On 2020/02/15 17:59, Alessandro De Laurenzis wrote:
> Hello Stuart,
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> On 15/02/2020 - 15:09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> [...]
> > > - Since we're already accepting that this code isn't C99 compliant, I
> > > propose to clean-up a bit more the build log, adding
Hello Stuart,
Thanks for looking into this.
On 15/02/2020 - 15:09, Stuart Henderson wrote:
[...]
- Since we're already accepting that this code isn't C99 compliant, I
propose to clean-up a bit more the build log, adding
-Wno-implicit-function-declaration to CFLAG.
It's not just that it isn't
On 2020/02/15 09:44, Alessandro De Laurenzis wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The attached diff updates cad/qrouter to the latest release.
>
> What's new upstream
> ===
> After the recent thread about unbreaking this port for non-CLANG archs (see
> [1]), I made a PR on github proposing
Hi,
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 09:44:51 +0100
Alessandro De Laurenzis wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The attached diff updates cad/qrouter to the latest release.
>
> What's new upstream
> ===
> After the recent thread about unbreaking this port for non-CLANG
> archs (see [1]), I made a PR on
Greetings,
The attached diff updates cad/qrouter to the latest release.
What's new upstream
===
After the recent thread about unbreaking this port for non-CLANG archs
(see [1]), I made a PR on github proposing (among other things) the
needed patch and it has been accepted;
