UPDATE: net/qbittorrent 4.2.1 to 4.2.2

2020-03-25 Thread Elias M. Mariani
Update for net/qbittorrent/qbittorrent and net/qbittorrent/qbittorrent-nox Changelog: https://github.com/qbittorrent/qBittorrent/blob/release-4.2.2/Changelog Important change: - SEARCH: Drop python2 support So jumping from lang/python/2.7 to lang/python/3.7, this is only a RUN_DEPENDS for the se

[update patch] py-eyed3 0.8.12 -> 0.9.4

2020-03-25 Thread Martin Ziemer
This patch updates py-eyed3 from 0.8.12 to 0.9.4. Since there was no maintainer, i added myself. There are two new dependencies for this version: py-deprecation and py-filetype. For those i attached new ports as .tgz-files based on /usr/ports/devel. If another format as .tgz is preferred for new

Re: REVISION: devel/py-jedi and devel/py-parso to python3 only

2020-03-25 Thread Paco Esteban
On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Elias M. Mariani wrote: > The only consumers of py-jedi are: > - devel/spyder/spyder,python3 > - x11/gnome/builder > > Both using devel/py-jedi,python3, moving to py3-jedi only. > > Then the only consumer of devel/py-parso becomes: > devel/py-jedi,python3 > > Also moving to

net/telegram-purple: mark NOT_FOR_ARCHS = ${BE_ARCHS}

2020-03-25 Thread Theo Buehler
kmos asked me to take a look at the net/telegram-purple build failure [1] on sparc64. This also occurs in mips64 [2] and macppc (marked broken): assertion "get_int () == TLS_SCHEMA_V2" failed: file "generate.c", line 2831, function "parse_tlo_file" It's obviously an endianness issue: get_int (

[Update] devel/p5-Config-IniFiles : Update to 3.000003

2020-03-25 Thread wen heping
Hi, ports@: Here is a simple patch for devel/p5-Config-IniFiles to update to 3.03. It build well and pass all tests on amd64-current system. Three ports depend on devel/p5-Config-IniFiles: 1) audio/p5-Audio-Scrobbler: build well and pass all tests 2) devel/p5-Config-Auto: build well

dwz vs xul

2020-03-25 Thread Marc Espie
Haven't had time to investigate, but it seems libxul might have issues. Errors show up in all 3 ports (www/firefox-esr, www/mozilla-firefox and mail/thunderbird) Looks like: > Extracting debug info from lib/thunderbird/libxul.so.34.0 dwz: lib/thunderbird/.debug/libxul.so.34.0.dbg: Couldn't find D

Re: UPDATE: Tor Browser 9.0.7

2020-03-25 Thread Chris Bennett
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:23:14AM +0530, putridsou...@gmail.com wrote: > Is there a way to push this > update to the -stable branch > Or does the -stable package > version stays constant? > Because the 8.0.9 version > doesn't work. Not in pkg_add > nor in the ports. > You will need to move to -

Re: Kernel relink and disable ulpt in kernel - cups printing

2020-03-25 Thread Mikolaj Kucharski
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:04:35PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:08:10AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > - How do you handle kernel modifications via config(8) with kernel > > > relinking in a more automated way? > > > > $ cat /etc/rc.shutdown

Re: UPDATE: Tor Browser 9.0.7

2020-03-25 Thread Chris Bennett
If you do upgrade to -current and wish to use ports, which isn't actually useful for anything unless you are either working on NEW or UPDATED ports, You will have to keep /usr/ports in sync with whatever -current you are running. DO NOT update to ports that do not match exactly which -current you a

[patch] net/mautrix-whatsapp

2020-03-25 Thread Renaud Allard
Hello, This small diff to make mautrix-whatsapp example config listen to 127.0.0.1 by default instead of 0.0.0.0 Regards Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/mautrix-whatsapp/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 diff -u

