I am re-posting about this change for rsync since it has been several
more weeks. I appreciate everyone who has responded. I would like to see
anyone else who might have objections to this speak up. I also checked
around to see what FreeBSD and Debian are doing and both include zstd,
lz4, and
Re upgrade paths / defaults (i.e. whether to have -minimal as a low-dep
option and include zstd etc otherwise, or whether to avoid them by default
and have -full as the version with run deps) - I think it really depends on
what would be considered acceptable by whoever it was that complained
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 12:26:52PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> This patch to switch rsync to being built by default with iconv, lz4,
> and zstd and then also build a -minimal flavor which removes all of
> those has been floating around on ports@ for several weeks. Any further
> comments?
This patch to switch rsync to being built by default with iconv, lz4,
and zstd and then also build a -minimal flavor which removes all of
those has been floating around on ports@ for several weeks. Any further
comments? I suspect switching to zstd compression (which would be the
default once this
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> People were complaining that it pushed too many deps, both for the
> package and for the port. The 'minimal' FLAVOR should cover that.
>
> > @@ -35,7 +33,10 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS =--disable-lz4 \
> >
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 10:24:43AM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:39:57AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2024/07/01 18:32, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > > I updated the title based on the discussion and what this patch actually
> > > does now. I have a particular
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:39:57AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/07/01 18:32, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> > I updated the title based on the discussion and what this patch actually
> > does now. I have a particular project that needs zstd compression with
> > rsync. I can modify the port
On 2024/07/01 18:32, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> I updated the title based on the discussion and what this patch actually
> does now. I have a particular project that needs zstd compression with
> rsync. I can modify the port in my own tree to build zstd into the port
> but I would prefer not to
I updated the title based on the discussion and what this patch actually
does now. I have a particular project that needs zstd compression with
rsync. I can modify the port in my own tree to build zstd into the port
but I would prefer not to have to maintain a private package repository.
Based on
