You should take maintainer. I don't use this port any more.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:14:08PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Ping ... still needs a maintainer ok :-)
>
> On 6/12/23 17:42, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > Ping with an update to rebar3 3.22.0.
> > Difference to 3.21.0 affects Windows
On 2023/06/28 17:45, Omar Polo wrote:
> I'd rewrite it in a slightly more verbose, but hopefully more clear,
> way as:
>
> +.if ${FLAVOR:Merlang25} || ${FLAVOR:Merlang25}
+1, though with the typo fixed ;)
On 2023/06/27 21:14:08 +0200, Volker Schlecht
wrote:
> Ping ... still needs a maintainer ok :-)
+cc jmatthew@ (forgotten during the pings)
> On 6/12/23 17:42, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > Ping with an update to rebar3 3.22.0.
> > Difference to 3.21.0 affects Windows only, but since I'm proposi
Ping ... still needs a maintainer ok :-)
On 6/12/23 17:42, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Ping with an update to rebar3 3.22.0.
> Difference to 3.21.0 affects Windows only, but since I'm proposing
> an update anyway, why not take the latest version.
>
> Both flavors still build, test and run fine on am
Ping with an update to rebar3 3.22.0.
Difference to 3.21.0 affects Windows only, but since I'm proposing
an update anyway, why not take the latest version.
Both flavors still build, test and run fine on amd64.
On 5/19/23 09:07, Volker Schlecht wrote:
Cc: Maintainer
Updates rebar3 to 3.21.0, wh
Cc: Maintainer
Updates rebar3 to 3.21.0, which is the fist version to be fully
compatible with erlang26.
Adds an erlang26 FLAVOR
Tests pass without failure for both flavors.Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/rebar3/Ma
