Re: [UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-11-14 Thread Donovan Watteau
Hi, Anyone else's ok for this update? Thanks. On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Jonathan Armani wrote: Hi, Tested ok on amd64 and diff looks good.  I'm not sure the tweaks in MESSAGE are still revelant, but it can be adjusted later. Does someone have an idea for SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMOUSE ? A problem

Re: [UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-11-14 Thread Donovan Watteau
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Brian Callahan wrote: Could you resend the diff? (and make sure it's still working on -current) July was a long time ago... Yes, it still works on -current. Here you go (there are some CRLF in patch-bam_0_2_0_src_base_bam though): Index: Makefile

Re: [UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-11-14 Thread Brian Callahan
On 11/14/14 15:51, Donovan Watteau wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2014, Brian Callahan wrote: Could you resend the diff? (and make sure it's still working on -current) July was a long time ago... Yes, it still works on -current. Thanks. One of the patches doesn't apply cleanly but it's a patch that

Re: [UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-09-05 Thread Jonathan Armani
Hi, I would like a review / ok from another porter to commit that. Thanks 2014-07-11 12:19 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Armani d...@asystant.net: Hi, Tested ok on amd64 and diff looks good. I'm not sure the tweaks in MESSAGE are still revelant, but it can be adjusted later. Does someone have an

Re: [UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-07-11 Thread Jonathan Armani
Hi, Tested ok on amd64 and diff looks good. I'm not sure the tweaks in MESSAGE are still revelant, but it can be adjusted later. Does someone have an idea for SDL_VIDEO_X11_DGAMOUSE ? A problem without gfx_noclip 0 ? ok armani@ 2014-05-08 18:42 GMT+02:00 Donovan Watteau tso...@gmail.com:

[UPDATE] teeworlds-0.6.2

2014-05-08 Thread Donovan Watteau
Hi, The following diff updates Teeworlds to 0.6.2. In early 2012, I sent an update from teeworlds-0.5.2 to 0.6.1 to armani@. But today, 0.5.2 is still the tree, so I'd like to take its maintainership. Here are the changes: - don't bother building on strict-alignment archs. On loongson, both