2_ao_sndio_c -- Anthony J. B