Re: [UPDATE] security/zaproxy

2017-10-21 Thread Steven Mestdagh
Remi Pointel [2017-04-17, 07:05:51]: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update zaproxy to latest release. > > Ok? any reason why this update is not yet in the tree? maybe the following rather large files could be skipped? +share/zaproxy/plugin/jxbrowser-alpha-2.zap +share/zaproxy/plugin/jxbrowserlin

NEW: net/sacc

2017-10-21 Thread Brian Callahan
Hi ports -- The gopher protocol continues to live, despite everyone else moving on. And occasionally people write new gopher clients. Here's one of those. sacc is a simple console gopher client. It uses curses and there's really not too much else to say about it. If you're a gopher user, you

Re: Update textproc/xpdf

2017-10-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/10/21 22:41, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > Here's an update to xpdf-4.00. > > Now uses Qt instead of Motif :-( > > Tests and comments are welcome. I see some offsets in the patches, is that expected? Build fails on my workstation: xpdf/CMakeFiles/xpdf_objs.dir/GlobalParams.cc.o: In

Re: UPDATE net/mininet

2017-10-21 Thread akoshibe
Hi all, As pointed out, I'd forgotten to bump the revision and had mangled the diff. Hopefully fixed both. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mininet/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -u -r1.5 Makefile --- Makef

Re: Chromium and Netsurf core dumps

2017-10-21 Thread Cág
Stuart Henderson wrote: >> It also happens when double clicking on a link in History (Ctrl+Shift+H). > Sounds like a bug :-) Is it a Netsurf's bug? Or glib's, which file it mentions? -- caóc

Update textproc/xpdf

2017-10-21 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, Here's an update to xpdf-4.00. Now uses Qt instead of Motif :-( Tests and comments are welcome. Ciao, Kili Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/xpdf/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.89 diff -u -p -r1.89 Ma

Re: [UPDATE] emulators/virtualjaguar to 2.1.3

2017-10-21 Thread Rafael Sadowski
ok rsadowski@ Cheers, Rafael On Fri Oct 20, 2017 at 09:40:53PM +0200, Frederic Cambus wrote: > On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 11:59:13AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > first I ran into the following issue: > > > > -SHA256 (virtualjaguar-2.1.3.tar.bz2) = > > WyyPztHfVkYko33R0CCYlHcFkdaXY4c8/rcUQ

Re: [UPDATE] Tor Browser 7.0.6

2017-10-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/10/18 13:37, attila wrote: > Hi ports@, > > Attached is an update to Tor Browser 7.0.6: > >* Update Firefox to 52.4.0esr >* Update Torbutton to 1.9.7.7 > * Bug 22542: Security Settings window too small on macOS 10.12 (fixup) > * Bug 20375: Warn users after entering fulls

Re: UPDATE: print/lyx

2017-10-21 Thread Rafael Sadowski
*ping* On Sun Oct 08, 2017 at 11:54:37AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hi All, > > update lyx to 2.2.3. Tested on amd64. > > Ok? Comments? > > Best regards, > > Rafael Sadowski > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/

Re: UPDATE: databases/sqlitebrowser 3.10.1

2017-10-21 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Mon Oct 16, 2017 at 04:40:52PM +0200, Caspar Schutijser wrote: > Hi ports@, > > Below is a diff that updates databases/sqlitebrowser to 3.10.1. The > port uses Qt5 now. The changes in DESCR (remove trailing whitespace) > and in PLIST were made to please portcheck. If necessary I can send > the

Re: Chromium and Netsurf core dumps

2017-10-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/10/21 17:20, Cág wrote: > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > This is likely to have been fixed with a post-6.2 commit to the chromium > > port. I *think* you can probably still just get away with running the > > snapshot package on 6.2. > > I think it's fine. They only differ by a revision. It

Re: Chromium and Netsurf core dumps

2017-10-21 Thread Cág
Stuart Henderson wrote: > This is likely to have been fixed with a post-6.2 commit to the chromium > port. I *think* you can probably still just get away with running the > snapshot package on 6.2. I think it's fine. They only differ by a revision. It doesn't crash now, well, yet, at least. > >

Re: Chromium and Netsurf core dumps

2017-10-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/10/21 16:08, Cág wrote: > Hi, > > Previously, when Chromium was gtk+2 based, it could be started within 1-3 > attempts. Now it takes from five to ten. The message is still the same: This is likely to have been fixed with a post-6.2 commit to the chromium port. I *think* you can probably s

Chromium and Netsurf core dumps

2017-10-21 Thread Cág
Hi, Previously, when Chromium was gtk+2 based, it could be started within 1-3 attempts. Now it takes from five to ten. The message is still the same: chrome($PID) in free(): use after free 0x$HEX and --- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. thrkill () at -:3 3 -: No such file or dire