Re: UPDATE: aom 3.9.1

2024-06-22 Thread Brad Smith
ping. On 2024-06-12 11:41 p.m., Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to aom 3.9.1. 2024-06-05 v3.9.1 This release includes several bug fixes. This release is ABI compatible with the last release. See https://aomedia.googlesource.com/aom/+log/v3.9.0..v3.9.1 for all the commits in thi

Re: UPDATE: libvpx 1.14.1

2024-06-22 Thread Brad Smith
ping. On 2024-06-02 12:30 a.m., Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to libvpx 1.14.1. 2024-05-21 v1.14.1 "Venetian Duck" This release includes enhancements and bug fixes. - Upgrading: This release is ABI compatible with the previous release. - Enhancement: Improved the det

UPDATE: burpsuite-2024.5.3 (java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError)

2024-06-22 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Simple update diff burpsuite to 2024.5.3. Unfortunately I get the following error message: Could not start Burp: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError The java version is corrent. I also added some magic JAVA bits from Archlinux without success. Is that an issue with our java version? Any clue?

Re: urban{t, }error

2024-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/06/21 12:45, Ryan Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:26:27AM -0400, Thomas Frohwein wrote: > > urbanterror is another package that doesn't run without NOBTCFI. > > Reported on reddit by Antoine-Darquier[1]. ok to add it with the diff > > below? > > > > Hey, > > I never noticed t

Re: UPDATE: QEMU 9.0.1

2024-06-22 Thread Brad Smith
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 07:38:59AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to QEMU 9.0.1. > > > https://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=171808086221928&w=2 An updated diff rolling in a diff that should fix building on powerpc/powerpc64 with an issue that popped up with 8.1 and a hack to resolve

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/06/22 00:45, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > ports@, > > Here a ping about mitmproxy port. > > I've reattached the archive with all required dependencies. > > -- > wbr, Kirill I've attached a new tgz with some small tweaks, and include a diff below with commentary on those changes. With t

Re: ioquake3 BTCFI {t,}error

2024-06-22 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Thomas Frohwein writes: > Hi, > > ioquake3 is another port that fails with BTCFI, and for now restored to > running order with USE_NOBTCFI=Yes. While here, enable DEBUG_PACKAGES > per bentley's suggestion. > > ok? Please add an explanatory comment for USE_NOBTCFI (like: is it a custom JIT? is it a

ruby arm64 BTI

2024-06-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
Theo pointed out the NOBTCFI reversal here. Now the reason that we still see SIGILL despite fixes to the assembly code is because the -mbranch-protection=pac-ret option added by the configure script actually downgrades our default of enabling both BTI and PAC to just enabling PAC. So the necessar

riscv64 bulk build report

2024-06-22 Thread jca
Bulk build on riscv64-1.ports.openbsd.org Started : Wed Jun 12 04:23:11 MDT 2024 Finished: Sat Jun 22 05:29:48 MDT 2024 Duration: 10 Days 1 hours 7 minutes Built using OpenBSD 7.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #7: Wed Jun 12 16:19:53 MDT 2024 Built 10639 packages Number of packages built each day: Jun 1

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
> www/py-aioquic has an issue, IPV6_V6ONLY is neutered on OpenBSD so > it is broken, so I'm not entirely happy importing it as-is (although > mitmproxy itself does work as long as you don't use the quic support). I tried the attached patch as a dumb attempt. With that, I picked a v4-only example f

Re: ruby arm64 BTI

2024-06-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
Mark Kettenis wrote: > Theo pointed out the NOBTCFI reversal here. Now the reason that we > still see SIGILL despite fixes to the assembly code is because the > -mbranch-protection=pac-ret option added by the configure script > actually downgrades our default of enabling both BTI and PAC to just

[maintainer update] devel/gopls 0.16.0

2024-06-22 Thread Laurent Cheylus
Hi, update for devel/gopls port (Go LSP server) to the latest version 0.16.0. Changelog: https://github.com/golang/tools/releases/tag/gopls/v0.16.0 - update Makefile, distinfo and modules.inc - update pkg/PLIST via "make update-plist' after fake install Build and tests OK on current/amd64 with G

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
Stuart, Thanks on review, I appreciete it and I'm ok with all your changes. On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:11:14 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > www/py-aioquic has an issue, IPV6_V6ONLY is neutered on OpenBSD so > it is broken, so I'm not entirely happy importing it as-is (although > mitmproxy itself