Re: Kernel relink and disable ulpt in kernel - cups printing

2020-03-25 Thread Chris Bennett
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:23:48PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:04:35PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:08:10AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > - How do you handle kernel modifications via config(8) with kernel > > > > relinkin

Re: net/telegram-purple: mark NOT_FOR_ARCHS = ${BE_ARCHS}

2020-03-25 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:04:46PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > kmos asked me to take a look at the net/telegram-purple build failure [1] > on sparc64. This also occurs in mips64 [2] and macppc (marked broken): > assertion "get_int () == TLS_SCHEMA_V2" failed: file "generate.c", line 2831, > fun

Update lang/jruby 9.2.11.0 -> 9.2.11.1

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremy Evans
Simple update to the latest version of JRuby to fix an issue with Kernel#sprintf that could have security implications. See https://www.jruby.org/2020/03/25/jruby-9-2-11-1.html for details. Tested on amd64, the only supported arch. Will be committing in a couple days unless I hear objections. T

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Paco Esteban
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets > > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies > > declarations from foo/bar>=1.1 to foo/bar>=1.1

Re: [update patch] py-eyed3 0.8.12 -> 0.9.4

2020-03-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
AFAIK from the update notes it shouldn't need py-magic any more. (I didn't do the update myself because I don't have time to shepherd new ports atm :) On 2020/03/25 10:31, Martin Ziemer wrote: > This patch updates py-eyed3 from 0.8.12 to 0.9.4. > > Since there was no maintainer, i added myself.

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:11:14PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: > > > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets > > > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should cha

[UPDATED] net/wiresep 0.9.0 -> 0.10.1

2020-03-25 Thread Tim Kuijsten
Here is WireSep version 0.10.1. I've upstreamed both patches and incorporated some feedback I got from Klemens Nannie and Janne Johansson, big thanks! -Tim wiresep-0.10.1.tgz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

PORTS_PRIVSEP=Yes and doas install

2020-03-25 Thread Lucas
Hello ports@, Today I spent a fair amount of time trying to understand why, after having set relevant bits of configuration in /etc/doas.conf and /etc/mk.conf, `make` was asking me for passwords. Setup = /etc/doas.conf: permit persist lucas as root permit nopass keepenv lucas

Re: [new] Puppet 6

2020-03-25 Thread Arthur Barton
Hi Ports Has anyone had a chance to review? Cheers, Arthur -- Arthur Barton arth...@igniferous.net On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, at 14:33, Arthur Barton wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a puppet 6 port, it re-uses the existing patches for puppet5. > Confirmed working on amd64, only tested on a very minim

Re: NEW: devel/dwz

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Mar 23 2020, Brian Callahan wrote: > On 2020-03-23 11:11 AM, Marc Espie wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:08:16AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-03-23 10:54 AM, Marc Espie wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:22:16PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > Hello ports --

Re: PORTS_PRIVSEP=Yes and doas install

2020-03-25 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:12:51AM +, Lucas wrote: > Today I spent a fair amount of time trying to understand why, after > having set relevant bits of configuration in /etc/doas.conf and > /etc/mk.conf, `make` was asking me for passwords. Did you just try typing "make install"? If you do "do

Re: [sparc64/base-gcc] Fix build of graphics/colord-gtk

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Tue, Mar 24 2020, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > Adding -L${X11BASE}/lib to CFLAGS fixes the build on sparc64 (And presumably > other base-gcc architectures). > > No revision bump since it hasn't built on sparc64 and shouldn't make > a difference to non-sparc64. > > ok? > > (cc maintainer) > > --Kurt

Re: [sparc64/base-gcc/ld.bfd] Fix build of x11/libhandy

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Tue, Mar 24 2020, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > x11/libhandy needs ports-gcc on base-gcc architectures and needs > -L${X11BASE}/lib added to CFLAGS to build properly on base-gcc > architectures. > > No REVISION bump since it hasn't built on those other architectures > before. > > (cc maintainer) J

Re: [NEW] p5-TeX-Encode for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 08:53:53PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > Any comments? OK afresh1@ > Thanks > -- > Chris Bennett > > -- andrew - http://afresh1.com Computer analyst to programmer: "You start coding. I'll go find out what they want."

