On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:49:20PM +, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two desktops that run current. After I updated the first desktop
> to the latest snapshot I can no longer access ProtonMail
> (mail.protonmail.com). When I try, I get the following results:
> - Chromium: "Aw, Snap!
On 2018/06/22 15:32, Jon Bernard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was
> merged upstream, so no longer needed.
>
> OK?
>
> --
> Jon
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/ed
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:32:56PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote:
> Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was
> merged upstream, so no longer needed.
This patch and the py-neovim patch is the result of a back and forth
with Jon over the past couple of weeks or so.
I've reviewe
Hello,
Here is an update to py-neovim. Upstream switched from nose to pytest
for unit tests, but forgot to include the file defining their test
fixtures in the release tarball. So that file is included as a patch
from the upstream source tree at the time of the tag. The tests may
need increased
Hello,
Here is an update to neovim. The patch we carried in our tree was
merged upstream, so no longer needed.
OK?
--
Jon
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/editors/neovim/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7
Hi,
Stuart Henderson wrote on Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:05:07AM +0100:
> On 2018/06/22 09:39, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:09:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>>> Norm Finlay wrote on Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:55:04PM -0500:
Installing the graphing package "grace" created t
Hi,
I have two desktops that run current. After I updated the first desktop
to the latest snapshot I can no longer access ProtonMail
(mail.protonmail.com). When I try, I get the following results:
- Chromium: "Aw, Snap!"
- Firefox: Infinite "Loading ProtonMail..."
- Iridium: "Aw, Snap!"
Any idea
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 05:18:43PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> Third time's the charm. Meanwhile, Daniel Boles from upstream came up
> with a much simpler and better patch.
Looks sane to me, thanks for digging into this and doing the upstreaming
dance :)
Third time's the charm. Meanwhile, Daniel Boles from upstream came up
with a much simpler and better patch.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/merge_requests/213
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/ports/x11/gtk+2/Makefile,v
retri
On 2018-06-22 Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21 2018, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > two ports have been added since num has been removed from the OCaml
> > distribution.
> > math/ocaml-num
> > math/Zarith
>
> BTW,
> - please provide tarballs for new ports
The
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 07:56:36PM +0200, fredl wrote:
> Hey,
>
> attached is a new port, sysutils/glide. Glide is a package manager for Go.
> ---
> pkg/DESCR:
>
> Glide is a tool for managing the vendor directory within a Go package.
>
> This feature, first introduced in Go 1.5, allows each pac
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 06:31:02AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
> Hola,
>
> Here is an update to gopass. Quite a bit has changed since the last
> update: https://github.com/gopasspw/gopass/releases
>
> Upstream location also changed.
>
> I have been using this without issue for a number of days.
>
In https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1169 Daniel Boles pointed
out that the scaffolding is already there, it's just wrong.
Assuming that removable always implies name != 0, we can fix this
printf("%s", NULL) as follows:
Index: Makefile
Hola,
Here is an update to gopass. Quite a bit has changed since the last
update: https://github.com/gopasspw/gopass/releases
Upstream location also changed.
I have been using this without issue for a number of days.
OK?
diff --git a/security/gopass/Makefile b/security/gopass/Makefile
index 5a
Cutting down the Cc list...
On Thu, Jun 21 2018, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
[...]
> I'd like to collect some OKs from developers familiar with OCaml ports.
> If someone owning a powerpc or sparc machine feels like it he could try
> to enable OCaml native-code
> in /usr/ports/infrastructure
On 2018/06/21 22:01, Adam Steen wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> I applied your patch like so (just after updating my ports tree)
>
> cd /usr/ports
> patch < $HOME/downloads/ocaml.diff
Not sure if it will make any difference here, but I would recommend
"patch -Ep0" which makes it create directories as nece
On 2018-06-21 Adam Steen wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> I applied your patch like so (just after updating my ports tree)
>
> cd /usr/ports
> patch < $HOME/downloads/ocaml.diff
> cd /usr/ports/lang/ocaml
> make install
>
> but it fails with
>
> ===> Building package for ocaml-graphics-4.06.1
> Create
On Thu, Jun 21 2018, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
[...]
> two ports have been added since num has been removed from the OCaml
> distribution.
> math/ocaml-num
> math/Zarith
BTW,
- please provide tarballs for new ports
- wouldn't it make sense to import Zarith as math/ocaml-zarith instead?
--
On 2018/06/22 09:39, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:09:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Norm Finlay wrote on Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:55:04PM -0500:
> >
> > > Installing the graphing package "grace" created the following warnings.
> > > This occurred in the v6.3
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:09:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Norm Finlay wrote on Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:55:04PM -0500:
>
> > Installing the graphing package "grace" created the following warnings.
> > This occurred in the v6.3 release. The folks on irc suggested I email this
> > to
20 matches
Mail list logo
