On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> How about the following diff (relative to the in-ports version)? I changed:
> [...]
Sounds good to me, thanks. (I think I made a mistake with cvs - one
of my local change fixed the fake issue, but didn't get added to the
patch.)
Is t
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 09:08:04PM -0400, Scott Vokes wrote:
> > - I think being able to install both py-markdown and discount is useful,
> > so I'd prefer having distinct names
> > [...]
> > Otherwise, the regression tests work for me too, on amd64, and I'd like
> > to see this update.
> Ok, plea
> - I think being able to install both py-markdown and discount is useful,
> so I'd prefer having distinct names
> [...]
> Otherwise, the regression tests work for me too, on amd64, and I'd like
> to see this update.
Ok, please retry with this patch. I'm renaming the standalone program
to 'discoun
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 02:00:26PM -0400, Scott Vokes wrote:
> This updates discount to 1.6.4. Upgrading is highly recommended, as
> the update fixes a couple security issues.
>
> Also, I'm no longer renaming the standalone executable from 'markdown'
> to 'discount'. Instead, it's marked as @confl
This updates discount to 1.6.4. Upgrading is highly recommended, as
the update fixes a couple security issues.
Also, I'm no longer renaming the standalone executable from 'markdown'
to 'discount'. Instead, it's marked as @conflicting with
textproc/markdown. Is that ok?
Tested on amd64, and make r