Re: [Update] devel/p5-Config-IniFiles : Update to 3.000003

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:49:57AM +, wen heping wrote: > Hi, ports@: > > Here is a simple patch for devel/p5-Config-IniFiles to update to 3.03. > It build well and pass all tests on amd64-current system. > > Three ports depend on devel/p5-Config-IniFiles: > 1) audio/p5-Audio-Scro

Re: [NEW-WIP] p5-MooseX-FollowPBP (error question) for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 05:36:18PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > Attached copy. > I am getting an error with make package. What is this and does it > matter? This also is a warning, it means the NAME section in Attribute.pm POD doesn't have a short description (stuff after " - "), and turns out it

Re: [NEW] p5-LaTeX-Table for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:37:44PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > Comments very welcome on this one. Rather than the MESSAGE, maybe we should just make those packages RUN_DEPENDS? I do see that will pull in texlive/base, but is this module useful really without that? I guess I am fine either way

Re: clarification of REVISION and EPOCH documentation.

2020-03-25 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Wed, Mar 25 2020, Paco Esteban wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2020, Marc Espie wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0100, Paco Esteban wrote: >> > oh, that did not occur to me ... You mean that if port foo/bar gets >> > EPOCH = 0, then all dependent ports should change it's dependencies >>

Re: [NEW] p5-Email-Stuffer for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 03:50:27PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > Simple module for sending emails on top of other Email:: modules. OK afresh1@ > Comments? > > -- > Chris Bennett > > -- andrew - http://afresh1.com Beta. Software undergoes beta testing shortly before it's released.

Re: [NEW] p5-Template-Plugin-Latex for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 08:17:56PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > Comments? This was how I used to do invoicing when I needed to do that. Glad to have given it up. However, it seems to need Capture::Tiny as a TEST_DEPENDS, but with that the tests passed. We do get to run a few more tests if we s

Re: 回复: [NEW] www/p5-Plack-Request-WithEncoding

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:26:23AM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 07:04:27PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:41:45PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 02:41:24PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2

Re: 回复: [NEW] p5-HTML-Selector-XPath for upcoming LedgerSMB port

2020-03-25 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:22:39PM -0400, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:46:32AM +, wen heping wrote: > > Hi, > > > >It build well and pass all tests. > >But I have two suggestions: > > i) sysutils/p5-Capture-Tiny is not needed in TEST_DEPENDS. > > ii) I woul

Re: PORTS_PRIVSEP=Yes and doas install

2020-03-25 Thread Lucas
Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > Did you just try typing "make install"? Yes, that was all I ran. If you read the whole email, you will see the doas install in the subject refers to /usr/bin/install and not a "typo" of sorts for doas make install, which is, I assume, what you think I did. -Lucas

Re: PORTS_PRIVSEP=Yes and doas install

2020-03-25 Thread Lucas
Here is patch for the proposed approach. It's two attachments actually, one for src and one for ports. I think I didn't miss any documentation spot and did a test build of just one package, but I didn't do a bulk nor any other stress test. You can also find attached the script output of said test

UPDATE: net/prosody 0.11.5

2020-03-25 Thread Lucas
Hello ports@, Find a update for prosody-0.11.5. Release notes are small: * prosody / mod_posix: Support for command-line flags to override daemonize config option * mod_websocket: Clear mask bit when reflecting ping frames The bullet is the responsible for the changes in prosody.rc. daemon

Re: PORTS_PRIVSEP=Yes and doas install

2020-03-25 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:14:18AM +, Lucas wrote: > Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > Did you just try typing "make install"? > Yes, that was all I ran. If you read the whole email, you will see > the doas install in the subject refers to /usr/bin/install and not a > "typo" of sorts for doas make i