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/06/22 14:29, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > Stuart, > > Thanks on review, I appreciete it and I'm ok with all your changes. > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:11:14 +0100, > Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > www/py-aioquic has an issue, IPV6_V6ONLY is neutered on OpenBSD so > > it is broken, so I'm n

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:53:52 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > www/py-aioquic has an issue, IPV6_V6ONLY is neutered on OpenBSD so > > it is broken, so I'm not entirely happy importing it as-is (although > > mitmproxy itself does work as long as you don't use the quic support). > > I tried the

Re: Update: ruby-rmagick 6.0.1

2024-06-22 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 07:35:07PM +, Jeremy Evans wrote: > This should fix rb_gc_adjust_memory_usage issues when building > on riscv64/sparc64 with Ruby 3.3. > > Crashes reported by jca@ After applying your update diff, this also crashes on riscv64, with: /usr/local/lib/ruby/3.3/mkmf.rb:984

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:39:24 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2024/06/22 14:29, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > > > > I found an issue https://github.com/aiortc/aioquic/issues/459 regarding > > this, and I had made a fix wchich I sent to upstream as > > https://github.com/aiortc/aioquic/pull/51

Re: security/py-mitmproxy: new port (version 10.3.0)

2024-06-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/06/22 14:58, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: > My approach is different with attempt to avoid dual stack, which based on > use AI_ADDRCONFIG to determine which stack should be used. > > What should fix both cases I guess. > > Just a side note: do you know any other OS which doesn't support dual

Re: ruby arm64 BTI

2024-06-22 Thread Jeremy Evans
On 06/22 01:41, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Theo pointed out the NOBTCFI reversal here. Now the reason that we > still see SIGILL despite fixes to the assembly code is because the > -mbranch-protection=pac-ret option added by the configure script > actually downgrades our default of enabling both BTI a

Re: UPDATE: burpsuite-2024.5.3 (java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError)

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:06:43 +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > Simple update diff burpsuite to 2024.5.3. > > Unfortunately I get the following error message: > Could not start Burp: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError > > The java version is corrent. I also added some magic JAVA bits from > A

Re: ruby arm64 BTI

2024-06-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: "Theo de Raadt" > Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:16:03 -0600 > > Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Theo pointed out the NOBTCFI reversal here. Now the reason that we > > still see SIGILL despite fixes to the assembly code is because the > > -mbranch-protection=pac-ret option added by the configure

Re: ruby arm64 BTI

2024-06-22 Thread Theo de Raadt
Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: "Theo de Raadt" > > Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:16:03 -0600 > > > > Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Theo pointed out the NOBTCFI reversal here. Now the reason that we > > > still see SIGILL despite fixes to the assembly code is because the > > > -mbranch-protectio

[lang/go] remove mips64 support

2024-06-22 Thread Joel Sing
The openbsd/mips64 port is effectively unmaintainable. I've been trying to upstream the direct syscall to libc conversion for two years now: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/61546 Currently, I'm carrying a bunch of extra diffs in ports, I have limited working hardware to build/test on and wh

Re: new port: mail/p5-Email-Outlook-Message

2024-06-22 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
ping On Mon, Jun 10, 2024, 04:29 Stuart Henderson wrote: > OK (whoever imports, beware the CVS dirs in the tar) > > > On 2024/06/10 04:00, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 2:20 PM Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > > > Added automatically if you set > > > >

[security update] editors/emacs: update to 29.4

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
Jeremie, ports@, Here an update for emacs whcih contains security fix for org-mode. Announce - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-06/msg00695.html - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2024-06/msg00397.html Changes: - https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-

[Maintainer Update] archivers/zpaqfranz-59.9

2024-06-22 Thread tux0r
Just so op@ won't be bored too much :p, here's just another patch. zpaqfranz 59.9 adds NO_COLOR support on OpenBSD (and other stuff). Release page: https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz/releases/tag/59.9 Patch attached. diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile b/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile in

Re: nginx: imrpove compatibiliy with unwind

2024-06-22 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
Greetings, I just realized that I forgot to add maintainer. So, I fix it. BTW the patch were accepted to freenginy: https://freenginx.org/hg/nginx/rev/ea0eef2dd12c ports@ Here a trivial patch which improves compatibility with unwind. I'm using the following unwind.config: preference { re

NEW: x11/kvantum

2024-06-22 Thread izder456
Hey ports@ This is a new port for the Kvantum theme engine for Qt/KDE I was surprised no-one had ported this already considering both LXQT and Plasma are in the ports tree. anywho, here is the port attached. OK to COMMIT? or some nits? Thanks, -- -iz (they/them) > i like to say mundane thin