Re: trim libtool gcc's search path.

2005-12-18 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Marc, * Marc Espie wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:28:03PM CET: On OpenBSD at least, once gcc is built and installed, there is no need to look at potential directories... This reduces libtool search path from 10 entries to 2 on a typical OpenBSD system... considering that this can be

Re: libtool vs. -lresolv

2005-12-15 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Thorsten Glaser wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:10:09PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues dixit: The patch is fine as a workaround for above. But regarding upstream libtool, I'd rather like the fix be done in the right place, in KDEs configury. It's not only KDE which barfs at it. Things get worse

Re: get 'libtool --tag CXX' to work

2005-12-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/15455 ] * Marc Espie wrote on Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:13:45AM CET: This includes the former --tag CXX fix, plus the part that makes --tag=disable-static --tag=disable-shared independent from other tags by delaying their effect.

Re: get 'libtool --tag CXX' to work

2005-12-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes: On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:27:59PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:59:19PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: I am currently checking that at least kdelibs is happy with this diff and standard libtool, so far, so good... Thanks for

Re: get 'libtool --tag CXX' to work

2005-12-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Marc Espie wrote on Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:27:47PM CET: The preserve_args fragment was missing, thus the generated relink commands were bogus. I have applied this to branch-1-5. Cheers, Ralf 2005-12-07 Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltmain.in: Preserve both parts of `--tag TAG',

Re: weird ksh eval behavior

2005-12-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Otto Moerbeek wrote on Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:17:01PM CET: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:43:31PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: With ash-0.3.8, OpenBSD 3.8 'sh' and 'ksh' PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2, $ false; eval 'foo=$?'; echo $foo 0

weird ksh eval behavior

2005-12-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
This one is the reason for a subtle CVS Libtool testsuite failure.. With ash-0.3.8, OpenBSD 3.8 'sh' and 'ksh' PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2, I get $ false; eval 'foo=$?'; echo $foo 0 Is this a shell bug, or am I doing something wrong? If bug, where should I report it? If not, is this behavior

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-29 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:19:44AM CET: On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:15:09AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before the patch does put them in the order they are encountered. my

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jacob, * Jacob Meuser wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:03:56AM CET: On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Libtool knows that the library is uninstalled, because this information is encoded in libbar.la yes, it winds up in $notinst_path. I disconvered

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ Cc: to libtool mailing list. This thread is at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/14993 and the interesting bit starts at the end of this post: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/15121 ] * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM CET: * Jacob

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-27 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jacob, * Jacob Meuser wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:42:07AM CET: On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:04:07PM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Marc Espie espie at nerim.net writes: I'm very annoyed at libtool --mode=link cc -L/usr/local/lib -o foo foo.o ./libbar.la expanding into some

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Marc Espie espie at nerim.net writes: As far as OpenBSD goes, we solve the `various versions' issue differently. - we have kept the version numbers from old a.out. Our ELF ld.so knows about libfoo.so.major.minor. I have a hard time to learn this from the manpages, by the way. - if we

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Sorry for the delay. Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes: On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM -0500, Brad wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:10:33PM -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:12:36PM -0500, Brad wrote: So whatever the library name is supposed to

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-17 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jacob, Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes: On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:50:56AM +, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes: the following patch for the libtool port changes library_names_spec to just '${libname}${shared_ext}$versuffix

Re: libtool no symlinked libs patch

2005-11-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Jacob Meuser jakemsr at jakemsr.com writes: while working on an update for multimedia/mjpegtools, and adding USE_LIBTOOL=Yes, I would get libraries where lib/libfoo.so.4.0 would be a symlink to lib/libfoo-1.8.so.4.0, the real library. the following patch for the libtool port changes