Daniel Jakots writes:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:22:05 -0500, attila
> wrote:
>
>> attila writes:
>>
>> > Hi ports@,
>> >
>> > Attached is an update for textproc/py-lxml to version 3.6.0. It
>> > passes "make test" on i386
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:22:05 -0500, attila
wrote:
> attila writes:
>
> > Hi ports@,
> >
> > Attached is an update for textproc/py-lxml to version 3.6.0. It
> > passes "make test" on i386 (both python2 and python3).
> >
> > Feedback most welcome.
attila writes:
> Hi ports@,
>
> Attached is an update for textproc/py-lxml to version 3.6.0. It
> passes "make test" on i386 (both python2 and python3).
>
> Feedback most welcome.
>
> Pax, -A
Ping? Patch attached again for completeness. Feedback most welcome.
Pax,
Hi ports@,
Attached is an update for textproc/py-lxml to version 3.6.0. It
passes "make test" on i386 (both python2 and python3).
Feedback most welcome.
Pax, -A
--
http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF
Index: Makefile
attila att...@stalphonsos.com writes:
attila att...@stalphonsos.com writes:
textproc/py-lxml was at 3.3.5, which is a year old. I needed a more
recent release, so I have an update that brings us to 3.4.3 (released
15-APR-2015), attached.
The only changes are the single edit I made to
On 2015/04/29 13:58, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
Diff addressing the issue above plus the following nits:
OK with me.
Regarding ''make test'':
- the current port failed 10 times out of 10, 2 of them due to a double
free error
- the proposed port failed 3 times out of 10, all of them
Attila att...@stalphonsos.com writes:
attila att...@stalphonsos.com writes:
textproc/py-lxml was at 3.3.5, which is a year old. I needed a more
recent release, so I have an update that brings us to 3.4.3 (released
15-APR-2015), attached.
The only changes are the single edit I made to bring
textproc/py-lxml was at 3.3.5, which is a year old. I needed a more
recent release, so I have an update that brings us to 3.4.3 (released
15-APR-2015), attached.
The only changes are the single edit I made to bring us to version
3.4.3 and those introduced by makesum and update-plist, which
attila att...@stalphonsos.com writes:
textproc/py-lxml was at 3.3.5, which is a year old. I needed a more
recent release, so I have an update that brings us to 3.4.3 (released
15-APR-2015), attached.
The only changes are the single edit I made to bring us to version
3.4.3 and those
In most of your submissions, you do not say if you have tested any
of the dependencies.
From the changelog:
Note that this breaks the usage of some of
the generated XPath expressions as XSLT location paths that
previously worked in 2.3.1.
So I would say this is worth testing.
$ sqlite3
2011/11/28 Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
In most of your submissions, you do not say if you have tested any
of the dependencies.
Actually I did not test all of the dependencies but some of it.
The dependencies you listed all run_depends on py-lxml so it is
difficult to test if the
Hi,
Here is an update of textproc/py-lxml to 2.3.2.
Tested and regress both OK on Loongson.
Comments? OK?
wen
cvs server: Diffing py-lxml
Index: py-lxml/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/py-lxml/Makefile,v
Hi,
Here is an update of textproc/py-lxml to 2.3.1.
Tested and regress both OK on Loongson.
Comments? OK?
wen
Index: py-lxml/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/py-lxml/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u
Hi,
this is the diff to update py-lxml to 2.3.
Tested on amd64.
Is it ok ?
Cheers,
Remi.Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/py-lxml/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 Makefile
--- Makefile8
14 matches
Mail list logo