Landry Breuil said:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:42:34AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson said:
> > > On 2016/02/03 00:25, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > > > Stuart Henderson said:
> > > > > On 2016/02/02 21:58, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > > > Oh, and the code in src/int/file
I'm trying to get this into the ports tree yet again.
MOC is a console audio player with simple ncurses interface. It
supports OGG, WAV, MP3 and other formats. Just run mocp, go to some
directory using the menu and press enter to start playing the file.
The program will automatically play the re
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:42:55AM +0300, Andre S wrote:
> p7zip-15.09p3
>
> Core dumped when used "l" command to list contents of password protected
> archive.
>
> Core dumped when used "t" command to test integrity of password protected
> archive.
>
> $ 7z a -p test.7z test.txt
> Success.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:43:41AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> In testing on amd64, I do get different results. The list command
> does not prompt for a password.
Same here. This is very odd behavior. I would not expect a "password
protected" archive to reveal information about its content.
I'
Hi,
rpm core dumps when "installing" a rpm[1]:
rpm-3.0.6p7
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #1862: Thu Jan 21 18:48:14 MST 2016
Steps to reproduce:
* mkdir -p /tmp/rpm/var/lib/rpm
* rpm -ivv --ignoreos --ignorearch --nodeps --dbpath /var/lib/rpm --root
/tmp/rpm /tmp/ovirt-release36.rp
On Wed, 03 Feb 2016, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> On 02/02/16 23:12, mi...@dataswamp.org wrote:
> >On 09:53, David Coppa wrote:
> >>If you send me what you have atm, I'll have a look...
> >Sure, thanks. Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado suggested to remove any
> >pledge() patches for now so I did t
On 2016-02-03 07:13, Theo Buehler wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:43:41AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
In testing on amd64, I do get different results. The list command
does not prompt for a password.
Same here. This is very odd behavior. I would not expect a "password
protected" archive to
Hi,
new ovirt-engine-cli port in attachment, it's CLI for oVirt
Engine (or Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager).
I'm using it daily and I can maintain ovirt-engine-cli
and py-ovirt-engine-sdk.
j.
ovirt-engine-cli.tar.gz
Description: application/tar-gz
py-kitchen.tar.gz
Description: app
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:13:20PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> Sorry for disappearing.
>
> Thanks for pointing out the VCS popen. Below is a draft that
> incorporates your suggestions. Let me know if it's too fine-grained. My
> thought was that it's ideal to drop exec as early as possible.
>
On 02/03/16 14:43, Josh Grosse wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:42:55AM +0300, Andre S wrote:
p7zip-15.09p3
Core dumped when used "l" command to list contents of password protected
archive.
Core dumped when used "t" command to test integrity of password protected
archive.
$ 7z a -p test.7z t
Theo Buehler said:
> I'm not sure if a maintainer ok is enough for me to commit it, so I
> leave it at an
According to my findings, p7zip uses getpass(3), which reads directly
from tty, so "tty" promise makes sense in contexts where password is
needed.
OK czarkoff@
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Firefox 44 appears to have snuck in a change in font handling:
Bitmap fonts are no longer used. At least that's what I see with
only the default fonts installed (xenocara defaults plus ghostscript
since that gets pulled in as a dependency).
This has two effects I noticed:
(1) For Latin script w
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:37:13AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > is it possible to get rid of proc exec? I didn't add them on my end...
>
> there are shell escapes, so they are probably needed. I don't really
> use lynx myself, but it seems to me that it's worth investigating
> tighter pledge
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:56:48PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Firefox 44 appears to have snuck in a change in font handling:
>
> Bitmap fonts are no longer used. At least that's what I see with
> only the default fonts installed (xenocara defaults plus ghostscript
> since that gets pull
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 06:02:55PM +0100, Florian Stinglmayr wrote:
> Michael's patch is very nice and should definitely make it in.
>
> Yet after speaking with upstream the other day it was made very clear to
> me that upstream wants the patch in their repository. Since my upstream
> patch requir
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:08:53AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> The patch adds support for documents with duplicate page titles. I
> need this change to update pdf2djvu to the latest version.
>
> I've not tested any djvu viewer, just the conversion. So any test is
> welcome.
Tes
When I install a zathura plugin because I only want a viewer for that
format, pkg_add will not install also the main package. Without the
core package, the plugin is useless.
While here, change the COMMENT.
The patch is very simple. OK?
Index: core/Makefile
==
I'm getting the below error when building the GCC port on a Power Mac G5
running the most recent snapshot. It fails reliably when I retry the
build, so it doesn't seem like an Act of God(TM) caused by a kernel or
hardware bug.
The build is successful with Ada disabled.
Is this a known issue? Let
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:05:24AM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> When I install a zathura plugin because I only want a viewer for that
> format, pkg_add will not install also the main package. Without the
> core package, the plugin is useless.
>
> While here, change the COMMENT.
>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:29:05AM -0500, Michael McConville wrote:
> I'm getting the below error when building the GCC port on a Power Mac G5
> running the most recent snapshot. It fails reliably when I retry the
> build, so it doesn't seem like an Act of God(TM) caused by a kernel or
> hardware b
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:56:48PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Firefox 44 appears to have snuck in a change in font handling:
>
> Bitmap fonts are no longer used. At least that's what I see with
> only the default fonts installed (xenocara defaults plus ghostscript
> since that gets pull
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:24:57PM +0100, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:37:13AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
>
> > > > is it possible to get rid of proc exec? I didn't add them on my end...
> >
> > there are shell escapes, so they are probably needed. I don't really
> > use l
22 matches
Mail list logo
