On 8/24/19 6:07 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Briefly discussed with gilles@.
>
> I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
> 1) filters are not commandline applications and I don't want them in my
>$PATH.
> 2) opensmtpd-extras already used this location, so it's only
$ cat pkg/DESCR
filter-dkim is an opensmtpd filter that signs email with a dkim signature.
$
Since I'm not too familiar with ports I would like to pay special
attention to the Makefile of both the port as well as the source.
Also, I currently host the release tarballs at my personal server, whic
$ cat pkg/DESCR
filter-dnsbl is an opensmtpd filter that checks the sender's IP address
against one or more dnsbl lists to flag or reject spam messages at session time.
$
Since I'm not too familiar with ports I would like to pay special
attention to the Makefile of both the port as well as the so
$ cat libopensmtpd/pkg/DESCR
libopensmtpd is an libevent based library which allows for easy writing
of opensmtpd filter applications in C.
$
This is required for filter-dnsbl and filter-dkim.
Since I'm not too familiar with ports I would like to pay special
attention to the Makefile of both the
Briefly discussed with gilles@.
I would like to move the filters to libexec/smtpd for two reasons.
1) filters are not commandline applications and I don't want them in my
$PATH.
2) opensmtpd-extras already used this location, so it's only consistent
to install there as well.
Diff below work
Hi, ports@:
Here is a patch to create mail/p5-Mail-AuthenticationResults, which
is required by the update of mail/p5-Mail-DKIM.
It build well and passed all tests on amd64-head system.
Comments? OK?
wen
p5-Mail-AuthenticationResults.tar.gz
Description: p5-Mail-AuthenticationResults.tar.gz
ping ...
The update of p5-Perl-Critic is waiting for it.
发件人: owner-po...@openbsd.org 代表 wen heping
发送时间: 2019年8月17日 7:20
收件人: Stuart Henderson
抄送: ports@openbsd.org
主题: 回复: 回复: [NEW] textproc/p5-PPIx-QuoteLike
ping ...
发件人: ow
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:51:42PM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> Below is a new diff that (hopefully) addresses all problems.
> OK?
It worked. The build finished this time. OK kmos
--Kurt
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/p
Hi, ports@:
Here is a patch for devel/py-tz to update to 2019.2.
It build well and passed all tests on amd64-head system.
About 20 ports depends on it, but I did not test all of them, because
this update had no code change upstream ,only changed some timezone
data corresponding to the IAN
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:47:29PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> The only drawback I can see is the update path from the old to the new
> scheme, because pkg_add(8) will complain about collisions when updating
> ghc:
>
> ]# pkg_add -uvx
> Old package ghc-8.2.2p4 will run the following commands
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:25:44PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this Frama-C release is compatible with OCaml 4.08. It builds and runs
> fine on amd64. I cannot build a bytecode-only version on amd64.
> I would welcome OKs and tests on real bytecode-only archs and i386,
> which i
Hi,
this is a sample diff to switch ghc from @exec/@unexec to
@define-tag/@tag. It only includes lang/ghc, devel/hs-stm and
devel/hs-async for now.
Basically, instead of creating all those register/unregister scripts,
the package registration files (of hs libraries) are now included
in the (OpenB
Hi,
this Frama-C release is compatible with OCaml 4.08. It builds and runs
fine on amd64. I cannot build a bytecode-only version on amd64.
I would welcome OKs and tests on real bytecode-only archs and i386,
which is currently broken.
Christopher
Index: Makefile
=
On 2019-08-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> I figure it's worth adding the old PERMIT_* forms to the positioned
> obsolete entries in /usr/ports/infrastructure/tempalte/mk.conf.template.
I wanted to suggest the same, but espie@ added them to a list of
forbidden variables in bsd.ports.mk (line 320 ff
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:55:19PM +0200, Henry Jensen wrote:
> Not sure if ports@ is correct for this. I am trying to build e2guardian[0]
> 5.3.3 on OpenBSD in order to replace dansguardian[1], which does exists
> in ports but is derelict.
>
>
> There is one obstacle. In FatController.cpp the p
Not sure if ports@ is correct for this. I am trying to build e2guardian[0]
5.3.3 on OpenBSD in order to replace dansguardian[1], which does exists
in ports but is derelict.
There is one obstacle. In FatController.cpp the program uses
sigtimedwait(), which doesn't exist on OpenBSD. The code snipp
Hi,
Here is the revised patch, set PKGNAME=${DISTNAME}0.
4 ports depends on math/cfitsio:
astro/kstars
graphics/ufraw
astro/wcslib
x11/kde-applications/gwenview
All build well with this patch on amd64-head system.
Comments? OK?
wen
发件人: o
ping.
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc/2019-07-29/x11/waimea.log
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/2019-08-12/x11/waimea.log
>
> There is a clash between std::list and the "list" class member.
>
> I've just renamed that member and its instances. It builds [0] and
>
bulk build on sparc64-0.ports.openbsd.org
started on Wed Aug 21 00:31:49 MDT 2019
finished at Fri Aug 23 06:16:18 MDT 2019
lasted 02D22h44m
done with kern.version=OpenBSD 6.6-beta (GENERIC.MP) #32: Tue Aug 20 17:30:06
MDT 2019
built packages:9714
Aug 21:7798
Aug 22:1556
Aug 23:359
critical pat
Hello, I am running amule 2.3.2 on my apu2d2 and I get VERY frequent crashes,
with the following error messages:
Assertion failed: ./src/common/fdiodispatcher.cpp:ModifyFD:113: Assertion 'i !=
m_handlers.end()' failed. modifying unregistered handler?
or
Assertion failed: ./src/common/selectdis
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 06:41:46PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:35:28PM +0200, Ingo Feinerer wrote:
> > according to
> > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2019-08-18/cad/qcad.log
> > cad/qcad compilation fails on sparc64 with
>
> > cc1plus: error: one or m
Saw those while looking at `make -n install': no need to split this into
two steps.
OK?
Index: /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
retrieving revision 1.1475
diff -u -p -r
Hi ports@,
Here's an update for devel/py-yapf from 0.26.0 to 0.28.0. The changelog
can be found here:
https://github.com/google/yapf/blob/master/CHANGELOG
Tests pass for python2 and python3 and works ok for me using the python3
version on amd64.
This port only has one consumer, security/py-art
23 matches
Mail list logo
