Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > Hi! > The diff below moves COMPILER string template and its description > to the position used in most of the ports. > OK? Comments? While here, maybe worth add COMPILER_LANGS as well? > > Index: Makefile.template > ==

Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Tue, July 2, 2019 11:55, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: >> Hi! >> The diff below moves COMPILER string template and its description >> to the position used in most of the ports. >> OK? Comments? > > While here, maybe worth add COMPILER_L

Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:22:44PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > On Tue, July 2, 2019 11:55, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > >> Hi! > >> The diff below moves COMPILER string template and its description > >> to the position used in most

Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/07/02 11:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:22:44PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > > On Tue, July 2, 2019 11:55, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > > >> Hi! > > >> The diff below moves COMPILER string templat

Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 11:55:35AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/07/02 11:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:22:44PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: > > > On Tue, July 2, 2019 11:55, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Byc

Re: Makefile.template tweak

2019-07-02 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Tue, July 2, 2019 13:55, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/07/02 11:59, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:22:44PM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: >> > On Tue, July 2, 2019 11:55, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >> > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:00:29AM +0300, Kirill Bychkov wrote: >> >

Weird behaviour of updating flavored package via pkg_add -u

2019-07-02 Thread mazocomp
Hi! Today is my upgrade day, so I traditionally run `pkg_add -u`, but this time I get a really weird output: Ambiguous: choose package for irssi-1.2.0 a 0: 1: irssi-1.2.1p0 2: irssi-1.2.1p0-socks Your choice: All other packages, including mupdf, upgraded with expeted output

sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
More than a year ago I talked with espie@ about making the sqlports info available as a json file in the CDNs/mirrors. My idea was to provide that info for people who want to create simple/static javascript web pages, external tools for monitoring the ports tree or some type of automation system.

Re: sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Daniel Jakots
I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db out from sqlports.tgz. Regarding the JSON, I think only one, with as much info as possible with avoiding bloat, should be provided. And they should have the

Re: Weird behaviour of updating flavored package via pkg_add -u

2019-07-02 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:48:12PM +0300, mazoc...@disroot.org wrote: > Hi! > > Today is my upgrade day, so I traditionally run `pkg_add -u`, but this > time I get a really weird output: > Ambiguous: choose package for irssi-1.2.0 > a 0: > 1: irssi-1.2.1p0 > 2: irssi-1.2.1p0

Re: Weird behaviour of updating flavored package via pkg_add -u

2019-07-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/07/02 18:44, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:48:12PM +0300, mazoc...@disroot.org wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Today is my upgrade day, so I traditionally run `pkg_add -u`, but this > > time I get a really weird output: > > Ambiguous: choose package for irssi-1.

Remove irssi--socks?

2019-07-02 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
I have seen a bunch of people confused by the "socks" FLAVOR of irssi. Specifically, it's not clear how to use it. After a few tests the simplest recipe I found is ''SOCKS_SERVER=127.0.0.1:1080 irssi''. On a system with no shared libs, the irssi--socks FLAVOR might make sense. But all our arch

Re: sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Landry Breuil
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily > see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db > out from sqlports.tgz. > > Regarding the JSON, I think only one, with as much info as >

[update/unbreak] emulators/vbam 2.1.1 -> 2.3.3

2019-07-02 Thread Charlene Wendling
It all started with this: > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc/last/emulators/vbam.log > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/last/emulators/vbam.log We don't ship the required file since, as far i as understand, we don't ship OpenMP. So it was needed to remove -fopenmp. It ac

Re: Weird behaviour of updating flavored package via pkg_add -u

2019-07-02 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 05:54:36PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Actually it is a bug in the port, the @pkgpath line should be adapted > depending on the flavour. Thanks, OK.

Re: sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily > see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db > out from sqlports.tgz. > > Regarding the JSON, I think only one, with as much info as >

Re: sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily > > see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db > > out from sqlports

Re: sqlports info available as a json in the CDN/mirrors, yay or nay?

2019-07-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2019/07/02 21:48, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily > > > see the content of the ports tree without