On Sep 30, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Nigel Taylor
mailto:njtay...@asterisk.demon.co.uk>> wrote:
On 09/30/14 15:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
OK to remove this from ports? It went closed-source in 2005 and I don't
see much benefit in keeping a 9-year-old vulnerability scanner in ports.
If anyone is upset b
Hi. I've been using finch from ports (net/pidgin subpkg) for a
few months. Today I restarted it and it core dumps. The maintainer
suggested I email ports list for help.
I installed from 5.5 amd64 package. Nothing has changed lately.
A Pidgin developer told me building against OpenSSL instead of
NS
Hi,
here's an update to bogofilter 1.2.4 - the version we have in-tree is
nearly 7 years old, and even if the motto "if it ain't broken dont fix
it" is strong among some, there's been at least two CVEs since then:
http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/security/bogofilter-SA-2010-01
http://bogofilter.s
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:06 PM, vtamara wrote:
> First thank you for your work with ruby on OpenBSD, I'm doing some
> projects on RoR with it.
>
> I have not tested much rubinius --just I see that some of my projects
> compile with rbx on travis-ci.
>
> However I notice:
> * Recent rbx supports
First thank you for your work with ruby on OpenBSD, I'm doing some
projects on RoR with it.
I have not tested much rubinius --just I see that some of my projects
compile with rbx on travis-ci.
However I notice:
* Recent rbx supports mri 2.1
(http://rubini.us/doc/en/guides/migrating-from-mri
Hi,
opengroupware needs some compatibility patches from upstream to
cope with newer versions of www/sope. While touching it, a few minor
bug fixes and enhancements included.
OK?
SebastianIndex: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/
Hi,
long overdue an update. The update to 2.2.6 was too short to make it into the
release for 5.6. Meanwhile we're at 2.2.9.
Attached patches update to that newer version, I have running since a few
days without issues so far.
With the change of 2.2.8 -> 2.2.9, the documentation is not provided
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Am 30.09.2014 um 15:39 schrieb Christian Weisgerber :
> > Joel Sing:
> ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
> ===> www/apache-httpd
> >>
> >> Is this the only ports fallout?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> So what about patching these two apache ports instead of LibreS
On 09/30/14 15:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK to remove this from ports? It went closed-source in 2005 and I don't
> see much benefit in keeping a 9-year-old vulnerability scanner in ports.
>
> If anyone is upset by this, feel free to submit an OpenVAS port instead :)
>
>
OpenVAS is in OpenBSD
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK to remove this from ports? It went closed-source in 2005 and I don't
> see much benefit in keeping a 9-year-old vulnerability scanner in ports.
>
> If anyone is upset by this, feel free to submit an OpenVAS port instead :)
>
nuke it
-
On 2014/09/30 15:47, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK to remove this from ports? It went closed-source in 2005 and I don't
> see much benefit in keeping a 9-year-old vulnerability scanner in ports.
>
> If anyone is upset by this, feel free to submit an OpenVAS port instead :)
>
...as a bonus this ge
OK to remove this from ports? It went closed-source in 2005 and I don't
see much benefit in keeping a 9-year-old vulnerability scanner in ports.
If anyone is upset by this, feel free to submit an OpenVAS port instead :)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:00:48AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> - src/native/linux/opengl/extgl_glx.c dlopen should just use
> dlopen("libGL.so", ...) rather than forcing a specific version,
> otherwise this needs manual changes every time the version is
> bumped in X
Could have sworn I added
Am 30.09.2014 um 15:39 schrieb Christian Weisgerber :
> Joel Sing:
>
===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
===> www/apache-httpd
>>
>> Is this the only ports fallout?
>
> Yes.
>
So what about patching these two apache ports instead of LibreSSL?
It is a valid addition to the library and Li
Joel Sing:
> > > ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
> > > ===> www/apache-httpd
>
> Is this the only ports fallout?
Yes.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:23:24AM -0400, trondd wrote:
> Just an update (and apologies for previous top posting and message history)
> but we've only ever seen this error and crash while running xmlto. I would
> think (maybe wrongly) that a stack-protector issue would show up in other
> programs,
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/09/30 11:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2014/09/29 14:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > Apache doesn't like the addition of SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain().
> > >
> > > ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
> > >
> > > ../../modules/ssl/ssl_uti
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/09/29 14:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Apache doesn't like the addition of SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain().
> >
> > ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
> >
> > ../../modules/ssl/ssl_util_ssl.h:119: error: conflicting types for
> > 'SSL_CTX_use_
On 2014/09/30 11:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014/09/29 14:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > Apache doesn't like the addition of SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain().
> >
> > ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
> >
> > ../../modules/ssl/ssl_util_ssl.h:119: error: conflicting types for
> > 'SSL_CTX_u
On 2014/09/29 14:06, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Apache doesn't like the addition of SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain().
>
> ===> www/apache-httpd-openbsd
>
> ../../modules/ssl/ssl_util_ssl.h:119: error: conflicting types for
> 'SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain'
> /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:1533: er
- src/native/linux/opengl/extgl_glx.c dlopen should just use
dlopen("libGL.so", ...) rather than forcing a specific version,
otherwise this needs manual changes every time the version is
bumped in X
- ARCH is an internal variable and shouldn't be overridden, it
should be OK to just use another nam
21 matches
Mail list logo
